Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Vs. water content

Fig. 37. H diffusion coefficients for PFSA membranes vs. water content at 80 °C. Fig. 37. H diffusion coefficients for PFSA membranes vs. water content at 80 °C.
Fig. 7 Glass transition vs. water content relationship for amorphous indomethacin. Lines show fit to the Gordon-Taylor equation with K values of 0.33 (predicted) and 0.11... Fig. 7 Glass transition vs. water content relationship for amorphous indomethacin. Lines show fit to the Gordon-Taylor equation with K values of 0.33 (predicted) and 0.11...
Figure 3 represents the plot of viscosity vs. water content. It shows that as the amount of water decreases, the viscosity increases up to a water mass fraction of 0.56, and with further reduction in water content there is no significant change in viscosity. The decrease in viscosity in the region of water mass fraction greater than 0.56 is consistent with the dilution effect shown in the electrical conductivity measurements (Figure 2). [Pg.329]

Viscometric determination of Mj yielded a value of 1.78x10, confirming the nominal value. On boiling for 100 hr, the value of Mji was reduced by 20%, Since such a reduction would Increase the absolute values of FCP rate by an amount not greater than the maximum experimental error, and would not affect the general shape of the curve of FCP rate vs water content, a correction for degradation was not applied to the fatigue data. [Pg.535]

As an illustration of the effect of humid-gas-water concentration, a plot of maximum temperature vs, water content was made for runs 1 through 3. The plot of Figure 9 shows that the temperature excursions were effectively reduced as the water concentration decreased. Without inert-gas diluent, the temperature rise exceeded 750 F. A 1 to 1 dilution reduced the temperature excursions to 100°F. A further dilution of 9 to 1 decreased the temperature rise to less than 70 °F. [Pg.77]

Figure 3 Conductivity vs. water content for the W/O, bicontinuous, and O/W microemulsion regions of the SDS /7-C4H90H- -C7H,60H-H20 system. The SDS-U-C4H9OH U-C7H16OH weight ratio = 2.76 6.24 1.00, (From Ref. 34.)... Figure 3 Conductivity vs. water content for the W/O, bicontinuous, and O/W microemulsion regions of the SDS /7-C4H90H- -C7H,60H-H20 system. The SDS-U-C4H9OH U-C7H16OH weight ratio = 2.76 6.24 1.00, (From Ref. 34.)...
Figure 34 Ratio of bound water-to-total water content (volume of bound water divided by volume of total water) vs. water content. (From Ref. 141. With permission from Elsevier Science.)... Figure 34 Ratio of bound water-to-total water content (volume of bound water divided by volume of total water) vs. water content. (From Ref. 141. With permission from Elsevier Science.)...
Figure 17 Zeta potential measured electroacoustically for water droplets covered with AOT in heptane vs. water content. Figure 17 Zeta potential measured electroacoustically for water droplets covered with AOT in heptane vs. water content.
Fig. 14 Plots of proton conductivity, water content, and EW for various membranes, a Conductivity vs EW b water content (wt%) vs EW c conductivity vs water content (wt%)... Fig. 14 Plots of proton conductivity, water content, and EW for various membranes, a Conductivity vs EW b water content (wt%) vs EW c conductivity vs water content (wt%)...
A plot of Tg( K) vs. water content for PS-2806, SPP-34 and ALD-18127-7 acrylamide homopolymers showing the plasticizing effect of water. [Pg.21]

Figure 1.11 Diffusion coefficient, solubility, and permeability of oxygen vs water content for Nafion 211, measured at 100% RH, 30 psi O2 pressure. ... Figure 1.11 Diffusion coefficient, solubility, and permeability of oxygen vs water content for Nafion 211, measured at 100% RH, 30 psi O2 pressure. ...
Figure 6.253 Izod strength vs. water content for Solvay Ixef PAA resins [12]. Figure 6.253 Izod strength vs. water content for Solvay Ixef PAA resins [12].
Fig. 35. Fatigue life vs water content in extruded PMMA (Mw = 79,300) tested at 27.6 MPa and 2 Hz (158). Fig. 35. Fatigue life vs water content in extruded PMMA (Mw = 79,300) tested at 27.6 MPa and 2 Hz (158).
FIGURE 24-4 Saturated gas temperature vs water content. Note This curve applies only to saturated gas. [Pg.486]

Figure 4.14. Amount of hound and free water vs. water content in the membrane. [(a) Free water, (b) hound water.] (Reprcxluccd from [95] with permission.)... Figure 4.14. Amount of hound and free water vs. water content in the membrane. [(a) Free water, (b) hound water.] (Reprcxluccd from [95] with permission.)...
At higher temperature (383-39.1 K) some samples show a ftirther endotherm that is related to the fusion of amylose-lipid complexes, the presence of which depends on the vegetal source of tlie starch [60]. A clear interpretation comes from inspection of the diagram where the 7 g is plotted vs water content. [Pg.840]

Marty et al. [54] studied esterification activity vs. water content of the enzyme. They used Lipozyme/SCC02 and Lipozyme/ -hexane. They obtained sharp, bell-shaped curves. [Pg.808]


See other pages where Vs. water content is mentioned: [Pg.233]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.740]    [Pg.741]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.234 , Pg.235 , Pg.277 , Pg.278 ]




SEARCH



Water content

© 2024 chempedia.info