Transition state, collision theory

The most accepted modern activation theory for the outer electron transfer is that of Rudolph A. Marcus (Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1992) [14], which is different from the transition state theory. His studies on unimolecular reactions and the transition and collision theories committed him to elaborate on the Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) theory in 1952. This theory is an extension of the previous RRK theory proposed by Rice, Ramsperger, and Kassel between 1927 and 1928. Moreover, Hush and Marcus further extended the electron transfer theory of Marcus for inner electron transfers [15-17]. 

Flere, we shall concentrate on basic approaches which lie at the foundations of the most widely used models. Simplified collision theories for bimolecular reactions are frequently used for the interpretation of experimental gas-phase kinetic data. The general transition state theory of elementary reactions fomis the starting point of many more elaborate versions of quasi-equilibrium theories of chemical reaction kinetics [27, M, 37 and 38]. 

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. 

A more general, and for the moment, less detailed description of the progress of chemical reactions, was developed in the transition state theory of kinetics. This approach considers tire reacting molecules at the point of collision to form a complex intermediate molecule before the final products are formed. This molecular species is assumed to be in thermodynamic equilibrium with the reactant species. An equilibrium constant can therefore be described for the activation process, and this, in turn, can be related to a Gibbs energy of activation ... 

The collision theory considers the rate to be governed by the number of energetic collisions between the reactants. The transition state theory considers the reaction rate to be governed by the rate of the decomposition of intermediate. Tlie formation rate of tlie intermediate is assumed to be rapid because it is present in equilibrium concentrations. 

If the transition state theory is applied to the reaction of two hard spheres, the result is identical with that of simple collision theory. - pp Because transition state theory is an equilibrium theory, it can be inferred that collision theory is also an equilibrium theory. 

A more interesting possibility, one that has attracted much attention, is that the activation parameters may be temperature dependent. In Chapter 5 we saw that theoiy predicts that the preexponential factor contains the quantity T", where n = 5 according to collision theory, and n = 1 according to the transition state theory. In view of the uncertainty associated with estimation of the preexponential factor, it is not possible to distinguish between these theories on the basis of the observed temperature dependence, yet we have the possibility of a source of curvature. Nevertheless, the exponential term in the Arrhenius equation dominates the temperature behavior. From Eq. (6-4), we may examine this in terms either of or A//. By analogy with equilibrium thermodynamics, we write... 

Show how collision theory and transition state theory account for the temperature dependence of reactions (Sections... 

The case of m = Q corresponds to classical Arrhenius theory m = 1/2 is derived from the collision theory of bimolecular gas-phase reactions and m = corresponds to activated complex or transition state theory. None of these theories is sufficiently well developed to predict reaction rates from first principles, and it is practically impossible to choose between them based on experimental measurements. The relatively small variation in rate constant due to the pre-exponential temperature dependence T is overwhelmed by the exponential dependence exp(—Tarf/T). For many reactions, a plot of In(fe) versus will be approximately linear, and the slope of this line can be used to calculate E. Plots of rt(k/T" ) versus 7 for the same reactions will also be approximately linear as well, which shows the futility of determining m by this approach. 

Kinetics on the level of individual molecules is often referred to as reaction dynamics. Subtle details are taken into account, such as the effect of the orientation of molecules in a collision that may result in a reaction, and the distribution of energy over a molecule s various degrees of freedom. This is the fundamental level of study needed if we want to link reactivity to quantum mechanics, which is really what rules the game at this fundamental level. This is the domain of molecular beam experiments, laser spectroscopy, ah initio theoretical chemistry and transition state theory. It is at this level that we can learn what determines whether a chemical reaction is feasible. 

To understand how collision theory has been derived, we need to know the velocity distribution of molecules at a given temperature, as it is given by the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. To use transition state theory we need the partition functions that follow from the Boltzmann distribution. Hence, we must devote a section of this chapter to statistical thermodynamics. 

Finally, we will apply transition state theory and collision theory to some elementary surface reactions that are important in catalysis. 

Expression (109) appears to be similar to the Arrhenius expression, but there is an important difference. In the Arrhenius equation the temperature dependence is in the exponential only, whereas in collision theory we find a dependence in the pre-exponential factor. We shall see later that transition state theory predicts even stronger dependences on T. 

A pre-exponential factor and activation energy for each rate constant must be established. All forward rate constants involving alkyne adsorption (ki, k2, and ks) are assumed to have equal pre-exponential factors specified by the collision limit (assuming a sticking coefficient of one). All adsorption steps are assumed to be non-activated. Both desorption constants (k.i and k ) are assumed to have preexponential factors equal to 10 3 sec, as expected from transition-state theory [28]. Both desorption activation energies (26.1 kcal/mol for methyl acetylene and 25.3 kcal/mol for trimethylbenzene) were derived from TPD results [1]. 

P. Pechukas and F. J. McLafferty, On transition state theory and the classical mechanics of collinear collisions, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 1622 (1973). 

Generalized relativstic effective core potentials (GRECP), ab initio calculations, P,T-odd interactions, 253-259 Gene transcription, multiparticle collisions, reactive dynamics, 108-111 Geometric transition state theory, 195-201 Gillespie s algorithm, multiparticle collisions, reactive dynamics, 109-111 Golden Rule approximation, two-pathway... 

The term A in Equation (2.6) is a constant known as the Arrhenius constant and E is the energy of activation derived from collision theory (Atkins, 1978). The enthalpy of activation can be calculated from transition state theory (Jencks, 1969) as... 

Because T -> V energy transfer does not lead to complex formation and complexes are only formed by unoriented collisions, the Cl" + CH3C1 -4 Cl"—CH3C1 association rate constant calculated from the trajectories is less than that given by an ion-molecule capture model. This is shown in Table 8, where the trajectory association rate constant is compared with the predictions of various capture models.9 The microcanonical variational transition state theory (pCVTST) rate constants calculated for PES1, with the transitional modes treated as harmonic oscillators (ho) are nearly the same as the statistical adiabatic channel model (SACM),13 pCVTST,40 and trajectory capture14 rate constants based on the ion-di-pole/ion-induced dipole potential,... 

Although the collision and transition state theories represent two important methods of attacking the theoretical calculation of reaction rates, they are not the only approaches available. Alternative methods include theories based on nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, stochastic theories, and Monte Carlo simulations of chemical dynamics. Consult the texts by Johnson (62), Laidler (60), and Benson (59) and the review by Wayne (63) for a further introduction to the theoretical aspects of reaction kinetics. 

Holroyd (1977) finds that generally the attachment reactions are very fast (fej - 1012-1013 M 1s 1), are relatively insensitive to temperature, and increase with electron mobility. The detachment reactions are sensitive to temperature and the nature of the liquid. Fitted to the Arrhenius equation, these reactions show very large preexponential factors, which allow the endothermic detachment reactions to occur despite high activation energy. Interpreted in terms of the transition state theory and taking the collision frequency as 1013 s 1- these preexponential factors give activation entropies 100 to 200 J/(mole.K), depending on the solute and the solvent. 

These values are quite reasonable for the conversion of a molecule AB into two fragments A and B. One may alternatively, more rigorously, and less restrictively (the reactants need not be approximated by hard spheres) analyze the reactive collisions within the framework of transition state theory,18 leading to the expressions given in equations (4) and (5). 

Transition state theory complements collision theory. When particles collide with enough energy to react, called the activation energy, Ea, the reactants form a short-lived, high energy activated complex, or transition state, before forming the products. The transition state also could revert back to the reactants. 

---