Upper levels variability

Figure Bl.10.2. Schematic diagram of a counting experiment. The detector intercepts signals from the source. The output of the detector is amplified by a preamplifier and then shaped and amplified friitlier by an amplifier. The discriminator has variable lower and upper level tliresholds. If a signal from the amplifier exceeds tlie lower tlireshold while remaming below the upper tlireshold, a pulse is produced that can be registered by a preprogrammed counter. The contents of the counter can be periodically transferred to an online storage device for fiirther processing and analysis. The pulse shapes produced by each of the devices are shown schematically above tlieni.

Fig. 4. Response surface showing the variation in yield when hydrogen pressure and stirring rate was varied in the catalytic hydrogenation of furan. The twist due to an interaction effect is clearly seen. The remaining variables were set to their upper levels...

Besides the main effects, i.e. the effects caused by the variables as such, interaction effects can also occur. For instance, one can consider two-factor interactions, three-factor interactions, etc. A two-factor interaction (e.g. a iati) occurs when the effect of factor x is different at both levels of factor att (or vice versa) a three-factor interaction when a two-factor interaction is different at both levels of the third. In our example, B clearly has no effect at the upper level of A, but it has an effect at the lower level the retention times are larger at the B-level. There is therefore an effect of B and an interaction between A and B. In general, main effects tend to be larger than two-factor interactions, two-factor interactions larger than three-factor interactions, and so on. In the example too, the effect of A is by far the largest. 

Factor Associated variable Lower level (coded -1) Upper level (coded +1)... 

In the second column how the experimental variables used are set in the experiment are given in a short form, i.e., for the lower level, and -I- for the upper level. The actual setting can be easily looked up for the upper part of the table. 

As stated previously, the resulting sensed variable signal is compared at the controller to a desired level, or set point, for that variable. The set point is established by the plant operator or by an upper-level control system. Any error (difference) between these values is used by the controller to compute the correction to the controller output, which is transmitted to the valve or other actuator of the system s parameters. 

Table A.17 Resolution V design for 6 dichotomous variables ("-1" encodes the variable s lower level and " 1" the upper level)...

The synoptic case during April 18-21, 1999 was characterized by an upper trough located in the northern part of the area of interest. There was a small pressure gradient field at lower levels. This synoptic case produces a light variable wind near the surface, and a much more intensive westerly wind at upper levels. Fronts were observed during April 18-20 followed by heavy rain, thunderstorms, and intense wind (17 m s ) from a westerly direction. 

In order to communicate between the upper level control and the lower level control, we introduce a state variable command. If the value of command is stop then LCM sets the values of speed of motors to 0. The revised version of LCM is shown in the left of Figure 4. 

The idea behind multiveuiate hierarchical modeling is very simple. Take one model dimension (component) of an existing projection method, say PLS (two-block), and substitute each variable by a score vector from a block of variables. We call these score vectors superveuiables . On the upper level of the model, a simple relationship, a supermodel , between rather few supervariables is developed. In the lower layer of the model, the details of the blocks are modeled by block models as block scores time block loadings. Conceptually this corresponds to seeing each block as an entity, and then developing PLS models between the superblocks . The lower level provides the variables (block scores) for these block relationships. 

This blocking leads to two model levels the upper level where the relationships between blocks are modeled, and the lower level showing the details of each block. On each level, standard PLS or PC scores and loading plots, as well as residuals and their summaries such as DModX, are available for the model interpretation. This allows an interpretation focused on pertinent blocks and their dominating variables. For further details the reader is referred to Wold et al. ... 

A short pump pulse excites coherently different upper levels. The time evolution of the superposition of states following the coherent excitation causes time-dependent changes of the complex susceptibility x of the sample. Similar to the quantum beats in the fluorescence intensity the susceptibility x(t) is found to contain oscillating nonisotropic contributions which can be readily detected by placing the sample between crossed polarizers and transmitting a probe pulse with variable delay (see also Sect.10.3 on polarization spectroscopy). Even a cw broadband dye laser can be used for probing if the probe intensity transmitted by the polarizer is monitored with sufficient time resolution. 

The Central Composite Design allows to estimate the constant, the linear terms and the interactions between the variables and the quadratic terms according to the following model (usually, in case of more than two variables, the upper-level interactions are not taken into accotmt) ... 

The use of high or low limits for process variables is another type of selective control, called an override. The feature of anti-reset windup in feedback controllers is a type of override. Another example is a distillation column with lower and upper limits on the heat input to the column reboiler. The minimum level ensures that liquid will remain... 

---