Validation and diagnostics

Daviaud ], Fournet D, Ballongue C, Guillem GP, Leblanc A, Casellas C, et al. ReUability and feasibility of pregnancy home-use tests laboratory validation and diagnostic evaluation by 638 volunteers. Clin Chem 1993 39 53-9. 

Equation (4.2) predicts a linear dependence of Efvs. A with a slope 1, and a linear dependence between Ef vs. log(o ) with a slope 2.303. These two dependencies can serve as diagnostic criteria to identify the electrochemical mechanism (4.1). Figure 4.4a shows the effect of different anions on the position of the net peak recorded at the three-phase electrode with a droplet configuration, where DMFC is the redox probe and nitrobenzene is the organic solvent. Figure 4.4b shows the linear variation of the net peak potential with A, with a slope close to 1. Recalling that the net peak potential of a reversible reaction is equivalent to the formal potential of the electrochemical reaction (Sect. 2.1.1), the results in Fig. 4.4 confirm the validity and applicability of Eq. (4.2). 

In conclusion, the authors of the cited studies all agree that further research into environmental risk assessment of hospital effluents, incorporating different types of substances used in care and diagnostic activities, as well as cleaning operations (pharmaceuticals, detergents, disinfectants, heavy metals, macropollutants), is vital. Moreover, further studies need to be focussed on evaluating the risk posed by pollutant mixtures, and work is needed to validate the predictive models proposed thus far [19, 49], to evaluate chronic toxicity due to PhCs and then-mixtures and to provide experimental data pertaining to specific case studies. 

In order to implement the control methodologies indicated, one needs proper measurements (sensors and diagnostics), controllers, and actuators. Extensive research and development are carried out to realize the most appropriate sensors and actuators for various applications. Diagnostics developed serve dual purpose to physically measure the various combustion parameters and interpret the results as quickly as possible, preferably in situ, so that the mechanisms involved can be understood and to validate the numerical computer codes so that... 

There are twa steps to validating an ICLS model. The first is to verify that the estimated puse spectra are reasonable the CLS model assumptions are then validated. Sewral diagnostic tools for validating the pure spectra are discussed, and a summary is found at the end of the section in Table 5.8. The primary use of these diagaostic tools is to investigate whether the estimated pure spectra are reasonaWc. 

Summary of Prediction Diagnostic Tools for SIMCA From the prediction diagnostics, the conclusion is that unknow.as 1 and 4 do not belong to either of the TEA or MEK classes. Sample 3 is a member of the TEA class and sample 2 is a member of the MEK class. There is considerable reliability in the classifications due to the large values for the excluded samples both in the validation and prediction phases. The residuals and score plots are consistent with the values. 

Weiner, Z., Reich, W., Herjanic, B., Jung, K.G., and Amado, H. (1987) Reliability, validity, and parent child agreement studies of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA)./ Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26 649-653. 

Most clinical trials study voluntary patients who enter a research setting and are kept drug-free for 1 or more weeks. Severely disturbed patients, however, are usually not candidates for research. Because psychiatry lacks valid and reliable biological diagnostic tests, we do not know whether a given patient really has the disease under study. Further, some of the symptomatic volunteers who are often used in outpatient studies may not actually have the disease. 

Furthermore, the disturbance is not due to physiological effects of a drug of abuse, medication, or general medical condition, is not better accounted for by brief psychotic disorder, and is not merely an exacerbation of a preexisting Axis I or Axis II disorder ( 252). This diagnostic category, however, has provoked considerable discussion about its validity and inclusion in DSM-IV (296, 297, 298, 299, 300 and 301). 

---