Vacuum plug flow

A system has been constructed which allows combined studies of reaction kinetics and catalyst surface properties. Key elements of the system are a computer-controlled pilot plant with a plug flow reactor coupled In series to a minireactor which Is connected, via a high vacuum sample transfer system, to a surface analysis Instrument equipped with XFS, AES, SAM, and SIMS. When Interesting kinetic data are observed, the reaction Is stopped and the test sample Is transferred from the mlnlreactor to the surface analysis chamber. Unique features and problem areas of this new approach will be discussed. The power of the system will be Illustrated with a study of surface chemical changes of a Cu0/Zn0/Al203 catalyst during activation and methanol synthesis. Metallic Cu was Identified by XFS as the only Cu surface site during methanol synthesis. 

Both the mass-transfer approach as well as the diffusion approach are required to describe the influence of mass transport on the overall polycondensation rate in industrial reactors. For the modelling of continuous stirred tank reactors, the mass-transfer concept can be applied successfully. For the modelling of finishers used for polycondensation at medium to high melt viscosities, the diffusion approach is necessary to describe the mass transport of EG and water in the polymer film on the surface area of the stirrer. Those tube-type reactors, which operate close to plug-flow conditions, allow the mass-transfer model to be applied successfully to describe the mass transport of volatile compounds from the polymer bulk at the bottom of the reactor to the high-vacuum gas phase. 

Conversion to Murphree Tray Efficiency. For complete liquid mixing on the tray, as found in small columns (e.g., Oldershaws) and in some vacuum columns where the volumetric flow of vapor is much higher than that of the liquid, Eog = Emv- For the opposite case of plug flow of liquid across the tray. 

In this chapter the focus is on reactors. First we introduce the general factors that affect the selection of the reactor. In Section 6.2 are given general guidelines. Section 6.3 considers details for different types of reactions that affect the size of the reactor. The rest of the chapter discusses some specifics about the different types of reactor. Section 6.4 considers burners. Plug flow tubular reactors, PFTR, are considered in Sections 6.5 to 6.26. Stirred tanks reactors, STR, are considered in Section 6.27 to 6.33. Finally Sections 6.34 to 6.37 explore combining reactors with other unit operations such as distillation, extmsion, membranes and vacuum pumps. 

Cryogenic cold traps in Zone 2A. (Capture process radioactive noble gas in the vacuum system flow to control release.) Plugged trap or broken vacuum line Mechanical malfunction or worker error Control and monitoring system indications and periodic maintenance inspections Redundant cold traps provide multiple flow paths for vacuum. Loss of vacuum and potential release of noble gas. 

A detailed flow diagram for the cross-flow model derived by Weller and Steiner (W3, W4) is shown in Fig. 13.6-1. In this case the longitudinal velocity of the high-pressure or reject stream is large enough so that this gas stream is in plug flow and flows parallel to the membrane. On the low-pressure side the permeate stream is almost pulled into vacuum, so that the flow is essentially perpendicular to the membrane. 

In the TAP reactor system the reactor can be isolated from the vacuum system via a slide valve. When the slide valve is closed, the microreactor can be operated as a continuous plug flow-type... 

As seen in Section 17.2.1. the total pressure difference during powder conveying depends on the amount of material in the conveying hne. Basically at vacuum conveying three different types of conditions can be described (Figure 17.5) dilute phase, dense phase and plug flow conveying [4]. 

For example, different fermentation schemes have been developed for the production of ethanol. Conventional batch, continuous, cell recycle and immobilized cell processes, as well as membrane, extraction and vacuum processes, which selectively remove ethanol from the fermentation medium as it is formed, were compared on identical bases using a consistent model for yeast metabolism (Maiorella et al., 1984). The continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with cell recycle, tower and plug flow reactors all showed similar cost savings of about 10% compared to batch fermentation. Cell recycle increases cell density inside the fermentor, which is important in reducing fermentation cost. 

---