Wavefunctions perturbation theory

To obtain an improvement on the Hartree-Fock energy it is therefore necessary to use Moller-Plesset perturbation theory to at least second order. This level of theory is referred to as MP2 and involves the integral J dr. The higher-order wavefunction g is... 

Two states /a and /b that are eigenfunctions of a Hamiltonian Hq in the absence of some external perturbation (e.g., electromagnetic field or static electric field or potential due to surrounding ligands) can be "coupled" by the perturbation V only if the symmetries of V and of the two wavefunctions obey a so-called selection rule. In particular, only if the coupling integral (see Appendix D which deals with time independent perturbation theory)... 

The first type of interaction, associated with the overlap of wavefunctions localized at different centers in the initial and final states, determines the electron-transfer rate constant. The other two are crucial for vibronic relaxation of excited electronic states. The rate constant in the first order of the perturbation theory in the unaccounted interaction is described by the statistically averaged Fermi golden-rule formula... 

If we used perturbation theory to estimate the expansion coefficients c etc., then all the singly excited coefficients would be zero by Brillouin s theorem. This led authors to make statements that HF calculations of primary properties are correct to second order of perturbation theory , because substitution of the perturbed wavefunction into... 

The spin Hamiltonian operates only on spin wavefunctions, and all details of the electronic wavefunction are absorbed into the coupling constant a. If we treat the Fermi contact term as a perturbation on the wavefunction theR use of standard perturbation theory gives a first-order energy... 

A comparison of the theory for EOM-CC properties, which empahsize eigenstates and generalized expectation values, and the derivative approach of CCLR has been presented. The usual form of perturbation theory for properties, employ only lower-order wavefunctions in their determination. CCLR involves consideration of wavefunctions of the same order as the energy of interest, but this ensures extensivity of computed properties. 

The perturbed energies and wavefunctions for the i-th system state can be expressed in a similar way as in scalar perturbation theory ... 

The wavefunction corrections can be obtained similarly through a resolvent operator technique which will be discussed below. The n-th wavefunction correction for the i-th state of the perturbed system can be written in the same marmer as it is customary when developing some scalar perturbation theory scheme by means of a linear combination of the unperturbed state wavefunctions, excluding the i-th unperturbed state. That is ... 

A computer program for the theoretical determination of electric polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilitieshas been implemented at the ab initio level using a computational scheme based on CHF perturbation theory [7-11]. Zero-order SCF, and first-and second-order CHF equations are solved to obtain the corresponding perturbed wavefunctions and density matrices, exploiting the entire molecular symmetry to reduce the number of matrix element which are to be stored in, and processed by, computer. Then a /j, and iap-iS tensors are evaluated. This method has been applied to evaluate the second hyperpolarizability of benzene using extended basis sets of Gaussian functions, see Sec. VI. 

In other words, the diagonal elements of the perturbing Hamiltonian provide the first-order correction to the energies of the spin manifold, and the nondiagonal elements give the second-order corrections. Perturbation theory also provides expressions for the calculation of the coefficients of the second-order corrected wavefunctions l / in terms of the original wavefunctions (p)... 

However, if this is not the case, the perturbations are large and perturbation theory is no longer appropriate. In other words, perturbation methods based on single-determinant wavefunctions cannot be used to recover non-dynamic correlation effects in cases where more than one configuration is needed to obtain a reasonable approximation to the true many-electron wavefunction. This represents a serious impediment to the calculation of well-correlated wavefunctions for excited states which is only possible by means of cumbersome and computationally expensive multi-reference Cl methods. 

Let us first inquire whether basic criteria for the validity of low-order perturbation theory are actually satisfied in the present case. As described in Section 1.4, the perturbative starting point is an idealized natural Lewis-structure wavefunction (t//,l )) of doubly occupied NBOs. The accuracy of this Lewis-type starting point may be assessed in terms of the percentage accuracy of the variational energy (E) or density (p(l ). as shown for each molecule in Table 3.20. 

Perturbative approximation methods are usually based on the Mpller-Plesset (MP) perturbation theory for correcting the HF wavefunction. Energetic corrections may be calculated to second (MP2), third (MP3), or higher order. As usual, the open- versus closed-shell character of the wavefunction can be specified by an appropriate prefix, such as ROMP2 or UMP2 for restricted open-shell or unrestricted MP2, respectively. 

The actual form of the Hamiltonian operator hp does not have to be defined at this moment. As in standard perturbation theory, it is assumed that the solution of the electronic structure problem of the combined Hamiltonian HKS +HP can be described as the solution y/(0) of HKS, corrected by a small additional linear-response wavefunction /b//(,). Only these response orbitals will explicitly depend on time - they will follow the oscillations of the external perturbation and adopt its time dependency. Thus, the following Ansatz is made for the solution of the perturbed Hamiltonian HKS +HP ... 

Both the initial- and the final-state wavefunctions are stationary solutions of their respective Hamiltonians. A transition between these states must be effected by a perturbation, an interaction that is not accounted for in these Hamiltonians. In our case this is the electronic interaction between the reactant and the electrode. We assume that this interaction is so small that the transition probability can be calculated from first-order perturbation theory. This limits our treatment to nonadiabatic reactions, which is a severe restriction. At present there is no satisfactory, fully quantum-mechanical theory for adiabatic electrochemical electron-transfer reactions. 

It has been well known for some time (e.g. [36]) that the next component in importance is that of connected triple excitations. By far the most cost-effective way of estimating them has been the quasiper-turbative approach known as CCSD(T) introduced by Raghavachari et al. [37], in which the fourth-order and fifth-order perturbation theory expressions for the most important terms are used with the converged CCSD amplitudes for the first-order wavefunction. This account for substantial fractions of the higher-order contributions a very recent detailed analysis by Cremer and He [38] suggests that 87, 80, and 72 %, respectively, of the sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-order terms appearing in the much more expensive CCSDT-la method are included implicitly in CCSD(T). 

Perhaps the simplest and most cost-effective way of treating relativistic contributions in an all-electron framework is the first-order perturbation theory of the one-electron Darwin and mass-velocity operators [46, 47]. For variational wavefunctions, these contributions can be evaluated very efficiently as expectation values of one-electron operators. 

By contrast the alternative approach of perturbation theory formulates an approximation for A in terms of the original single well wavefunctions as... 

Weak crystalline field //cf //so, Hq. In this case, the energy levels of the free ion A are only slightly perturbed (shifted and split) by the crystalline field. The free ion wavefunctions are then used as basis functions to apply perturbation theory, //cf being the perturbation Hamiltonian over the / states (where S and L are the spin and orbital angular momenta and. 1 = L + S). This approach is generally applied to describe the energy levels of trivalent rare earth ions, since for these ions the 4f valence electrons are screened by the outer 5s 5p electrons. These electrons partially shield the crystalline field created by the B ions (see Section 6.2). 

In general, the results of the perturbation theory based methods, SOPPA, SOPPA(CCSD), MPn and CCSD become smaller with increasing level of theory, whereas the results of the CASSCF/RASSCF calculations go through a maximum for the or °°°CAS wavefunctions depending on the molecule. 

---