Absorbance band

Analytical methods for fortified soils were developed for the simultaneous quantitation of the trifluralin metabolites, 2,6-dinitro-A-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)-benzenamine (1) and 2,4-dinitro-A,A-dipropyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine (2) (Figure 2). The SFE method developed as described in Section 2.2.1 was extended to the determination of these metabolites. From soil fortified with 0.5-2.5 mg kg each of trifluralin, (1) and (2), the compounds were efficiently extracted by this procedure. Trifluralin and its metabolites (1) and (2) are characterized by absorbance bands in both the ultraviolet (UV) and visible ranges for HPLC however. 

The concentration of surface sites was measured by the integral intensity of the CO absorbance band using the formula C [pmol/g] = A/Aq, where A is the integral intensity of the CO stretching band and Aq is the coefficient of the integral absorbance [6]. Concentrations are measured to within 20%. 

Dealing with incomplete extraction is particularly challenging when analysing polymers containing unknown additive levels. A common strategy is to perform multiple extractions. When incomplete extraction is suspected, it is also useful to apply an alternative analysis technique, such as spectroscopy or elemental analysis. It is good practice to compare the IR spectrum of the polymer before and after extraction to verify the presence of absorbance bands related to the additive. 

With the development of more and more additives with closely similar absorbance bands UV analysis has lost its original role as a premier additive analysis technique. However, UV analysis can still be a very useful technique if one knows the exact additive package in a sample and there are no unknowns. Then the concentrations of the additives can be determined from the absorbance using Beer s law. 

ATR is one of the most useful and versatile sampling modes in IR spectroscopy. When radiation is internally reflected at the interface between a high-refractive index ATR crystal (usually Ge, ZnSe, Si, or diamond) and the sample, an evanescent wave penetrates inside the sample to a depth that depends on the wavelength, the refractive indices, and the incidence angle. Because the penetration depth is typically less than 2 pm, ATR provides surface specific information, which can be seen as an advantage or not if surface orientation differs from that of the bulk. It also allows one to study thick samples without preparation and can be used to characterize highly absorbing bands that are saturated in transmission measurements. 

Specular reflection IR spectroscopy has been used by Cole and coworkers to study the orientation and structure in PET films [36,37]. It has allowed characterizing directly very highly absorbing bands in thick samples, in particular the carbonyl band that can show saturation in transmission spectra for thickness as low as 2 pm. The orientation of different conformers could be determined independently. Specular reflection is normally limited to uniaxial samples because the near-normal incident light does not allow measuring Ay. However, it was shown that the orientation parameter along the ND can be indirectly determined for PET by using the ratio of specifically selected bands [38]. This approach was applied to the study of biaxially oriented PET bottles [39]. 

The carbonyl index is not a standard technique, but is a widely used convenient measurement for comparing the relative extent and rate of oxidation in series of related polymer samples. The carbonyl index is determined using mid-infrared spectroscopy. The method is based on determining the absorbance ratio of a carbonyl (vC = 0) band generated as a consequence of oxidation normalised normally to the intensity of an absorption band in the polymer spectrum that is invariant with respect to polymer oxidation. (In an analogous manner, a hydroxyl index may be determined from a determination of the absorbance intensity of a vOH band normalised against an absorbance band that is invariant to the extent of oxidation.) In the text following, two examples of multi-technique studies of polymer oxidation will be discussed briefly each includes a measure of a carbonyl index. 

Finally, a nonfluorescent YFP variant has been constructed for use as a FRET acceptor for GFP [89]. This allows the detection of the complete emission spectrum of GFP, while the FRET efficiency is high (R0 = 5.9 nm) due to strong overlap of the GFP fluorescence and YFP absorbance band. The occurrence of FRET was detected by a reduction in the excited state lifetime of the GFP by FLIM. The main disadvantage is that the presence of the acceptor cannot be detected in living cells. 

In the discussion group, it was conjectured that a single factor would split the difference the factor would take on some character of both absorbance bands, and would adjust itself to give less error than the non-linear band alone, but still not be as good as using the linear band. 

Other situations arise where that approach fails when the chemistry is unknown or too complicated (octane rating in gasoline, for example). Here again, even though a fair amount is known about the chemistry behind octane rating, there is no absorbance band for octane value . 

Certainly, nonlinearities in real data can have several possible causes, both chemical (e.g., interactions that make the true concentrations of any given species different than expected or might be calculated solely from what was introduced into a sample, and interaction can change the underlying absorbance bands, to boot) and physical (such as the stray light, that we simulated). Approximating these nonlinearities with a Taylor expansion is a risky procedure unless you know a priori what the error bound of the approximation is, but in any case it remains an approximation, not an exact solution. In the case of our simulated data, the nonlinearity was logarithmic, thus even a second-order Taylor expansion would be of limited accuracy. 

Figure 54-1 Two Gaussian absorbance bands and their respective first and second derivatives (finite differences). The top spectrum represents a synthetic Gaussian absorbance spectrum, the middle a first derivative and the bottom a second derivative . Note that the ordinate of the first derivative has been expanded by a factor of 10 and the second derivative by another factor of 10. The wavelength spacing between data points is 1 nm. The narrow band has a bandwidth (FWHH) of 20 nm, the broad one is 60 nm.

Figure 54-1, however, still shows a number of characteristics that reveal the behavior of derivatives. First of all, we note that the first derivative crosses the X-axis at the wavelength where the absorbance peak has a maximum, and has maximum values (both positive and negative) at the point of maximum slope of the absorbance bands. These characteristics, of course, reflect the definition of the derivative as a measure of the slope of the underlying curve. For Gaussian bands, the maxima of the first derivatives also correspond to the standard deviation of the underlying spectral curve. 

The negative sign in equations 54-19 and 54-20 reflect the fact that the maximum second derivative is a negative value, which also agrees with Figure 54-1, and it also tells us that the magnitude of the second derivative decreases inversely as the cube of a (for the Normal band shape) and inversely as the fifth power of a (for the Lorentzian band shape), that is as the bandwidth of the absorbance band increases. This explains why the derivatives of the broad absorbance band decrease with respect to the narrow absorbance band as we see in Figure 54-1, and more so as the derivative order increases. 

Figure 54-3 shows how this occurs. When the spacing is very wide, that is wider than the breadth of the absorbance band near the baseline, one of the points used to compute the difference is always on the baseline, while the other point rides over the peak and traces its shape. As the point of the derivative slides along the A-axis, eventually the two points exchange roles, and the other feature is traced out, but with the opposite sign. 

Figure 54-4 Second differences calculated using different spacings between the data points used to calculate the finite difference for the numerator term only, as an approximation to the derivative. The underlying curve is the 20 nm bandwidth absorbance band in Figure 54-1, with data points every nm. Figure 54-4a Difference spacings = 1-5 nm Figure 54-4b Spacings = 5 10 nm Figure 54-4c Spacings = 40-90 nm. (see Colour Plate 20)...

We also have noted before that adding or subtracting noisy data causes the variance to increase as the number of data points added together [2], The noise of the first derivative, therefore, will be larger than that of the underlying absorbance band by a factor of the square root of two. 

---