Wavefunctions linear variation theory

Just as in linear variation theory, the coefficients can be determined using a secular determinant. But unlike the earlier examples using secular determinants, in this case some of the integrals are not identically zero or 1 due to orthonormality. In cases where there is an integral in terms of h(i) h(2) or vice versa, we cannot assume that the integral is identically zero. This is because the wavefunctions are centered on different atoms. The orthonormality conditions to this point are only strictly... 

Having now discussed how one can go about optimizing the electronic energy of an MCSCF wavefunction, we turn our attention to two special subclasses of this procedure the single-configuration SCF problem and the frozen-orbital Cl problem. Because we choose to view these situations as special cases of the above MCSCF problem, we obtain a specialized view of SCF and Cl theory. There already exist in the literature extensive and clear treatments of SCF and Cl as they are more commonly treated within the linear variational framework. Hence we have not attempted to cover the more conventional aspects of these topics here. 

Variational methods are at present used extensively in the study of inelastic and reactive scattering involving atoms and diatomic molecules[l-5]. Three of the most commonly used variational methods are due to Kohn (the KVP)[6], Schwinger (the SVP)[7] and Newton (the NVP)[8]. In the applications of these methods, the wavefunction is typically expanded in a set of basis functions, parametrized by the expansion coefficients. These linear variational parameters are then determined so as to render the variational functional stationary. Unlike the variational methods in bound state calculations, the variational principles of scattering theory do not provide an upper or lower bound to the quantity of interest, except in certain special cases.[9] Neverthless, variational methods are useful because, the minimum basis size with which an acceptable level of accuracy can be achieved using a variational method is often much smaller than those required if nonvariational methods are used. The reason for this is generally explained by showing (as... 

This form of variation theory is also best illustrated by example. Although the same idea can be applied to a trial wavefunction having any number of terms, a simple example involves the use of a two-term linear combination for the trial wavefunction ... 

Since in MCRPA the reference wavefunction is a variational MCSCF wave-function, one can derive the MCRPA also by application of linear response theory, Section 11.2, or of the quasi-energy derivative method, Section 12.3, to this MCSCF state. 

As in the developments of variation theory and perturbation theory, we make use of the fact that any valid wavefunction for a system can be formed as a linear combination of the eigenfunctions of a model Hamiltonian, in this case Hq. The task of solving the time-dependent differential Schrodinger equation is then converted to the task of finding the proper linear combination. The linear combination is made from the stationary states of the TDSE involving just Hq (Equation 9.6). Thus, for the Schrodinger equation. 

A special and powerful use of variation theory is with linear variational parameters. That means that the trial wavefunction is taken to be a linear combination of fimctions in some chosen set. The adjustable parameters are the expansion coefficients of each of these functions. This is, of course, a specialization of the way in which variation theory can be used, but it is powerful because the resulting equations take the form of matrix expressions. Solving the Schrodinger equation becomes a problem in linear algebra, and such problems are ideally suited to computer solution. 

Variation theory can be proven as follows. Take the trial wavefunction, H/triai, as a linear combination of the tme eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian,... 

Interatomic Force Constants (IFCs) are the proportionality coefficients between the displacements of atoms from their equilibrium positions and the forces they induce on other atoms (or themselves). Their knowledge allows to build vibrational eigenfrequencies and eigenvectors of solids. This paper describes IFCs for different solids (SiC>2-quartz, SiC>2-stishovite, BaTiC>3, Si) obtained within the Local-Density Approximation to Density-Functional Theory. An efficient variation-perturbation approach has been used to extract the linear response of wavefunctions and density to atomic displacements. In mixed ionic-covalent solids, like SiC>2 or BaTiC>3, the careful treatment of the long-range IFCs is mandatory for a correct description of the eigenfrequencies. 

We can now go back to the QM aspects of the PCM model by considering the methods for approximated solution of the effective non-linear Schrodinger equation for the solute. In principle, any variationedly approximated solution of the effective Schrodinger equation can be obtained by imposing that first-order variation of G with respect to an arbitrary vaxiar tion of the solute wavefunction is zero. This corresponds to a search of the minimum of the free energy functional within the domain of the variar tional functional space considered. In the case of the Hartree-Fock theory,... 

Using perturbation theory, Watson" has derived an expression, similar to eqn (20.31) but with rotation included, for a polyatomic molecule s vibration/ rotation energy levels. The analytic form for a prolate symmetric top has been given." This approach assumes the molecule has good vibration/rotation quantum numbers and, if this is not the case or if more accurate values for the energy levels are required, the variational method may also be used to determine vibrational/rotational energy levels. For this approach the wavefunction for a given vibration-rotation level is written as a linear combination of basis function j/iRjK -... 

CASSCF is a variant of multi-configuration self-consistent field (MCSCF) theory. This means that in addition to the Cl expansion coefficients being varia-tionally optimized, the orbitals determining the expansion are also variationally optimized. Thus, the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) coefficients defining the orbitals is simultaneously optimized. If one starts with, for example, Hartree-Fock orbitals, then after the MCSCF wavefunction is optimized the orbitals will (often) be quite different. MCSCF wavefunctions thus contain the optimum orbitals for the given Cl expansion. CASSCF involves choosing a subset... 

In the above equation, A is the antisymmetrizer, f (H) stands for the unperturbed wavefunctions of the host, and 1(G) is the wavefunction of the guest species that is determined variationally. On the other hand, the linear combination coefficients in Eq.(16) and the corresponding ground state energy are calculated using perturbation theory. The matrix elements of the relevant electronic Hamiltonian that includes the energy of the nuclear-nuclear repulsion read... 

---