True rate of return

Equation (9-54) may be solved for i either graphically or by an iterative trial-and-error procedure. The value of i given by Eq. (9-54) is known as the discounted-cash-flow rate of return (DCFRR). It is also known as the profitability index, true rate of return, investor s rate of return, and interest rate of return. 

The true rates of return L can be calculated from Eq. (9-116) to be 20, 9.09, 0, and —7.69 percent respec tively for generaf inflation rates of 0, 10, 20, and 30 percent. Thus, although the time required for a projec t with a payback period of 4 years to reach a nominal (DCFRR) of 20 percent is reduced from almost 9 years under conditions of no inflation to less than 3V2years for 30 percent inflation, the true rate of return that prevails for the latter condition is —7.69 percent, implying that the project loses money in real terms. 

The discounted cash flow rate of return is known by other terms, for example, the profitability index, the true rate of return, the investor s rate of return, and the internal rate of return. It is defined as the discount rate, i, which makes the NPV of a project equal to zero. This can be expressed mathematically by... 

Other similar methods or names are Profitability Index, Interest Rate of Return, True Rate of Return, Investor s Rate of Return... 

AbdICtc is arbitrarily assessed. Its value will affect the fractional rate of return considerably and may lead to erroneous conclusions when making comparisons between different companies. This is particularly true when making international comparisons. 

Discounted-cash-flow rate of return (DCFRR) has the advantage of being unique and readily understood. However, when used alone, it gives no indication of the scale of the operation. The (NPV) indicates the monetary return, but unlike that of the (DCFRR) its value depends on the base year chosen for the calculation. Additional information is needed before its significance can be appreciated. However, when a company is considering investment in a portfoho of projects, individual (NPV)s have the advantage of being additive. This is not true of (DCFRR)s. 

In this equation, (DCFRR) can be viewed as the nominal discounted-cash-flow rate of return uncorrected for inflation and can be thought of as the true or real discounted-cash-flow rate of return. 

Instead of using Eq. (9-113), it is unfortunately common practice to try to obtain the true or effective rate of return by calculating the nominal (DCFRR), based on actual net annual cash flows uncorrected for inflation, and then subtracting the inflation rate from it as if... 

It is also possible to combine (MSF) considerations with evaluation of the true discounted-cash-flow rate of return (DCFRR) by using Eq. (9-62). The relationship of Eq. (9-59) is independent of inflation if all money values are based on those prevailing in the startup year. For this case, Fig. 9-34 shows the true (DCFRR) reached in a given time, expressed as the number of elapsed payback periods for various values of the payback period. 

Expenditure on corrosion prevention is an investment and appropriate accountancy techniques should be used to assess the true cost of any scheme. The main methods used to appraise investment projects are payback, annual rate of return and discounted cash flow (DCF). The last mentioned is the most appropriate technique since it is based on the principle that money has a time value. This means that a given sum of money available now is worth more than an equivalent sum at some future data, the difference in value depending on the rate of interest earned (discount rate) and the time interval. A full description of DCF is beyond the scope of this section, but this method of accounting can make a periodic maintenance scheme more attractive than if the time value of money were not considered. The concept is illustrated in general terms by considering a sum of money P invested at an... 

Some writers claim that an advantage of the Rate of Return method is that no interest rate needs to be chosen. It has already been illustrated that this is not true. The difference in the two measures is when, not whether, a reasonable interest rate is chosen. With the Rate of Return method it does not need to be chosen until after the rate of return is obtained. If it is too high and two processes are both found acceptable, then the net present value must be calculated to determine which is best. In doing this the interest rates for proceeds and outlays may be different. 

There is good reason not to use AWP in country U. Suppose that drug firms in some country are able to earn above-normal rates of return on new products, year in and year out. If monopoly rents are built into AWP there, they should surely be backed out if the analysis is to be done from a true societal perspective. The argument in Gold et al. (1996) that prices must be at least high enough for firms to break even does not preclude the possibility that most ventures do much better than just break even. 

Based on their pharmacokinetic profile alone, the safest statins in chronic compensated liver disease and a history of decompensation are prohahly pravastatin and rosnvastatin. However, clinical experience with rosnvastatin in liver disease is lacking, and so it cannot be recommended. In addition, the true rate of post-marketing adverse drug reactions is not yet clear. Pravastatin is therefore the drug of choice in these patients, where treatment is deemed necessary. It should, however, be avoided in acute episodes until liver function or transaminases stabilise/return to normal. 

The economic analysis of investment alternatives generally entails the estimation of cash flows and the application of some measure of worth, such as net present value or the internal rate of return, in order to make a decision. The estimation of these cash flows requires the estimation of prices, whether they be the price of goods sold to forecast revenues or the estimation of wages to forecast labor costs. Over time these prices change. An increase in price is known as inflation, while a decrease in price is termed deflation. These concepts and their measurement are explained in this chapter. Cash flow analysis methods are revisited under the assumption of price changes, as their effects can be significant (Fleischer 1994). This is especially true when one considers after-tax cash flow analysis, as the effects of depreciation and taxes represent one of the most important aspects of investment analysis (Park and Sharp-Bette 1990). 

Equation (9-113) shows that Eq. (9-114) is only approximately true and should be used, if at all, solely for low interest rates. Let us consider the case of a nominal (DCFRR) of 5 percent and an inflation rate of 3 percent. Equation (9-14) yields an approximate effective return rate of 2 percent, compared with the real effective rate of 1.94 percent given by Eq. (9-113) i.e., there is an error of 3.1 percent. Now let us consider the case of a nominal (DCFRR) of 2.5 percent and an inflation rate of 23 percent. Equation (9-114) yields an approximate effective return rate of 2 percent, compared with 1.63 percent from Eq. (9-113) in this case, the error that results is 22.7 percent. 

To see what is going on physically, it is easier to return to our first condition. At low stress, if we make a little neck, the material in the neck will work-harden and will be able to carry the extra stress it has to stand because of its smaller area load will therefore be continuous, and the material will be stable. At high stress, the rate of workhardening is less as the true stress-true strain curve shows i.e. the slope of the o/e curve is less. Eventually, we reach a point at which, when we make a neck, the workhardening is only just enough to stand the extra stress. This is the point of necking, with... 

However, often the minimum in Si or Ti which is reached at first is shallow and thermal energy will allow escape into other areas on the Si or Ti surface before return to So occurs (Fig. 3, path e). This is particularly true in the Ti state which has longer lifetimes due to the spin-forbidden nature of both its radiative and non-radiative modes of return to So-The rate of the escape should depend on temperature and is determined in the simplest case by the height and shape of the wall around the minimum, similarly as in ground state reactions (concepts such as activation energy and entropy should be applicable). In cases of intermediate complexity, non-unity transmission coefficients may become important, as discussed above. Finally, in unfavorable cases, vibronic coupling between two or more states has to be considered at all times and simple concepts familiar from ground-state chemistry are not applicable. Pres-... 

Both the time of analysis and experimental design may affect the results. An explanation for the increase in adenylates under the conditions of our experiment is still needed. Since both ATP alone and total adenylate concentrations have increased, it does not appear that a shift in phosphorylation can account for the increases. The decrease in photosynthesis and increase in adenylates occur during the same time period and both factors return to normal after 21 hr. From previous research we know that the photosynthetic levels of ozonated pinto bean foliage decrease immediately after ozone exposure even when symptoms do not develop ( ). This does not hold true for the adenylate or respiration responses. Therefore, it appears that the ozone-initiated increase in adenylates is not correlated directly to the photosynthetic response. The increase in respiration persists when adenylate content and photosynthetic rates have returned to normal. Impaired mitochondrial function appears to be a secondary response more closely related to symptom development. 

---