Unrestricted Hartree Fock

Choose LHH(spin Unrestricted Hartree-Fock) or RHF (spin Restricted Ilartree-Fock) calculations according to your molecular system. HyperChem supports UHF for both open-sh el I and closed-shell calcii lation s an d RHF for cUised-shell calculation s on ly, Th e closed-shell LHFcalculation may be useful for studyin g dissociation of m olectilar system s. ROHF(spin Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock) is not supported in the current version of HyperChem (for ah initio calculations). 

Local spin density functional theory (LSDFT) is an extension of regular DFT in the same way that restricted and unrestricted Hartree-Fock extensions were developed to deal with systems containing unpaired electrons. In this theory both the electron density and the spin density are fundamental quantities with the net spin density being the difference between the density of up-spin and down-spin electrons ... 

III. The Unrestricted Hartree-Fock Spin Impurity Problem... 

There are two techniques for constructing HF wave functions of molecules with unpaired electrons. One technique is to use two completely separate sets of orbitals for the a and P electrons. This is called an unrestricted Hartree-Fock... 

Tripos a molecular mechanics force field, also the name of a company that sells computational chemistry software TST (transition state theory) method for computing rate constants UHF (unrestricted Hartree-Fock)... 

Quantum mechanics calculations use either of two forms of the wave function Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) or Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF). Use the RHF wave function for singlet electronic states, such as the ground states of stable organic molecules. 

A more general way to treat systems having an odd number of electrons, and certain electronically excited states of other systems, is to let the individual HF orbitals become singly occupied, as in Figure 6.3. In standard HF theory, we constrain the wavefunction so that every HF orbital is doubly occupied. The idea of unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) theory is to allow the a and yS electrons to have different spatial wavefunctions. In the LCAO variant of UHF theory, we seek LCAO coefficients for the a spin and yS spin orbitals separately. These are determined from coupled matrix eigenvalue problems that are very similar to the closed-shell case. 

Here, occ means occupied and virt means virtual. In the restricted Hartree-Fock model, each orbital can be occupied by at most one a spin and one (i spin electron. That is the meaning of the (redundant) Alpha in the output. In the unrestricted Hartree-Fock model, the a spin electrons have a different spatial part to the spin electrons and the output consists of the HF-LCAO coefficients for both the a spin and the spin electrons. 

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. 

Unrestricted Hartree-Fock Scheme. Exchange Polarization. 313... 

This means that one has to be extremely careful in making physical interpretations of the results of the unrestricted Hartree-Fock scheme, even if one has selected the pure spin component desired. In many cases, it is probably safer to carry out an additional variation of the orbitals for the specific spin component under consideration, i.e., to go over to the extended Hartree-Fock scheme. In the unrestricted scheme, one has obtained mathematical simplicity at the price of some physical confusion—in the extended scheme, the physical simplicity is restored, but the corresponding Hartree-Fock equations are now more complicated to solve. We probably have to accept these mathematical complications, since it is ultimately the physics of the system we are interested in. 

Pratt, G. W., Jr., Phys. Rev. 102, 1303, "Unrestricted Hartree-Fock method." The basis of the method with an example on the Li atom. 

Unrestricted Hartree-Fock method, 231 IJnsaturated hydrocarbons, polarizability, 76... 

Scheme 83 and crystallographically characterized. With 2.942(2) A the Ti-Ti distance in the molecule is fairly short, and ab initio unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculations suggested the presence of a Ti-Ti bonding interaction. 

For the UHF calculations the undectet implies = 5 (septet implies 3z = 3) and the electrons are assigned as suggested by the ROHF calculation. For the 5 = 0 case the electrons are assigned to be AF coupled. The Projected Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (PUHF) energies correspond to the fully projected UHF values with 3 = 5. A brief overview of the PUHF method is given below, a more detailed description can be found in Reference 4. 

In the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method, a single-determinant wave function is used with different molecular orbitals for a and jS spins, and the eigenvalue problem is solved with separate F and F matrices. With the zero differential overlap approximation, the F matrix elements (25) become... 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

The most famous case concerns the symmetry breaking in the Hartree-Fock approximation. The phenomenon appeared on elementary problems, such as H2, when the so-called unrestricted Hartree-Fock algorithms were tried. The unrestricted Hartree-Fock formalism, using different orbitals for a and p electrons, was first proposed by G. Berthier [5] in 1954 (and immediately after J.A. Pople [6] ) for problems where the number of a andp electrons were different. This formulation takes the freedom to deviate from the constraints of being an eigenfunction. 

In addition, since the HPHF wavefunction exhibits a two-determinantal form, this model can be used to describe singlet excited states or triplet excited states in which the projection of the spin momentum Ms=0. The HPHF approximation appears thus as a simple method for the direct determination of excited states (with Afs=0)such as the usual Unrestricted Hartree Fock model does for determining triplet excited states with Ms = 1. 

In this expression, the Fa operator is the usual Fock operator of the Unrestricted Hartree-Fock method [14] ... 

The wave funetion obtained eorresponds to the Unrestricted Hartree-Fock scheme and beeomes equivalent to the RHF ease if the orbitals (t>a and (()p are the same. In this UHF form, the UHF wave funetion obeys the Pauli prineiple but is not an eigenfunction of the total spin operator and is thus a mixture of different spin multiplicities. In the present two-eleetron case, an alternative form of the wave funetion which has the same total energy, which is a pure singlet state, but whieh is no longer antisymmetric as required by thePauli principle, is ... 

Table 3 Unrestricted Hartree-Fock energies (Hartrees) for Ceo and C70 and their muon adducts, muon in atomic units (and MHz) after quartet spin state annihilation. The value of the total spin operator, < >, is also given after quartet spin state...

Just as in the unrestricted Hartree-Fock variant, the Slater determinant constructed from the KS orbitals originating from a spin unrestricted exchange-correlation functional is not a spin eigenfunction. Frequently, the resulting (S2) expectation value is used as a probe for the quality of the UKS scheme, similar to what is usually done within UHF. However, we must be careful not to overstress the apparent parallelism between unrestricted Kohn-Sham and Hartree-Fock in the latter, the Slater determinant is in fact the approximate wave function used. The stronger its spin contamination, the more questionable it certainly gets. In... 

Figure 5-1. H2 potential curves computed within the restricted and unrestricted Hartree-Fock (RHF and UHF) and Kohn-Sham (RKS and UKS) formalisms. 

---