Vicker’s hardness test

Rockwell s hardness test works in a similar way to Brinell s hardness test, i.e., it uses the depth of penetration. Contrary to Brinell s method, however, it measures the penetration of a sphere while still under a load, and then measures the remaining elastic deformation. For this reason, the Rockwell method always gives lower degrees of hardness than the Brinell method. In addition, the degrees of hardness according to the Rockwell method are not measured in physical units, but in scale numbers of 0-120. Steel balls are used with soft materials, and diamond points with hard ones. The Vicker s hardness test uses a diamond pyramid. A modified Rockwell method is used for plastics. It should be noted that, with the Rockwell hardness thus determined, the plastic deformation contribution increases only gradually, because of creep. With metals, on the other hand, the deformation is always plastic, and therefore, also independent of time. Plastics, therefore, exhibit a relatively high Rockwell hardness compared to metals. 

Where H is Vickers s hardness, H extrapolated hardness at 0 K (called intrinsic hardness), T and T are room and test temperatures respectively, and t an empirical coefficient. The values of H and t are depend on the amount of additives or impurities, and grain size etc (Munro, 2000). 

Quantitative hardness tests slowly apply a fixed load to an indentor that is forced into the smooth surface of the specimen. After the load is removed, either the diameter across the impression or the depth of the impression is measured. The size of the penetration is proportional to the material s hardness. Rockwell, Brinnell, Vickers, and Knoop are well-known indentation hardness testing instruments. 

The hardness of a material typically represents its ability to resist indentation. Macroscopic hardness is usually measured by pressing a diamond tip (of known area A) into a solid, with a given load (force). The hardness //, often called Vicker s or Knoop hardness (which differ by the diamond tip geometry), is defined as // = W//4, where W is the load and A is the indented area. This is a destructive test The permanent indentation caused by the diamond is produced by breaking bonds and displacing atoms. A typical indentation profile is shown in Figure 8.1, and the Vicker s and Knoop hardnesses of several materials are listed in Tables 8.1 and 8.2. 

Static Indentation Tests, by far the most widely used, the most widely analyzed, and the most generous in the breadth of data they supply. A ball, cone, or pyramid is forced into a surface and the load per unit area of impression is considered the material s hardness. Several types of such tests are well known Brinnel, Vickers, Rockwell, and Knoop. 

The influence of fillers has been studied mostly at hl volume fractions (40-42). However, in addition, it is instructive to study low volume fractions in order to test conformity with theoretical predictions that certain mechanical properties should increase monotonlcally as the volume fraction of filler is Increased (43). For example, Einstein s treatment of fluids predicts a linear increase in viscosity with an increasing volume fraction of rigid spheres. For glassy materials related comparisons can be made by reference to properties which depend mainly on plastic deformation, such as yield stress or, more conveniently, indentation hardness. Measurements of Vickers hardness number were made after photopolymerization of the BIS-GMA recipe, detailed above, containing varying amounts of a sllanted silicate filler with particles of tens of microns. Contrary to expectation, a minimum value was obtained (44.45). for a volume fraction of 0.03-0.05 (Fig. 4). Subsequently, similar results (46) were obtained with all 5 other fillers tested (Table 1). 

The Bohme s disc method for petrochemical estimation of rocks now used appears to be equivalent to the dynamic abrasion method only for monolithic, monomineral rocks. For rocks softer than silica or those composed of minerals of distinct hardness, porous or partially weathered, no correlation is found between Bohme s method and Vickers hardness or any other hardness, and abrasive action on a surface 42-49 cm2 in area does not allow estimation of the structural and textural specificity of orientations in the rock under test. 

Mechanical and Chemical Characterization Enamel has often been viewed as a homogeneous solid [2, 3], but Knoop microhardness tests [4, 5] and compression tests [6] have shown that the Young s modulus (E) and hardness (H) are higher for cusp (or surface) enamel than for side (or subsurface) enamel. Depth-sensing Vickers indentation [7] has shown that the H and E obtained from an occlusal section of enamel are higher than those for an axial section. The variations in mechanical properties with location have been explained in terms of the degree of tissue mineralization. Notably,... 

The feature of fracture and its changes with microstructures were observed on a Hitachi S-570 scan electron microscope (SEM). The distribution of hardness was measured on a HV-120 Vickers Hardometer. The static Young s modulus, strength and extensibility of TiCp/2024 FGM were measured in the gradient direction, and as a comparison, the same properties of a uniform TiCp/2024 composite (non-FGM) were also measured on an electron mechanical universal material testing machine (Instron 1186). 

Hardness was estimated by Vickers indentation on sintered gradient samples, thermal expansion coefficient measurements and elastic behaviour was tested on the different dispersions. Preliminary mechanical testing (single edge notched beam, 3PB-SENB) and oxidation tests were performed on sintered FGM s. 

Light microscopy with Jenaphot 2000, X-ray diffraction analysis with a DRON-3X-ray diffractometer, measurement of Vickers hardness, and longterm hardness were used. The long-term hardness (1 hour at 1 kg load) was carried out at temperatures of 500 °C and 700 °C. Uniaxial tensile tests were done in a temperature range from RT to 800 °C in air at a strain rate of 710"3 s 1. 

Vickers hardness (HV) from RT to 800°C (hot hardness) was measured in a vacuum of 10"3 Pa at a 9.8 N load for 1 min. There is a valid reason to use the 1 min hardness for estimation of yield strength as Ctbend = HV/3 [5-7], As shown our compression tests at a strain rate of 6 -10"4 s"1 (Table 1), this estimation for the alloys under studying is quite efficient, and is valid within just a few percent.Bending tests were performed using three points technique on as-cast samples of 25 mm gauge length and 1x4 mm2 gauge section at ambient temperature. 

Mij] Thermal behavior tests, mechanical properties tests (incl. Vickers and Brinell hardness techniques), electrical conductivity measurements Thermal conductivity, thermal expansion, tensile strength, hardness, electrical conductivity. Young s modulus, fatigue behavior... 

The samples for the tensile tests were prepared according to the specifications of the Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS), No.l4B. The load-elongation curve was obtained for a crosshead speed of 1.0 nun/min. The hardness of the specimens was measured using the Vickers hardness method at 1 kgf for 15 s. 

---