Values unacceptable

Viscous heating effects play an important role in the measurement of viscosity using the slit rheometer. The increase of temperature due to viscous dissipation decreases the viscosity, making this value unacceptably from the estimation of the real effect of pressure on the rheology of the polymer. 

Knowing that sin(0) vanishes at0=n7i, for n=l,2,3,..., (although the sin(nTi) function vanishes for n=0, this function vanishes for all x or y, and is therefore unacceptable because it represents zero probability density at all points in space) one concludes that the energies Ex and Ey can assume only values that obey ... 

For different types of collections, this balance is differently defined. For example paper conservation treatments commonly undertaken in the museum conservation laboratory would be impractical in a Hbrary archive having a far greater collection size. The use of treatments for mass paper quantities would be unacceptable in the art museum. Documents in archives and books in Hbraries serve a different goal from art objects in a museum. Their use value Hes primarily in their information rather than in an intrinsic esthetic value. Whereas optimal preservation of that information value requires preservation of the object itself, a copy or even a completely different format could serve the same purpose. 

In this test, a rectangular strip sample is formed around a die with a precisely machined edge of a known radius. The sample is formed by 90° or 180° about an axis in the plane of the sheet. The outer surface of the bend is inspected for cracking or unacceptably deep surface mmpling for the particular appHcation. The minimum bending radius (MBR) about which strip can be successfully formed depends on the strip thickness, t, and is reported with the test thickness specified or normali2ed with regard to thickness as MBR/1. Better formabiHty is indicated by smaller MBR/1 values. 

An important practical question is, what is the representative pipe diameter in loading circuits comprising different sizes of pipe This has a large effect on the values calculated for velocity and velocity-diameter product. As an example, static ignition of ester mist in a rail car (5-1.3.1) involved 1450 gpm through a 6-in. pipe (v = 5 m/s and vd = 0.76 mVs) followed by a short 4-in. dip pipe assembly (y = 11 m/s and vd = 1.15 mVs). Were nonconductive liquid flow rate restrictions applied to the semiconductive ester (time constant —0.01 s) involved in this fire, the flow rate based on the 4-in. pipe would be unacceptably large based either on a 7 m/s maximum velocity or a 0.80 mVs maximum vd product. However, based on the 6-in. pipe upstream the flow velocity is less than 7 m/s and also meets API s vd < 0.80 mVs criterion. 

The example vehicle has been run through the test sequence using a two liter carbon canister and a 150 BV purge level. Fig. 22 presents the results for both a return and retum-less fuel system used in the vehicle. As shown, the fuel vapor temperature and the amount of fuel vapor generated are both lower for the retum-less system. This reduces the amount of HC adsorption required in the carbon canister, and it also reduces the amount of HC emissions in the test sequence, fhe return fuel system used with the stated purge volume and canister size emits an unacceptable level of HC during one of the diurnal sequences (2.12 grams), while the retum-less system emission values are well below the acceptable level. 

Efficiency As high as bubble caps in region of design, but falls to unacceptable values when capacity reduces below 60% (approximately)... 

In the following description and discussion of our results, various criteria derived from the literature are used to determine whether or not each sample is of adequate preservation to allow it to be confidently included in a stable isotope study. The values applied in the various criteria have been found to be associated with archaeological bone collagen that retained an isotopic composition that was reflective of its diet, while the majority of samples that had values outside of the criteria did not retain an isotopic composition that reflected diet. The values for these criteria may vary slightly depending upon the collagen extraction methodology used, and such criteria are not exact. In this study samples that fall within the criteria values are deemed acceptable, and those that do not are deemed unacceptable. ... 

The rejection of outliers is a deeply rooted habit techniques range from the haughty I know the truth attitude, to looks different from what we are used to, somebody must have made a mistake , to attempts at objective proof of having observed an aberration. The first attitude is not only imscientific, but downright fraudulent if unacceptable values are discarded and forgot-... 

We note in passing that the second root is unacceptable in connection with the possible negativity for some value of the parameters a and pg. Also, it will be sensible to introduce the notation h = y 7j To +. so that... 

The change of the anion results in alteration of enzymatic activity and also allows improvement in the enantioselectivity from an unacceptable level (1.1) to a synthetically useful value of 24. The cationic component of the IL also affects the activity and selectivity of the biocatalyst. Scheme 5.16 presents the study on the kinetic resolution of adrenaline-type aminoethanol in ILs [64]. 

Such sentinel workflow uses a prediction to select compounds for a more expensive screen that can confirm predicted hazards (liabilities, such as toxicity). It is, provably, the best workflow in contexts where a low prevalence of the hazard is anticipated, and where there is a backstop means further downstream (e.g., preclinical toxicity testing) for detecting hazards before humans are exposed. This workflow then allows the compounds predicted as safe to bypass the expensive hazards screen, without unacceptable risk, and can add significant value in terms of external screening costs or avoiding use of what may be a bottleneck resource. 

Values such as — 0, = -3, and y are unacceptable because they do not represent solutions to the Schrodinger equation, meaning that they do not correspond to reality. 

---