Unrestricted Hartree-Fock functions

The simplest approximate wavefunction for an open-shell molecule is the spin-unrestricted Hartree-Fock function... 

Local spin density functional theory (LSDFT) is an extension of regular DFT in the same way that restricted and unrestricted Hartree-Fock extensions were developed to deal with systems containing unpaired electrons. In this theory both the electron density and the spin density are fundamental quantities with the net spin density being the difference between the density of up-spin and down-spin electrons ... 

There are two techniques for constructing HF wave functions of molecules with unpaired electrons. One technique is to use two completely separate sets of orbitals for the a and P electrons. This is called an unrestricted Hartree-Fock... 

Quantum mechanics calculations use either of two forms of the wave function Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) or Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF). Use the RHF wave function for singlet electronic states, such as the ground states of stable organic molecules. 

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. 

Wood, J. H., and Pratt, G. W., Phys. Rev. 107, 995, "Wave functions and energy levels for Fe as found by the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method."... 

In the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method, a single-determinant wave function is used with different molecular orbitals for a and jS spins, and the eigenvalue problem is solved with separate F and F matrices. With the zero differential overlap approximation, the F matrix elements (25) become... 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

Just as in the unrestricted Hartree-Fock variant, the Slater determinant constructed from the KS orbitals originating from a spin unrestricted exchange-correlation functional is not a spin eigenfunction. Frequently, the resulting (S2) expectation value is used as a probe for the quality of the UKS scheme, similar to what is usually done within UHF. However, we must be careful not to overstress the apparent parallelism between unrestricted Kohn-Sham and Hartree-Fock in the latter, the Slater determinant is in fact the approximate wave function used. The stronger its spin contamination, the more questionable it certainly gets. In... 

In diamond, Sahoo et al. (1983) investigated the hyperfine interaction using an unrestricted Hartree-Fock cluster method. The spin density of the muon was calculated as a function of its position in a potential well around the T site. Their value was within 10% of the experimental number. However, the energy profiles and spin densities calculated in this study were later shown to be cluster-size dependent (Estreicher et al., 1985). Estreicher et al., in their Hartree-Fock approach to the study of normal muonium in diamond (1986) and in Si (1987), found an enhancement of the spin density at the impurity over its vacuum value, in contradiction with experiment this overestimation was attributed to the neglect of correlation in the HF method. 

The ordinary unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) function is not written like either of these. It is not a pure spin state (doublet) as are these functions. The spin coupled VB (SCVB) function is lower in energy than the UHF in the same basis. 

We shall now follow the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) formalism to obtain a restricted high-spin open-shell functions as proposed in [34], [35]. In order to eliminate spin contamination in the UHF function f i, the following spin purity constraint is imposed on the spatial orbitals ... 

The version of HF theory we have been studying is called unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) theory. It is appropriate to all molecules, regardless of the number of electrons and the distribution of electron spins (which specify the electronic state of the molecule). The spin must be taken into account when the exchange integrals are being evaluated since if the two spin orbitals involved in this integral did not have the same spin function, a or ft, the integral value is zero by virtue of the orthonormality of the electron spin functions... 

---