Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Troubleshooting for antimicrobial finishes

A general problem of antimicrobial finishes is their selective effect. Some are [Pg.172]

Procedure Similar to AATCC TM 147 (Table 15.1) and ISO 20645. Agar may contain a nutrient or be nutrient-free to test if samples are a viable carbon source. Samples are buried up to 28 days, longer for coatings and plastics. Samples are sprayed with a mixed spore suspension (fungi) and held over water. Organism must obtain its carbon from material under test. Inoculated samples are left in contact for 0-24 hour. Organisms are then extracted and counted. [Pg.173]

Evaluation Visual, growth of contact and halo Loss of tensile strength or weight. Control samples must rot in about 7 days. Visual assessment (including a microscope) Number of colony forming units (cfu) [Pg.173]

Advantages Quick test for bacteria and fungi, variability of test conditions The most severe test Especially suitable for testing fungi or yeasts Relatively quick, distinguishes between biocide and biostat [Pg.173]

Disadvantages Size of halo indicates high diffusion or efficiency of the biocide Long term and expensive Long time of incubation Only for bacteria. Time consuming and expensive [Pg.173]


See other pages where Troubleshooting for antimicrobial finishes is mentioned: [Pg.172]   


SEARCH



Troubleshooting

© 2024 chempedia.info