WASTEWATER IS PROCESSED BY TREATMENT FACILITIES

In the next step, called primary ireatmem, the screened wastewater enters a large settling basin where solid particles too fine to have been caught by the. screen settle out as. sludge. After a period of time, the sludge is removed from the 

Tliis algal bloom consumes oxygen di.ssolved in the Wiiier and prevents atmo.splieric oxygen fiom mixing into the pond, thereby choking off aquatic life. 

In tlie ciry of Honolulu, about 280 million liters of wastewater pass through the largest of. several wastewater facilities each day. This water can be piped to depths of hundreds of motets below sea level, from where it continues to flow toward the bottom of the ocean. Water treatment requirements are therefore much less stringent than those at mainland facilities, where the effluent is not so easily discarded. 

A schematic for the screening and primary treatment steps in a municipal treatment facility. The rotating skimmer on the. settling basin removes any buoyant materials not captured in the. screening. step. 

A schematic for secondary treatment of wastewater from a municipal sewer system. 

Many municipalities also require tertiary treatment. There are a number of tertiary processes, most involving filtration of some sort. A common method is to pass secondary effluent through a bed of finely powdered carbon, which captures any remaining particulate matter and many of the organic molecules not removed in earlier stages. The advantage of tertiary treatment is greater protection of our water resources. Unfortunately, tertiary treatment is cosdy and ordinarily used only in situations where the need is deemed vital. 

---

Table 4.4 presents wastewater flow characterization for the foundry industry by casting metals. Also presented in this table is the level of process water recycle, and the number of plants surveyed with central wastewater treatment facilities for all of the processes at that plant. The discharge flow represents all processes within the specific metal casting facilities. 

The most widespread biological application of three-phase fluidization at a commercial scale is in wastewater treatment. Several large scale applications exist for fermentation processes, as well, and, recently, applications in cell culture have been developed. Each of these areas have particular features that make three-phase fluidization particularly well-suited for them Wastewater Treatment. As can be seen in Tables 14a to 14d, numerous examples of the application of three-phase fluidization to waste-water treatment exist. Laboratory studies in the 1970 s were followed by large scale commercial units in the early 1980 s, with aerobic applications preceding anaerobic systems (Heijnen et al., 1989). The technique is well accepted as a viable tool for wastewater treatment for municipal sewage, food process waste streams, and other industrial effluents. Though pure cultures known to degrade a particular waste component are occasionally used (Sreekrishnan et al., 1991 Austermann-Haun et al., 1994 Lazarova et al., 1994), most applications use a mixed culture enriched from a similar waste stream or treatment facility or no inoculation at all (Sanz and Fdez-Polanco, 1990). 

The high amounts in which these substances are consumed and produced have conferred illicit drugs and their human metabolites a pseudo-persistent character in the environment. Like over-the-counter and prescribed pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs are metabolized after consumption and different proportions of the parent compound and metabolic by-products are excreted via urine or feces and flushed into the sewage system toward wastewater treatment facilities, if existing. However, these substances are poorly or incompletely removed by conventional waste-water treatment processes [2, 3]. As a consequence, illicit drugs and metabolites are continuously introduced via wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents into the aquatic media. In fact, this constitutes the main route of entry of this type of compounds into the environment as direct disposal is unlikely. 

The crude paclitaxel is recovered from the rich aqueous fermentation broth by liquid/liquid extraction with a mixture of isobutyl acetate (IBA) and isopropanol (IPA), both class 3 solvents. The waste aqueous phase is stripped to remove residual organic solvents (IBA/IPA), treated with sodium hydroxide to deactivate any paclitaxel residues, and processed through a standard wastewater treatment facility. The amount of solid waste biomass generated in the process is negligible. 

The discharge of wastewater to a POTW is usually strictly controlled since the POTW itself is a permitted facility. Wastewater such as process wastewater, received from industrial facilities, must meet pretreatment standards so as not to compromise the treatment undertaken by the POTW. Usually, industrial wastewater is subjected to pH adjustment and has to meet carbon oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), and particulate content standards set in collaboration with the POTW. 

An aqueous waste stream leaving a process contains 10.0 wt% sulfuric acid and 1 kg nitric acid per kg sulfuric acid. The flow rate of sulfuric acid in the waste stream is 1000 kg/h. The acids are neutralized before being sent to a wastewater treatment facility by combining the waste stream with an aqueous slurry of solid calcium carbonate that contains 2 kg of recycled liquid per kg solid calcium carbonate. (The source of the recycled liquid will be given later in the process description.)... 

---