Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transition state drawing structure

Does your transition state drawing look more like a sing Lewis structure or a resonance hybrid If the latter, whi resonance contributors must you combine to generate a of the features of this hybrid ... [Pg.62]

Examine spin densities for the two transition states. Draw a Lewis structure (or sequence of Lewis structures) for each which properly conveys the location(s) of the unpaired electron. [Pg.238]

How can we draw the structure of the unstable transition state The structure of the transition state is somewhere in between the structures of the starting material and product. Any bond that is partially broken or formed is drawn with a dashed line. Any atom that gains or loses a charge contains a partial charge in the transition state. Transition states are drawn in brackets, with a superscript double dagger ( ). [Pg.211]

For each reaction, plot energy (vertical axis) vs. the number of the structure in the overall sequence (horizontal axis). Do reactions that share the same mechanistic label also share similar reaction energy diagrams How many barriers separate the reactants and products in an Sn2 reaction In an SnI reaction Based on your observations, draw a step-by-step mechanism for each reaction using curved arrows () to show electron movements. The drawing for each step should show the reactants and products for that step and curved arrows needed for that step only. Do not draw transition states, and do not combine arrows for different steps. [Pg.63]

Use geometries, electrostatic potential maps and spin densities to help you draw Lewis structures for butanal radical cation, the transition state and product. Where is the positive charge and the unpaired electron in each Is the positive charge (the unpaired electron) more or less delocalized in the transition state than in the reactant In the product ... [Pg.270]

Finally, examine the geometry of the lower-energy transition state. Measure all CC bond lengths. Draw a Lewis structure representing partial bonds in terms of... [Pg.273]

Step through the sequence of stmctures depicting Cope rearrangement of 1,5-hexadiene. Plot energy (vertical axis) vs. the length of either the carbon-carbon bond being formed or that being broken (horizontal axis). Locate the transition state. Measure all CC bond distances at the transition state, and draw a structural formula for it... [Pg.278]

Compare the geometry of maleic anhydride+propene, the ene transition state, to those of the reactants (maleic anhydride and propene). Is bond making and breaking occurring at once In particular, is the migrating hydrogen partially bonded to two carbons (rather than being fully bonded to one carbon ) Draw a Lewis structure to represent the transition state. Use dashed lines (.. and to represent partial bonds. [Pg.279]

Problem 6.18 What about the second step in the electrophilic addition of HCl to an alkene—the reaction of chloride ion with the carbocation intermediate Is this step exergonic or endergontc Does the transition state for this second step resemble the reactant (carbocation) or product (alkyl chloride) Make a rough drawing of what the transition-state structure might look like. [Pg.199]

Martin observed an extremely facile thermal decomposition of bisperester 53, which gave 54 (Scheme 7).74 The decomposition proceeds via a transition state 55, with the simultaneous participation of the cr (0 O)—np(S)—a (0-0) type.74 The transition state can be draw by the 5c 6e interaction. Alvalez discussed the structure and the stability of Br42, together with neutral Br4.lla The dianion could be analyzed by the 4c 6e model, if the four atoms align linearly with suitable distances. Farnham investigated the fluorine-bridged linear C-I- -F- I C interaction based on 5c-6e.llb... [Pg.658]

FIGURE 29. Reactant cluster, transition state, TS, and the IRC path study (right drawing) of the epoxidation of allyl alcohol with peroxyformic acid showing the movement of atoms from the transition state (dark, PI) toward the products (light, P3) with an intermediate structure, P2. The calculation was done at the MP2/6-31G(d) level. The reaction coordinate is in units of amu bohr, the relative energies are in kcal mol-1 and the distances are in A. Geometric parameters in parentheses are at the MP2/6-3 lG(d,p) (see text) level of theory... [Pg.66]

Fig. 15.2. Perspective drawings of the transition state structures of the [4+2]-cycloadditions ethene + butadiene —> cyclohexene and acetylene + butadiene — 1,4-cyclohexadiene. Fig. 15.2. Perspective drawings of the transition state structures of the [4+2]-cycloadditions ethene + butadiene —> cyclohexene and acetylene + butadiene — 1,4-cyclohexadiene.
Fig. 15.11. Perspective drawing of the structure of the transition state of the [2+2]-cycloaddition ketene + ethene cyclo-butanone. Fig. 15.11. Perspective drawing of the structure of the transition state of the [2+2]-cycloaddition ketene + ethene cyclo-butanone.
The high simple diastereoselectivities seen in Figures 15.29 and 15.30 are due to the same preferred orientation of the ester group in the transition states. The stereostructure of the cycloadduct shows unequivocally that the ester group points underneath the diene plane in each of the transition states of both cycloadditions and not away from that plane. Figure 15.31 exemplifies this situation for two transition states of simple Diels-Alder reactions of 1,3-butadiene A shows a perspective drawing of the transition state of the acrylic acid ester addition, and B provides a side view of the addition of ethene, which will serve as an aid in the following discussion. Both structures were determined by computational chemistry. [Pg.670]

In conclusion, it is apparent that the use of the Br nsted coefficient as a measure of selectivity and hence of transition state structure appears to be based on extensive experimental data. However, the many cases where this use of the Br nsted coefficient is invalid suggest that considerable caution be used in drawing mechanistic conclusions from such data. The limitations on the mechanistic significance of a require further clarification, but the first steps in defining them appear to have been taken. The influence of change in the intrinsic barrier and variable intermolecular interactions in the transition state, both of which will result in a breakdown of the rate-equilibrium relationship, as well as internal return appear to be some of the key parameters which determine the magnitude of the Br nsted coefficient in addition to the degree of proton transfer. [Pg.96]


See other pages where Transition state drawing structure is mentioned: [Pg.347]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.172]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.211 ]




SEARCH



Drawings Structures

Structure states

© 2024 chempedia.info