Turbulent flow eddy viscosity

Closure Models Many closure models have been proposed. A few of the more important ones are introduced here. Many employ the Boussinesq approximation, simphfied here for incompressible flow, which treats the Reynolds stresses as analogous to viscous stresses, introducing a scalar quantity called the turbulent or eddy viscosity... 

Here, is referred to as turbulent or eddy viscosity, which, in contrast to molecular viscosity, is not a fluid property but depends on the local state of flow or turbulence. It is assumed to be a scalar and may vary significantly within the flow domain, k is the turbulent kinetic energy (normal turbulent stresses) and can be expressed as... 

Within the equilibrium range (also referred to as the inertia subrange) in turbulent flow, eddy size is related to the kinematic viscosity, and local energy dissipation by the Kohnogoroff hypothesis is given in... 

As may be expected, turbulent flow (9,11) is more efficient for droplet formation in low viscosity Hquids. With the average amount of energy dissipated per unit time and volume equal to Z and mass density equal to p, the larger eddies are characterized by a velocity gradient equal to... 

Turbulent flow, by means of the chaotic eddy motion associated with velocity fluctuation, is conducive to rapid mixing and, therefore, is the preferred flow regime for mixing. Laminar mixing is carried out when high viscosity makes turbulent flow impractical. 

The universal turbulent velocity profile near the pipe wall presented in the preceding subsection Tncompressible Flow in Pipes and Channels may be developed using the Prandtl mixing length approximation for the eddy viscosity,... 

The Prandtl mixing length concept is useful for shear flows parallel to walls, but is inadequate for more general three-dimensional flows. A more complicated semiempirical model commonly used in numerical computations, and found in most commercial software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD see the following subsection), is the A — model described by Launder and Spaulding (Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence, Academic, London, 1972). In this model the eddy viscosity is assumed proportional to the ratio /cVe. 

More advanced models, for example the algebraic stress model (ASM) and the Reynolds stress model (RSM), are not based on the eddy-viscosity concept and can thus account for anisotropic turbulence thereby giving still better predictions of flows. In addition to the transport equations, however, the algebraic equations for the Reynolds stress tensor also have to be solved. These models are therefore computationally far more complex than simple closure models (Kuipers and van Swaaij, 1997). 

Fine suspensions are reasonably homogeneous and segregation of solid and liquid phases does not occur to any significant extent during flow. The settling velocities of the particles are low in comparison with the liquid velocity and the turbulent eddies within the fluid are responsible for the suspension of the particles. In practice, turbulent flow will always be used, except when the liquid has a very high viscosity or exhibits non-Newtonian characteristics. The particles may be individually dispersed in the liquid or they may be present as floes. 

Flow of the liquid past the electrode is found in electrochemical cells where a liquid electrolyte is agitated with a stirrer or by pumping. The character of liquid flow near a solid wall depends on the flow velocity v, on the characteristic length L of the solid, and on the kinematic viscosity (which is the ratio of the usual rheological viscosity q and the liquid s density p). A convenient criterion is the dimensionless parameter Re = vLN, called the Reynolds number. The flow is laminar when this number is smaller than some critical value (which is about 10 for rough surfaces and about 10 for smooth surfaces) in this case the liquid moves in the form of layers parallel to the surface. At high Reynolds numbers (high flow velocities) the motion becomes turbulent and eddies develop at random in the flow. We shall only be concerned with laminar flow of the liquid. 

The (isotropic) eddy viscosity concept and the use of a k i model are known to be inappropriate in rotating and/or strongly 3-D flows (see, e.g., Wilcox, 1993). This issue will be addressed in more detail in Section IV. Some researchers prefer different models for the eddy viscosity, such as the k o> model (where o> denotes vorticity) that performs better in regions closer to walls. For this latter reason, the k-e model and the k-co model are often blended into the so-called Shear-Stress-Transport (SST) model (Menter, 1994) with the view of using these two models in those regions of the flow domain where they perform best. In spite of these objections, however, RANS simulations mostly exploit the eddy viscosity concept rather than the more delicate and time-consuming RSM turbulence model. They deliver simulation results of in many cases reasonable or sufficient accuracy in a cost-effective way. 

Note that the Eqs. (1), (2), and (8) are really and essentially different due to the absence or presence of different turbulent transport terms. Only by incorporating dedicated formulations for the SGS eddy viscosity can one attain that LES yield the same flow field as DNS. RANS-based simulations with their turbulent viscosity coefficient, however, essentially deliver steady flow fields and as such are never capable of delivering the same velocity fields as the inherently transient LES or DNS, irrespectively of the refinement of the computational grid ... 

It is the large scale eddies that are responsible for the very rapid transport of momentum, energy and mass across the whole flow field in turbulent flow, while the smallest eddies and their destruction by viscosity are responsible for the uniformity of properties on the fine scale. Although it is the fluctuations in the flow that promote these high transfer rates, it is... 

Estimate the value of the eddy kinematic viscosity s as a function of position for turbulent flow of water in a smooth pipe of internal diameter 100 mm. The centre-line velocity is 6.1 m/s and the pressure drop over a... 

Calculation of eddy kinematic viscosity for turbulent flow 62... 

Durbin, P. A., N. N. Mansour, and Z. Yang (1994). Eddy viscosity transport model for turbulent flow. Physics of Fluids 6, 1007-1015. 

A variety of statistical models are available for predictions of multiphase turbulent flows [85]. A large number of the application oriented investigations are based on the Eulerian description utilizing turbulence closures for both the dispersed and the carrier phases. The closure schemes for the carrier phase are mostly limited to Boussinesq type approximations in conjunction with modified forms of the conventional k-e model [87]. The models for the dispersed phase are typically via the Hinze-Tchen algebraic relation [88] which relates the eddy viscosity of the dispersed phase to that of the carrier phase. While the simplicity of this model has promoted its use, its nonuniversality has been widely recognized [88]. 

Because the quantitative analysis of transport processes in terms of the microscopic description of turbulence is difficult, Kdrmdn suggested (K2) the use of a macroscopic quantity called eddy viscosity to describe the momentum transport in turbulent flow. This quantity, which is dimensionally and physically analogous to kinematic viscosity in the laminar motion of a Newtonian fluid, is defined by... 

The work of Laufer (L3) indicates that eddy viscosity is not isotropic in shear flow. For this reason it is unlikely that eddy conductivity is isotropic in such flows. Therefore, uncertainties in the application of eddy conductivities must arise when it is assumed that this transport coefficient is isotropic. Until additional experimental information is available, it appears reasonable to consider eddy conductivity as isotropic except in circumstances when the vectorial nature (J4, R2) of the eddy viscosity may be estimated. Such an approximation appears acceptable since the measurements available described the conductivity normal to the axis of flow, which is the direction in which most detail is required in the prediction of temperature distribution in turbulently flowing streams. Throughout the remainder of this discussion all eddy properties will be treated as isotropic. Such a simplification is open to uncertainty, and further experimentation will be required in order to determine the error introduced by neglect of the vectorial characteristics of these macroscopic transport quantities. 

Axial dispersion. An axial (longitudinal) dispersion coefficient may be defined by analogy with Boussinesq s concept of eddy viscosity ". Thus both molecular diffusion and eddy diffusion due to local turbulence contribute to the overall dispersion coefficient or effective diffusivity in the direction of flow for the bed of solid. The moles of fluid per unit area and unit time an element of length 8z entering by longitudinal diffusion will be - D L (dY/dz)t, where D L is now the dispersion coefficient in the axial direction and has units ML T- (since the concentration gradient has units NM L ). The amount leaving the element will be -D l (dY/dz)2 + S2. The material balance equation will therefore be ... 

---