Self-consistent field wavefunctions

Although the program automatically applies standard defaults for many computational parameters, such as Initial guess wavefunction, self-consistent field (SCF) convergence criteria, Hessian refinement method, and so on. Jaguar allows the user full flexibility in tuning all settings. 

Multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) theory aims to optimize simultaneously the LCAO coefficients and the Cl expansion coefficients in a wavefunction such as... 

How does a rigorously calculated electrostatic potential depend upon the computational level at which was obtained p(r) Most ab initio calculations of V(r) for reasonably sized molecules are based on self-consistent field (SCF) or near Hartree-Fock wavefunctions and therefore do not reflect electron correlation in the computation of p(r). It is true that the availability of supercomputers and high-powered work stations has made post-Hartree-Fock calculations of V(r) (which include electron correlation) a realistic possibility even for molecules with 5 to 10 first-row atoms however, there is reason to believe that such computational levels are usually not necessary and not warranted. The Mpller-Plesset theorem states that properties computed from Hartree-Fock wave functions using one-electron operators, as is T(r), are correct through first order (Mpller and Plesset 1934) any errors are no more than second-order effects. 

What has been said applies to approximate as well as to ab-initio molecular orbital wavefunctions,i.e. those obtained by solving the self-consistent-field equations exactly. Hence, the localized orbital approach also offers an attractive tool for bridging the gap between rigorous quantitative calculations and qualitative chemical intuition. The experience gained so far has shown that interpretations suggested by the localized orbital picture correspond closely to intuitive chemical thinking. 

In view of the preceding considerations it should be emphasized that it is incorrect to talk about the self-consistent-field molecular orbitals of a molecular system in the Hartree-Fock approximation. The correct point of view is to associate the molecular orbital wavefunction of Eq. (1) with the N-dimen-sional linear Hilbert space spanned by the orbitals t/2,... uN any set of N linearly independent functions in this space can be used as molecular orbitals for forming the antisymmetrized product. 

In the self-consistent field linear response method [25,46,48] also known as random phase approximation (RPA) [49] or first order polarization propagator approximation [25,46], which is equivalent to the coupled Hartree-Fock theory [50], the reference state is approximated by the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field wavefunction < scf) and the set of operators /i j consists of single excitation and de-excitation operators with respect to orbital rotation operators [51],... 

The combination of modem valence bond theory, in its spin-coupled (SC) form, and intrinsic reaction coordinate calculations utilizing a complete-active-space self-consistent field (CASSCF) wavefunction, is demonstrated to provide quantitative and yet very easy-to-visualize models for the electronic mechanisms of three gas-phase six-electron pericyclic reactions, namely the Diels-Alder reaction between butadiene and ethene, the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of fulminic acid to ethyne, and the disrotatory electrocyclic ringopening of cyclohexadiene. 

However, despite their proven explanatory and predictive capabilities, all well-known MO models for the mechanisms of pericyclic reactions, including the Woodward-Hoffmann rules [1,2], Fukui s frontier orbital theory [3] and the Dewar-Zimmerman treatment [4-6] share an inherent limitation They are based on nothing more than the simplest MO wavefunction, in the form of a single Slater determinant, often under the additional oversimplifying assumptions characteristic of the Hiickel molecular orbital (HMO) approach. It is now well established that the accurate description of the potential surface for a pericyclic reaction requires a much more complicated ab initio wavefunction, of a quality comparable to, or even better than, that of an appropriate complete-active-space self-consistent field (CASSCF) expansion. A wavefunction of this type typically involves a large number of configurations built from orthogonal orbitals, the most important of which i.e. those in the active space) have fractional occupation numbers. Its complexity renders the re-introduction of qualitative ideas similar to the Woodward-Hoffmann rules virtually impossible. 

Finally, we note that if we retain two-particle operators in the effective Hamiltonian, but restrict A to single-particle form, we recover exactly the orbital rotation formalism of the multiconfigurational self-consistent field. Indeed, this is the way in which we obtain the CASSCF wavefunctions used in this work. 

Values of the MacLaurin coefficients computed from good, self-consistent-field wavefunctions have been reported [355] for 125 linear molecules and molecular ions. Only type I and II momentum densities were found for these molecules, and they corresponded to negative and positive values of IIq(O), respectively. An analysis in terms of molecular orbital contributions was made, and periodic trends were examined [355]. The qualitative results of that work [355] are correct but recent, purely numerical, Hartree-Fock calculations [356] for 78 diatomic molecules have demonstrated that the highly regarded wavefunctions of Cade, Huo, and Wahl [357-359] are not accurate for IIo(O) and especially IIo(O). These problems can be traced to a lack of sufficiently diffuse functions in their large basis sets of Slater-type functions. 

Self-consistent field results obtained with near-Hartiee—Fock wavefunctions of Clementi and Roetti [70] indicate similar patterns for Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni, Zn, Ge, Se, and Rr, namely, almost vanidiing integrals for = 2 andA = lOe [69]. A third point exists for krypton, forA = 28 e, where reaches a minimum [44]. 

The multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) method in which the expectation value /is treated variationally and simultaneously made stationary with respect to variations in the Q and Cv,i coefficients subject to the constraints that the spin-orbitals and the full N-electron wavefunction remain normalized ... 

For the benzenoid aromatic molecules considered here, we wish to include electron correlation for the N electrons of the 7t-eleetron system but not for the 2n a electrons. This is achieved most readily if we first carry out a standard Hartree-Fock MO theory calculation, yielding a set of orthogonal self-consistent field (SCF) molecular orbitals tp(. The spin-coupled wavefunction may then be written... 

The scientific interests of Huzinaga are numerous. He initially worked in the area of solid-state theory. Soon, however, he became interested in the electronic structure of molecules. He studied the one-center expansion of the molecular wavefunction, developed a formalism for the evaluation of atomic and molecular electron repulsion integrals, expanded Roothaan s self-consistent field theory for open-shell systems, and, building on his own work on the separability of many-electron systems, designed a valence electron method for computational studies on large molecules. 

The process is continued for k cycles till we have a wavefunction and/or an energy calculated from that are essentially the same (according to some reasonable criterion) as the wavefunction and/or energy from the previous cycle. This happens when the functions i/ (l), i//(2),. .., j/(n) are changing so little from one cycle to the next that the smeared-out electrostatic field used for the electron-electron potential has (essentially) ceased to change. At this stage the field of cycle k is essentially the same as that of cycle k — 1, i.e. it is consistent with this previous field, and so the Hartree procedure is called the self-consistent-field-procedure, which is usually abbreviated as the SCF procedure. 

Now, in the Hartree-Fock method (the Roothaan-Hall equations represent one implementation of the Hartree-Fock method) each electron moves in an average field due to all the other electrons (see the discussion in connection with Fig. 53, Section 5.23.2). As the c s are refined the MO wavefunctions improve and so this average field that each electron feels improves (since J and K, although not explicitly calculated (Section 5.2.3.63) improve with the i// s ). When the c s no longer change the field represented by this last set of c s is (practically) the same as that of the previous cycle, i.e. the two fields are consistent with one another, i.e. self-consistent . This Roothaan-Hall-Hartree-Fock iterative process (initial guess, first F, first-cycle c s, second F, second-cycle c s, third F, etc.) is therefore a self-consistent-field procedure or SCF procedure, like the Hartree-Fock procedure... 

---