Two-slit experiment

A more sophisticated version of the Tannor-Rice scheme exploits both amplitude and phase control by pump-dump pulse separation. In this case the second pulse of the sequence, whose phase is locked to that of the first one, creates amplitude in the excited electronic state that is in superposition with the initial, propagated amplitude. The intramolecular superposition of amplitudes is subject to interference whether the interference is constructive or destructive, giving rise to larger or smaller excited-state population for a given delay between pulses, depends on the optical phase difference between the two pulses and on the detailed nature of the evolution of the initial amplitude. Just as for the Brumer-Shapiro scheme, the situation described is analogous to a two-slit experiment. This more sophisticated Tannor-Rice method has been used by Scherer et al. [18] to control the population of a level of I2. The success of this experiment confirms that it is possible to control population flow with interference that is local in time. 

However, since one electron or proton has two possible spin states, N electrons or protons have 2N possible states (just like the coin toss case). Molecules can be configured to be simultaneously in many different quantum states, just as the electron in the two-slit experiment seems to pass through both slits simultaneously. In principle, this property can be used someday to make massively parallel computers, and such computers with five or six bits have been made in the laboratory (using NMR). As of this writing, nobody knows whether or not it will ever be possible to build a quantum computer which is big enough to do a computation faster than a conventional machine, although it is clear that NMR will not work for this application. 

The interference of light waves can be easily demonstrated using a two-slit experiment (Figure 7.15). Monochromatic (sin-... 

Figure 7.15 Two slit experiment demonstrating the interference of monochromatic light. Concentric curves (cylinders) represent locations of maximum intensity of light waves propagating from the slit sources. Dimensions have been accentuated for clarity generally the slits are 0.1 mm wide and 1 mm apart, the distance from the source slit to the double slit screen is 0.6 m and from the double slit to the screen, 3 m [16). As the double slits are brought closer together, more interference fringes will appear on the screen.

For the two-slit experiment, according to standard QM, strict completion of Eq. (7) would make impossible to determine which hole the electron or photon passes through without, at the same time, disturbing the electrons or photons enough to destroy the interference pattern. This is a puzzling situation within the particle model. Somewhere, there is a missing link (see below). 

Using the example of the two-slit experiment, differences between the present approach and the standard ones can be sensed. 

The vacuum interface is the source of all quantum effects. Interaction with the interface causes particles to make excursions into time and bounce back with time-reversal and randomly perturbed space coordinates. Different from classical particles, quantum objects can suffer displacement in space without time advance. They can appear to be in more than one place at the same time, as in a two-slit experiment. 

K = I, II. The situation is quite analogous to the usual discussion25 of the two slit experiment , and just as there, it is not proper to say that the n, - n2 transition takes place via trajectory I or trajectory II, for logic would then demand that the probabilities add rather there is a probability amplitude for the trajectory being I or II, and these amplitudes add.25... 

Fraunhofer was also the inventor of diffraction grating, a series of parallel wires separated by variable distances as small as 0.005 cm, which acted like an enhanced version of Young s two-slit experiment and could also be used as a replacement for the prism. Passing light through the spaces between the wires forms an interference pattern beyond the grating, and the direction of constructive interference is different for each wavelength. 

In a two-slit experiment an electron wave passes through both slits to recombine, with interference, but without rupture. The interference pattern disappears on closure of one slit or when the slits are too far apart, compared to the de Broglie wavelength. It now behaves exactly hke a classical particle, when forced through a single slit (Holland, 1993). 

When using an interferometer one is measuring coherence functions (Haniff 2007). In this section the focus is on the spatial coherence function, which is the case associated with measuring the electric field from a source at two locations but at the same time. This is equivalent to the Young s two slit experiment. 

Stellar Interferometry is based on the Young s two slit experiment, where incoming light from a source falls on two apertures (or telescopes) which then are made to interfere onto a screen. The measured quantity is the complex visibility V( , v). By selecting the position of the telescopes the Mv-map is sampled. The brightness distribution on the plane of the source is recovered by Fourier transforming the complex visibility. The aperture separation, or baseline, defines the angular resolution of the interferometer. 

Modern-day version of the double-slit experiment using a beam of electrons. Even when the electrons are fired one at a time through the screen with the slits, an interference pattern develops on the optical screen. [Reproduced from http //commons.wikimedia.org /wiki/File Two-Slit Experiment Electrons.svg (accessed December 1, 2013).]... 

Figure 1.4 Two-slit experiment demonstrating the interference phenomenon. The pattern on the screen consists of alternating bright and dark bands.

Figure 7.1 Experiments using scattering methods rely on interference between wave-like radiation, here illustrated schematically in Young s two-slit experiment.

---