Unitary transformation theory

Among the usual advantages of such expressions as Eq. (7-80) and (7-81), one is salient they show forth the invariance of p and w with respect to the choice of the basis functions, u, in terms of which p, a, and P are expressed. The trace, as will be recalled, is invariant against unitary transformations, and the passage from one basis to another is performed by such transformations. The trace is also indifferent to an exchange of the two matrix factors, which is convenient in calculations. Finally, the statistical matrix lends itself to a certain generalization of states from pure cases to mixtures, required in quantum statistics and the theory of measurements we turn to this question in Section 7.9. 

As indicated at the beginning of the last section, to say that quantum electrodynamics is invariant under space inversion (x = ijX) means that we can find new field operators tfi (x ),A v x ) expressible in terms of fj(x) and A nix) which satisfy the same equations of motion and commutation rules with respect to the primed coordinate system (a = igx) as did tf/(x) and Av(x) in terms of x. Since the commutation rules are to be the same for both sets of operators and the set of realizable states must be invariant, there must exist a unitary (or anti-unitary) transformation connecting these two sets of operators if the theory is invariant. For the case of space inversions, such a unitary operator is... 

Invariance of the trace of a matrix under unitary transformation corresponds to the invariance of phase density under canonical transformation in classical theory. 

On matrix form the non-unitary transformations (27) and (30) of the previous section are easily extended to the complete Hamiltonian and have therefore allowed relativistic and non-relativistic spin-free calculations of spectroscopic constants and first-order properties at the four-component level (see, for instance. Refs. [45 7]). In this section, we consider the elimination of spin-orbit interaction in four-component calculations of second-order electric and magnetic properties. Formulas are restricted to the Hartree-Fock [48] or Kohn-Sham [49] level of theory, but are straightforwardly generalized. 

The localized many-body perturbation theory (LMBPT) applies localized HF orbitals which are unitary transforms of the canonical ones in the diagrammatic many-body perturbation theory. The method was elaborated on models of cyclic polyenes in the Pariser-Parr-Pople (PPP) approximation. These systems are considered as not well localized so they are suitable to study the importance of non local effects. The description of LMBPT follows the main points as it was first published in 1984 (Kapuy etal, 1983). 

Importantly, the anti-Hermitian CSE may be evaluated through second order of a renormalized perturbation theory even when the cumulant 3-RDM is neglected in the reconstruction. The anti-Hermitian part of the CSE [27, 31, 63] is the stationary condition for two-body unitary transformations of the A-particle wave-function [31, 32], and hence the two-body unitary transformations may easily be evaluated with the anti-Hermitian CSE and RDM reconstruction without the many-electron Schrodinger equation. The contracted Schrodinger equation in conjunction with the concepts of reconstruction and purification provides a new, important approach to computing the 2-RDM directly without the many-electron wavefunction. 

M. D. Benayoun and A. Y. Lu, Invariance of the cumulant expansion under l-particle unitary transformations in reduced density matrix theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 387, 485 (2004). 

Both the effective valence Hamiltonian method [31, 32] and unitary coupled cluster [33-35] employ a single two-body unitary transformation. In the effective valence Hamiltonian method [31, 32], the unitary transformation, selected by perturbation theory, is applied to the Hamiltonian to produce an effective... 

Up to this point our discussion of canonical transformations has been exact. We now proceed to the specific approximations that characterize our formulation of CT theory and discuss their relationship with approximations commonly made in other theories involving canonical (i.e., unitary) transformations. 

To summarize the theory dynamic correlations are described by the unitary operator exp A acting on a suitable reference funchon, where A consists of excitation operators of the form (4). We employ a cumulant decomposition to evaluate all expressions in the energy and amphtude equations. Since we are applying the cumulant decomposition after the first commutator (the term linear in the amplimdes), we call this theory linearized canonical transformation theory, by analogy with the coupled-cluster usage of the term. The key features of the hnearized CT theory are summarized and compared with other theories in Table II. 

Features of Some Theories that Use the Language of Canonical/Unitary Transformations... 

In addition to the encouraging numerical results, the canonical transformation theory has a number of appealing formal features. It is based on a unitary exponential and is therefore a Hermitian theory it is size-consistent and it has a cost comparable to that of single-reference coupled-cluster theory. Cumulants are used in two places in the theory to close the commutator expansion of the unitary exponential, and to decouple the complexity of the multireference wave-function from the treatment of dynamic correlation. 

In this manner, we have arrived at the Pernal nonlocal potential [81]. It can be shown, using the invariance of Vee with respect to an arbitrary unitary transformation and its extremal properties [13] or by means of the first-order perturbation theory applied to the eigenequation of the 1-RDM [81], that the off-diagonal elements of Uee may also be derived via the functional derivative... 

In the language of control theory, Tr[p(0)P] is a kinematic critical point [87] if Eq. (4.159) holds, since Tr[e p(0)e- P] = Tr[p(0)P] + Tr(7/[p(0),P]) + O(H ) for a small arbitrary system Hamiltonian H. Since we consider p in the interaction picture, Eq. (4.159) means that the score is insensitive (in first order) to a bath-induced unitary evolution (i.e., a generalized Lamb shift) [88]. The purpose of this assumption is only to simplify the expressions, but it is not essential. Physically, one may think of a fast auxiliary unitary transformation that is applied initially in order to diagonalize the initial state in the eigenbasis of P. 

In the preceding sections, the occupation vectors were defined by the occupation of the basis orbitals jJ>. In many cases it is necessary to study occupation number vectors where the occupation numbers refer to a set of orbitals cfe, that can be obtained from by a unitary transformation. This is, for example, the case when optimizing the orbitals for a single or a multiconfiguration state. The unitary transformation of the orbitals is obtained by introducing operators that carry out orbital transformations when working on the occupation number vectors. We will use the theory of exponential mapping to develop operators that parameterizes the orbital rotations such that i) all sets of orthonormal orbitals can be reached, ii) only orthonormal sets can be reached and iii) the parameters are independent variables. 

In the case of quantum field theory the section determines the Hilbert space of states under a certain gauge. This choice of gauge then determines the unitary representation of the Hilbert space. We may then replace the section with the fermion field /, which acts on the Fock space of states. It is then apparent that a gauge transformation A t > A t + 84 is associated with a unitary transform of the fermion field v / > v / I 8 /. The unitary transformation of the fermion... 

This demonstrates the association between the unitary transformation of the fermion field and the gauge theory. 

In standard quantum field theory, particles are identified as (positive frequency) solutions ijj of the Dirac equation (p — m) fj = 0, with p = y p, m is the rest mass and p the four-momentum operator, and antiparticles (the CP conjugates, where P is parity or spatial inversion) as positive energy (and frequency) solutions of the adjoint equation (p + m) fi = 0. This requires Cq to be linear e u must be transformed into itself. Indeed, the Dirac equation and its adjoint are unitarily equivalent, being linked by a unitary transformation (a sign reversal) of the y matrices. Hence Cq is unitary. 

As an extension of Noether s theorem to quantum mechanics, the hypervirial theorem [101] derives conservation laws from invariant transformations of the theory. Consider a unitary transformation of the Schrodinger equation, U(H — F)T = U(H — = 0, and assume the variational Hilbert space closed under a... 

Next, we consider the spin-orbit coupling, hi WZ structure, one may apply a unitary transformation, which diagonalises at the T point, to the k.p Hamiltonian and then use a perturbation theory for the states close enough to the T point, as described by Bir and Pikus [3]. This leads to the following closed expressions for the hole masses ... 

The first reason that led Latora and Baranger to evaluate the time evolution of the Gibbs entropy by means of a bunch of trajectories moving in a phase space divided into many small cells is the following In the Hamiltonian case the density equation must obey the Liouville theorem, namely it is a unitary transformation, which maintains the Gibbs entropy constant. However, this difficulty can be bypassed without abandoning the density picture. In line with the advocates of decoherence theory, we modify the density equation in such a way as to mimic the influence of external, extremely weak fluctuations [141]. It has to be pointed out that from this point of view, there is no essential difference with the case where these fluctuations correspond to a modified form of quantum mechanics [115]. 

The key of any CPT procedure is actually the choice, at each order s of the theory, of the terms of to be kept in and of those to be put in R, so that they are canceled by the unitary transformation at order s. The simplest perturbative Hamiltonian is obtained when only the terms, which are diagonal with respect to the stretch degrees of freedom, are kept in while aU the other ones are assigned to R. In other words, all the terms of such that m 7 n are canceled. When performing s unitary transformations with this criterion for the definition of R and then neglecting the terms such that i > s, one is left with a Hamiltonian of the form... 

---