Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Unexpected phases

While the morphology of AB-type block copolymers is limited to a relatively small number of possibilities, the morphology of ABC triblock copolymers is considerably richer and complex (Bates and Fredrickson, 1999). New, exotic, and often unexpected phases are continually being discovered by ex-perimentahsts (Breiner et al., 1998). There is a need for theoretical methodology that is capable of predicting, a priori, the possible new morphologies in these more complex block copolymers. We describe one such method in this article. [Pg.438]

As discussed for DSC earlier, disadvantages of microcalorimetry include its chemical non-specificity and also a possibility that unpredictable physical changes might lead to non-Arrhenius behaviour. Such changes include unexpected phase transformations, water transfer between excipients and drugs, improperly defined rate constants, and parallel reactions of the same order but with different activation energies. [Pg.161]

As an example for complicated fluid phase behavior in multi-component systems, in the group of Maurer [1,2,3] fluid four-phase behavior liquid-liquid-liquid-gas in ternary and quaternary aqueous systems is examined Thus, already for ternary systems complications can occur. Also Patton et al. [4] encountered unexpected phase behavior in a ternary system. For the system CO2 + 1-decanol + tetradecane they found a so-called two-phase hole ig enclosed in the three-phase surface ttg. [Pg.70]

The unexpected phase behavior found by Patton et al. [4] in 1993 encouraged us to carry out a systematic investigation on ternary CO2 systems in general. [Pg.79]

R.J. Bakker, M. Baumgartner, Unexpected phase assemblages in inclusions with ternary H20-salt fluids at low temperatures. Central European J. Geosci. 4(2), 225-237 (2012)... [Pg.666]

The traditional design method normally makes use of overall values even when resistance to transfer lies predominantly in the liquid phase. For example, the COg-NaOH system most commonly used for comparing the Kg< values of various tower packings is a liqiiid-phase-controlled system. When the liqiiid phase is controlling, extrapolation to different concentration ranges or operating conditions is not recommended since changes in the reaction mechanism can cause /cl to vary unexpectedly and the overall values do not explicitly show such effects. [Pg.1364]

In this phase of the toller selection process, we assume the long list became a short list and now one or more candidate tollers from the short list will be given an opportunity to prepare a commercial bid. This by no means indicates the short listed tollers are perfect. There may be deficiencies that need to be corrected in concert with the client. With proper effort, one will be successful and be engaged for the toll. Sometimes it is appropriate to decide on a backup toller, as complications can develop that prevent the primary candidate from executing the project as originally planned, due to an incident in their plant, departure of key personnel, or unexpected production demands on the toller. [Pg.39]

Colloidal crystals . At the end of Section 2.1.4, there is a brief account of regular, crystal-like structures formed spontaneously by two differently sized populations of hard (polymeric) spheres, typically near 0.5 nm in diameter, depositing out of a colloidal solution. Binary superlattices of composition AB2 and ABn are found. Experiment has allowed phase diagrams to be constructed, showing the crystal structures formed for a fixed radius ratio of the two populations but for variable volume fractions in solution of the two populations, and a computer simulation (Eldridge et al. 1995) has been used to examine how nearly theory and experiment match up. The agreement is not bad, but there are some unexpected differences from which lessons were learned. [Pg.475]

Concentrations of moderator at or above that which causes the surface of a stationary phase to be completely covered can only govern the interactions that take place in the mobile phase. It follows that retention can be modified by using different mixtures of solvents as the mobile phase, or in GC by using mixed stationary phases. The theory behind solute retention by mixed stationary phases was first examined by Purnell and, at the time, his discoveries were met with considerable criticism and disbelief. Purnell et al. [5], Laub and Purnell [6] and Laub [7], examined the effect of mixed phases on solute retention and concluded that, for a wide range of binary mixtures, the corrected retention volume of a solute was linearly related to the volume fraction of either one of the two phases. This was quite an unexpected relationship, as at that time it was tentatively (although not rationally) assumed that the retention volume would be some form of the exponent of the stationary phase composition. It was also found that certain mixtures did not obey this rule and these will be discussed later. In terms of an expression for solute retention, the results of Purnell and his co-workers can be given as follows,... [Pg.106]

This is an oversimplified treatment of the concentration effect that can occur on a thin layer plate when using mixed solvents. Nevertheless, despite the complex nature of the surface that is considered, the treatment is sufficiently representative to disclose that a concentration effect does, indeed, take place. The concentration effect arises from the frontal analysis of the mobile phase which not only provides unique and complex modes of solute interaction and, thus, enhanced selectivity, but also causes the solutes to be concentrated as they pass along the TLC plate. This concentration process will oppose the dilution that results from band dispersion and thus, provides greater sensitivity to the spots close to the solvent front. This concealed concentration process, often not recognized, is another property of TLC development that helps make it so practical and generally useful and often provides unexpected sensitivities. [Pg.446]

The fact that all ligands failed to transfer Fe " ion from the aqueous into the organic phase was not unexpected, since this ion prefers to bind with picric acid more than the other ligands. This property is typical only for the Fe " ion [54]. Yet, our previous observations [49] indicated that, when FelNO.ala was used instead of metal picrate, it was possible to efficiently extract Fe " into the organic phase by utilizing ligands 1, 3, and 4. [Pg.348]

Mukherjee studied the gas phase equilibria and the kinetics of the possible chemical reactions in the pack-chromising of iron by the iodide process. One conclusion was that iodine-etching of the iron preceded chromis-ing also, not unexpectedly, the initial rate of chromising was controlled by transport of chromium iodide. Neiri and Vandenbulcke calculated, for the Al-Ni-Cr-Fe system, the partial pressures of chlorides and mixed chlorides in equilibrium with various alloys and phases, and so developed for pack aluminising a model of gaseous transport, solid-state transport, and equilibria at interfaces. [Pg.414]

It is not unexpected that the choice of the type of HPLC column, the temperature at which it is maintained and the choice of buffer added to the mobile phase are likely to have an effect on the separation obtained, even for a simple mixture as in this case. [Pg.204]

We postulate that the attack on both sides is accelerated by positive SOI (89a), but an unfavorable orbital interaction along the syn attack trajectory (89b) cancels the acceleration at the syn face [151] as the diene approaches the anhydride moiety (preferentially in endo fashion), unfavorable out-of-phase interaction (SOI) of the n lobes at Cj and of the diene with the tt lobes of the aromatic moiety of the dienophile occurs (89). The unexpected anti-selectivity stems from nnfavorable SOI on the syn side. [Pg.165]


See other pages where Unexpected phases is mentioned: [Pg.225]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.859]    [Pg.2458]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.767]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.158]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.56 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info