Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Actual evapotranspiration

ET is the evaporation of water from the soil surface and by plant transpiration (primarily through the stomata on the plant s leaves). ET should be carefully considered during all stages of design since it will be the largest mechanism of water removal in the water balance for an ET cover. With current knowledge, it is necessary to estimate potential evapotranspiration (PET) first and then using the PET estimate the actual evapotranspiration (AET) for the site. [Pg.1067]

Alternative Cover Assessment Program Actual evapotranspiration Alternative Final Landfill Covers Alternative Landfill Cover Demonstration Department of Energy Environmental Policy Integrated Climate Evapotranspiration... [Pg.1087]

The annual mean water percolation Qie,zb is determined by the long-term mean annual temperature (mainly determining the potential evapotranspiration, Epol) and precipitation (mainly influencing the actual evapotranspiration, act) according to... [Pg.85]

Evaporation is influenced not only by the amount of energy available but also by the amount of water available. If unlimited volumes of water are available in the soil and on surface areas, this is referred to as potential evapotranspiration, i.e. the highest possible evapotranspiration under given climatic conditions. The actual evapotranspiration is the evapotranspiration which can effectively be observed. This is always lower than potential evapotranspiration and is dependent on water availability, plant and surface attributes, net radiation, air humidity, and wind speed. In mountains with a great deal of barren soil and large areas of debris and rock cover which are unable to store water in any great quantities, and with fastflowing water over steep terrain, actual evapotranspiration is very often limited and hence much lower than potential evapotranspiration. [Pg.43]

This description suggests that it is extremely difficult to measure actual evapotranspiration directly. Indeed, for individual points this can only be done using costly micrometeorological measurements in the lowest layer of the atmosphere, or with the aid of weighing lysimeters that enable evapotranspiration to be determined on a small area of plant-covered ground using the water balance... [Pg.43]

If is frequently necessary to calculate evapotranspiration on the basis of climate and land use data. On the basis of the calculation of potential evapotranspiration, various procedures have been proposed with the aim of calculating actual evapotranspiration. There are a number of methods [68, 69]. [Pg.44]

In Austria, which is significantly lower lying (cf. Table 3), the evapotranspiration amounts to 510 mm a . On average the actual evapotranspiration is 90% of the potential evapotranspiration for the whole of Austria [70]. [Pg.44]

Fig. 20 North-south profiles indicating variation of mean annual precipitation, actual evapotranspiration and runoff (1973-1992) compared to relief Profile 1 from Basel to Sion (Valais), profile 2 from Schaffhausen to Ascona (Ticino) [27, 29, 49]... Fig. 20 North-south profiles indicating variation of mean annual precipitation, actual evapotranspiration and runoff (1973-1992) compared to relief Profile 1 from Basel to Sion (Valais), profile 2 from Schaffhausen to Ascona (Ticino) [27, 29, 49]...
Kling H, Nachtnebel HP, Fiirst J (2005) Mean annual areal actual evapotranspiration using water balance data. Map 3.3, Wien... [Pg.57]

Menzel L, Lang H, Rohmann M (1999) Mean Annual Actual Evapotranspiration 1973-1992. Hydrological Atlas of Switzerland. Plate 4.1, Bern... [Pg.90]

The main characteristic features of these ecosystems are related to the continental climate and low precipitation, precipitationipotential (and actual) evapotranspiration (PTE). P PE ranges between 0.6-0.3. In accordance with the given climatic conditions, the soils of steppe ecosystems (Chernozems, Kastanozems, Solonetzes) are characterized by the presence of a few buffer layers, such as humus, carbonate, and gypsum that makes them insensitive to actual and potential loads of pollutants. [Pg.318]

If basic calculations such as those presented are to be conducted, it is important to collect enough weather parameters to calculate reference evapotranspiration ETf). An on-site weather station should be considered a basic requirement minimum sensor requirements to calculate a Penman equation would include solar radiation, wind speed, relative humidity or actual vapor pressure, and air temperature. An on-site rain gauge is essential but it is also a good idea to have a rain gauge on the weather station even if it is not directly on-site. The most accurate variations of the Penman equation calculate Tq on an hourly basis. However, Penman routines using daily summaries are typically satisfactory for the purpose of calculating soil-water recharge. [Pg.888]

Error lack of balance in the measured terms ET Evapotranspiration (the actual amount, not potential amount)... [Pg.1087]

Fig. II. Mean values during weekly intervals of the rate of ammonia loss from a grazed ryegrass sward receiving 420 kg N ha 1yr 1 and the corresponding values for accumulated rainfall and potential evapotranspiration. The swards were grazed by yearling steers within a 28-day rotation. The numbered bars indicate each grazing period and the actual stocking rate (steers per ha) during that period. Fig. II. Mean values during weekly intervals of the rate of ammonia loss from a grazed ryegrass sward receiving 420 kg N ha 1yr 1 and the corresponding values for accumulated rainfall and potential evapotranspiration. The swards were grazed by yearling steers within a 28-day rotation. The numbered bars indicate each grazing period and the actual stocking rate (steers per ha) during that period.
The water recharge for the Maui fields was calculated with a simple hydrologic balance for each field using rainfall data from nearby rain gauges. Both fields were non-irrigated. A rainfall-runoff relationship was developed for each field using the USDA-Soil Conservation Service "curve number" approach. The validity of this approach for Hawaii conditions was demonstrated by Cooley and Lane (20). Potential evapotranspiration from pineapple fields was assumed to be one-third of pan evaporation throughout the study period, based on results of Ekern (21). but actual ET was adjusted for the water input for each month (3 ). [Pg.372]

The CENTURY model also includes a simplified water budget model that calculates monthly evaporation and transpiration water loss, water content of the soil layers, snow water content, and water flows between the soil layers. The main abiotic driver for the water budget model is the potential evapotranspiration rate, which is calculated as a function of the average monthly maximum and minimum air temperature. Near surface soil temperature is calculated as a function of maximum and minimum air temperatures, litter and standing plant biomass. The plant production model calculates potential plant production as a function of soil temperature and the ratio of actual water loss to potential water loss. Potential plant production is reduced when nutrients limit growth and the element that is most limiting for plant growth controls plant production. The nutrient... [Pg.329]


See other pages where Actual evapotranspiration is mentioned: [Pg.200]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.4426]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.4426]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.1065]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.11]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1067 , Pg.1070 , Pg.1075 , Pg.1078 , Pg.1079 ]




SEARCH



Actual

Actuality

Evapotranspiration

© 2024 chempedia.info