Zeta calculation

Note, how close the Slater exponent in cell D 2, returned by the SOLVER analysis, is to the effective atomic number of Hartree s calculation. Again, as chemists, we have a pleasing agreement, in the calculation, with the notion that the electrons screen each other from the full effect of the atomic number of protons in the nucleus. However, note, too, that the calculated results are not very good, especially when compared to the results of the double-zeta calculation in the previous section. 

The counterpoise correction typically overestimates the BSSE since the monomer basis set is enhanced not only by empty orbitals of the other fragment, but also by orbitals occupied by electrons of the other monomer molecule which are excluded by the Pauli principle. Thus, if CP-corrected and uncorrected interaction energies are plotted as function of basis set size, they approach from above and below, respectively, the true interaction energy at the complete basis set (CBS) limit. CP corrections are mandatory for all double-zeta calculations and with MP2 or CCSD(T) also for triple-zeta basis treatments. In triple-zeta basis set (e.g., cc-pVTZ or TZVPP) DPT calculations, the BSSE is typically less than 5-10% of the interaction energy which makes the laborious CP correction unnecessary. If sets of valence quadruple-zeta are used, it seems as if the error of the CP procedure is often similar to the (uncorrected) BSSE, but this is system-dependent and more definite conclusions about this issue requires further work. 

The sum is over all occupied levels. The valence orbitals 4> are those obtained from the STO-3G calculations, whereas the corresponding one-electron energies e are those determined from the double-zeta calculations. 

Calculate the zeta potential for the system represented by the first open square point (for pH 3) in Fig. V-8. 

Double zeta valence or triple zeta valence calculations can be carried out by putting DZV or TZV in place of STO NGAUSS = 3 in the second line of the INPUT file in the GAMESS implementation. The calculated energies become progressively lower (better) for double and triple zeta basis sets... 

Since the basis set is obtained from atomic calculations, it is still desirable to scale exponents for the molecular environment. This is accomplished by defining an inner valence scale factor and an outer valence scale factor ( double zeta ) and multiplying the corresponding inner and outer a s by the square of these factors. Only the valence shells are scaled. 

Calculations at the 6-31G and 6-31G level provide, in many cases, quantitative results considerably superior to those at the lower STO-3G and 3-21G levels. Even these basis sets, however, have deficiencies that can only be remedied by going to triple zeta (6-31IG basis sets in HyperChem) or quadruple zeta, adding more than one set of polarization functions, adding f-type functions to heavy atoms and d-type functions to hydrogen, improving the basis function descriptions of inner shell electrons, etc. As technology improves, it will be possible to use more and more accurate basis sets. 

This energy maximum is calculated from the electric surface potential. An approximation of this surface potential is the zeta potential, which is experimentally deterrnined with commercial instmments. For o/w emulsions with low electrolyte content in the aqueous phase, a zeta potential of 40 mV is sufficient to bring the energy maximum to this level. 

Rappe, Smedley and Goddard (1981) Stevens, Basch and Krauss (1984) Used for ECP (effective core potentitil) calculations Dunning s correlation consistent basis sets (double, triple, quadmple, quintuple and sextuple zeta respectively). Used for correlation ctilculations Woon and Dunning (1993)... 

Barone also introduces two new basis sets, EPR-Il and EPR-llI. These are optimized for the calculation of hyperfine coupling constants by density functional methods. EPR-Il is a double zeta basis set with a single set of polarization functions and an enhanced s part. EPR-III is a triple zeta set including diffuse functions, double d polarization functions and a single set off functions. 

The chemical bonding occurs between valence orbitals. Doubling the 1 s-functions in for example carbon allows for a better description of the 1 s-electrons. However, the Is-orbital is essentially independent of the chemical environment, being very close to the atomic case. A variation of the DZ type basis only doubles the number of valence orbitals, producing a split valence basis. In actual calculations a doubling of tire core orbitals would rarely be considered, and the term DZ basis is also used for split valence basis sets (or sometimes VDZ, for valence double zeta). 

Like Daw and Baskes, we use the double-zeta wave functions of Clementi and Roetti for the calculation of the effective electronic densities... 

DZ double-zeta STO HF Hartree-Fock limit STO AE all electrons PP pseudopotential, this calculation. Energies are in a.u., and DZ and HF results are from Reference 4. 

The starting point to obtain a PP and basis set for sulphur was an accurate double-zeta STO atomic calculation4. A 24 GTO and 16 GTO expansion for core s and p orbitals, respectively, was used. For the valence functions, the STO combination resulting from the atomic calculation was contracted and re-expanded to 3G. The radial PP representation was then calculated and fitted to six gaussians, serving both for s and p valence electrons, although in principle the two expansions should be different. Table 3 gives the numerical details of all these functions. 

From a basis set study at the CCSD level for the static hyperpolarizability we concluded in Ref. [45] that the d-aug-cc-pVQZ results for 7o is converged within 1 - 2% to the CCSD basis set limit. The small variations for the A, B and B coefficients between the two triple zeta basis sets and the d-aug-cc-pVQZ basis, listed in Table 4, indicate that also for the first dispersion coefficients the remaining basis set error in d-aug-cc-pVQZ basis is only of the order of 1 - 2%. This corroborates that the results for the frequency-dependent hyperpolarizabilities obtained in Ref. [45] by a combination of the static d-aug-cc-pVQZ hyperpolarizability with dispersion curves calculated using the smaller t-aug-cc-pVTZ basis set are close to the CCSD basis set limit. 

The calculation of zeta potential from electoviscous effect measures (Rubio-Hernandez et al. 1998 and 2004), is given by the equation... 

Rotational Barrier in Ethylene. It is well known that the rotational barrier of the ethylene molecule cannot be adequately described by a single reference Hartree-Fock calculation SCF calculations on this level resulted in values of 126 kcal/mole (30) and 129 kcal/mole (31) whereas the experimental value is 65 kcal/mole (32). Open-shell ab initio calculations of double zeta+polarization quality give the more acceptable value of 48 kcal/mole (33). Inclusion of correlation such as in CEPA calculations yield theoretical results within the experimental error bar (34), albeit at a considerable computational cost. 

Using local spin density functional (LSDF) theory, we obtain 70 kcal/mole for the rotational barrier of the ethylene molecule (35). In these calculations, we use the equivalent of a double-zeta+polarization basis set, i.e. for C two 2s functions. 

We have used the systems CnH +2 with n = 2,4,...,22, C H +2 with n = 3,5,...,21, and C H +2 with n = 4,6,...,22 to represent pure PA, positively charged solitons, and bipolarons respectively. SCF wavefunctions were calculated with a double-zeta quality basis set (denoted 6-3IG) and optimized geometries for all these systems were determined. In addition for the molecules with n up to 11 or 12 we calculated the vibrational spectrum, including infrared and Raman intensities. 

The calculations were performed using a double-zeta basis set with addition of a polarization function and lead to the results reported in Table 5. The notation used for each state is of typical hole-particle form, an asterisc being added to an orbital (or shell) containing a hole, a number (1) to one into which an electron is promoted. In the same Table we show also the frequently used Tetter symbolism in which K indicates an inner-shell hole, L a hole in the valence shell, and e represents an excited electron. The more commonly observed ionization processes in the Auger spectra of N2 are of the type K—LL (a normal process, core-hole state <-> double-hole state ) ... 

---