Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wave-propagation measurement methods

Heat is the most common product of biological reaction. Heat measurement can avoid the color and turbidity interferences that are the concerns in photometry. Measurements by a calorimeter are cumbersome, but thermistors are simple to use. However, selectivity and drift need to be overcome in biosensor development. Changes in the density and surface properties of the molecules during biological reactions can be detected by the surface acoustic wave propagation or piezoelectric crystal distortion. Both techniques operate over a wide temperature range. Piezoelectric technique provides fast response and stable output. However, mass loading in liquid is a limitation of this method. [Pg.332]

Non-destructive methods include holographic interferometry, resistance transducers, stress-sensitive covers, and other similar techniques. In practice, the following physical methods of non-destructive monitoring of residual stresses are commonly used X-ray diffraction, measurement of dielectric properties, and ultrasonic control. The main purpose of these methods is to monitor the structural transformations or distortions taking place as a result of residual stresses and local deformations. However, the application of methods such as X-ray diffraction to measure distortions in unit cel dimensions, ultrasonics to measure elastic wave propagation velocities, etc., all encounter numerous experimental problems. Therefore, in ordinary laboratory conditions only quantitative estimations of residual stresses can be obtained. [Pg.95]

For thin shell structures, the most promising methods are those based in the analysis of the propagation of elastic waves. The wave propagation methods have often used piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) as transmitters to generate waves and simultaneously as receivers to measure the echo signals due to the defects. A time-frequency analysis allows an estimation of crack size on the basis of the relationship between new and baseline response. The sensitivity of Lamb waves to defects depends largely on the frequency, and for complex structures the dispersive Lamb waves interact with reinforcements with partial reflections and refractions. These systems have not reached the level of maturity required for industrial applications. A full discussion with alternatives is presented in the book by Giurgiutiu (2008). [Pg.332]

Only the studies of Sturtevant et al. have addressed the specific physical mechanisms by which liquid fragmentation occurs. The purpose of the present study is to explore this issue further (also in waves without upstream nucleation) using a rapid depressurization facility. The experimental methods are outlined in the following section, and the results for the quasi-steady and start-up regimes are presented in sections 3 and 4, respectively. Results concerning an absolute threshold for wave propagation are presented in section 5. Finally, our experimental measurements are summarized in section 6. [Pg.27]

The different experimental methods for sound wave propagation and for measuring the mechanical response or elastic constants of polymers are summarized below with an attempt to give an idea of the different time scales involved. [Pg.1022]

The moment tensor of each AE event can be evaluated if the displacements at a sufficiently large number of sensor positions are known. The displacement signal, which is emitted from the source, is distorted by the wave propagation in the specimen and by the sensor. Therefore, a well characterized material and sensor is crucial in evaluating the source mechanisms with the moment tensor method. For this reason, Manthei [2005] has emphasized rock and sensor characterization to be able to correct the measured signal amplitudes for wave attenuation, sensor directivity, and sensitivity. [Pg.291]

Sonic modulus n. The tensUe/compressive modulus ( ) estimated by measurement of sound-wave propagation in a material. ASTM Test C 769 (section 15.01) describes such a method. [Pg.903]

A comprehensive review of measurement techniques is presented by Capps (167), who also gives data for the complex Young s modulus for a range of polymers. This data includes the rubbery, transition, and glassy regions, and parameters for time-temperature superposition (eq. 45). The measiuement techniques fall broadly into three categories wave propagation methods, resonance methods, and forced-vibration nonresonance methods. The resonance and forced-vibration... [Pg.75]

The line-source technique is a transient method capable of very fast measurements. A line source of heat is located at the center of the sample being tested as shown in Fig. 4. The whole is at a constant initial temperature. During the course of the measurement, a known amount of heat is produced by the line source, resulting in a heat wave propagating radially into the sample. The rate of heat propagation is related to the thermal diffusivity of the polymer. The temperature rise of the line somce varies linearly with the logarithm of time. Starting with the Fourier equation, it is possible to develop a relationship which can be used directly to calculate the thermal conductivity of the sample from the slope of the linear portion of the curve ... [Pg.145]

Elastic Coefficients The elastic stiffness coefficients Cy can be calculated from the measured velocity of propagation of bulk acoustic ultrasonic waves, according to the Papadakis method (quartz transducer with center frequency of 20MHz) (Papadakis, 1967), on differently oriented bar-shaped samples using the equations given by Truell et al. (1969) and corrected for the piezoelectric contributions (Ljamov, 1983 Ikeda, 1990). The samples were oriented in axial directions XYZ, and 45° rotated against the X- and Y-axes, respectively. In order to obtain optimized values for the elastic materials parameters, the elastic stiffness coefficients Cy were used to calculate and critically compare the results of surface acoustic wave (SAW) measurements. [Pg.300]


See other pages where Wave-propagation measurement methods is mentioned: [Pg.147]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.859]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.245]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.127 ]




SEARCH



Propagating wave

Propagation measurement

Propagator measurement

Propagator method

© 2024 chempedia.info