Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transient quenching

Although the products do not allow one to distinguish between intra- and intermolecular processes, they found that the plots of kdecay versus quencher (alcohol) concentration are nonlinear. They have analyzed the data according to the quadratic expression shown in equation 16, where kq is the third-order rate constant corresponding to transient quenching by two molecules of alcohol. [Pg.850]

Stern-Volmer equation may be introduced by the transient component of dynamic quenching. If the quencher molecules are present near the fluorescent molecule at the moment of excitation, the initial quenching before a steady state is achieved, leads to the non-steady state term in the quenching expression. A sphere of transient quenching of volume r, may be defined as... [Pg.281]

The last term represents the non-stationary (transient) quenching, which precedes the stationary (steady-state) one. Thus, the diffusional reactions are essentially non-Markovian. [Pg.116]

Figure 4 Fit to the decay of Poly(VBuPBD) at 350 nm and 25 C assuming transient quenching and excimer reverse dissociation. Figure 4 Fit to the decay of Poly(VBuPBD) at 350 nm and 25 C assuming transient quenching and excimer reverse dissociation.
Similar behaviour is evident in the Poly(VBuPBD) data of Table 1. The presence of more than one excimer emission would also be expected to distort the transient quenching analysis shown in Table III, leading to anomalously high 73 values being obtained. [Pg.183]

Nevertheless, why the transient quenching model is less appropriate for Poly(VPPO) than it is for Poly(VBuPBD) is still unclear but it is perhaps significant that its excimer decay (both direct emission and reverse dissociation) is considerably more intense than Poly(VBuPBD) which would be expected to more clearly expose the inappropriateness of assuming that only one excimer conformation and decay time is present. [Pg.183]

Over the past few years it has often been observed that the photochemical behaviour of adsorbed molecules is distinctly different to that of their gas phase counterparts. Even direct dissociations of molecules physisorbed on insulator substrates were found to have different dynamics to the analagous gas phase reaction, and exhibited a dependence on the coverage. This needs to be understood. For adsorbed molecules a new kind of "dissocation" is possible, namely desorption, Photolytic (non thermal) desorption has been reported from all kinds of substrate. On metal surfaces it is often found that the quantum yield for a direct photodissociation reaction is much lower than in the isolated molecule. This must be accounted for. Finally, the observation which has stimulated a great deal of research in surface photochemistry, photolysis is observable at energies where the gas phase molecules are transparent. It turns out that all of these interrelated effects can be interpreted by a delicate interplay of excitation mechanism and transient quenching. The fine details of course depend on particular adsorbate-substrate systems, which are described in section 4. [Pg.488]

FIGURE 15.73 Effect of surface inclination angle on transition boiling of saturated water. Experiment of transient (quenching) type (from El-Genk and Guo [184], with permission from ASME). [Pg.1058]

Nonradiative reiaxation and quenching processes wiii aiso affect the quantum yieid of fluorescence, ( )p = /cj /(/cj + Rsiative measurements of fluorescence quantum yieid at different quencher concentrations are easiiy made in steady state measurements absoiute measurements (to detemrine /cpjj ) are most easiiy obtained by comparisons of steady state fluorescence intensity with a fluorescence standard. The usefuiness of this situation for transient studies... [Pg.2959]

Table 5. Effect of ground-state CT complexation on fluorescence quenching and the transient yield of MV+- for APh-x (8), QPh-x (12), and their monomer models AM (15) and QM (16) in aqueous solution [76]... Table 5. Effect of ground-state CT complexation on fluorescence quenching and the transient yield of MV+- for APh-x (8), QPh-x (12), and their monomer models AM (15) and QM (16) in aqueous solution [76]...
It has been shown in Chapter 5, the fluorescence quenching of the DPA moiety by MV2 + is very efficient in an alkaline solution [60]. On the other hand, Delaire et al. [124] showed that the quenching in an acidic solution (pH 1.5-3.0) was less effective (kq = 2.5 x 109 M 1 s 1) i.e., it was slower than the diffusion-controlled limit. They interpreted this finding as due to the reduced accessibility of the quencher to the DPA group located in the hydrophobic domain of protonated PMA at acidic pH. An important observation is that, in a basic medium, laser excitation of the PMAvDPA-MV2 + system yielded no transient absorption. This implies that a rapid back ET occurs after very efficient fluorescence quenching. [Pg.90]

Most radicals are transient species. They (e.%. 1-10) decay by self-reaction with rates at or close to the diffusion-controlled limit (Section 1.4). This situation also pertains in conventional radical polymerization. Certain radicals, however, have thermodynamic stability, kinetic stability (persistence) or both that is conferred by appropriate substitution. Some well-known examples of stable radicals are diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitroxides such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-A -oxyl (TEMPO), triphenylniethyl radical (13) and galvinoxyl (14). Some examples of carbon-centered radicals which are persistent but which do not have intrinsic thermodynamic stability are shown in Section 1.4.3.2. These radicals (DPPH, TEMPO, 13, 14) are comparatively stable in isolation as solids or in solution and either do not react or react very slowly with compounds usually thought of as substrates for radical reactions. They may, nonetheless, react with less stable radicals at close to diffusion controlled rates. In polymer synthesis these species find use as inhibitors (to stabilize monomers against polymerization or to quench radical reactions - Section 5,3.1) and as reversible termination agents (in living radical polymerization - Section 9.3). [Pg.14]

For systems such as these, which consist of electron transfer quenching and back electron transfer, it is in general possible to determine the rates both of quenching and of the back reaction. In addition to these aspects of excited state chemistry, one can make another use of such systems. They can be used to synthesize other reactive molecules worthy of study in their own right. The quenching reaction produces new and likely reactive species. They are Ru(bpy)3+ and Ru(bpy)j in the respective cases just shown. One can have a prospective reagent for one of these ions in the solution and thereby develop a lengthy and informative series of kinetic data for the transient. [Pg.266]

Fig. 1. a) UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of riboflavin (RF, 20 pM) and Gum Arabic aqueous solutions at pH 7 (phosphate buffer 100 mM). b) Transient absorption spectra of RF (35 pM) in N2-saturated MeOH-Water (1 1) solution. The insets show the transient decay at 720 nm for the RF species and the Stern-Volmer plot for the quenching of 3RF by GA, eqn 11. [Pg.13]

Figure lb shows the transient absorption spectra of RF (i.e. the difference between the ground singlet and excited triplet states) obtained by laser-flash photolysis using a Nd Yag pulsed laser operating at 355 nm (10 ns pulse width) as excitation source. At short times after the laser pulse, the transient spectrum shows the characteristic absorption of the lowest vibrational triplet state transitions (0 <— 0) and (1 <— 0) at approximately 715 and 660 nm, respectively. In the absence of GA, the initial triplet state decays with a lifetime around 27 ps in deoxygenated solutions by dismutation reaction to form semi oxidized and semi reduced forms with characteristic absorption bands at 360 nm and 500-600 nm and (Melo et al., 1999). However, in the presence of GA, the SRF is efficiently quenched by the gum with a bimolecular rate constant = 1.6x10 M-is-i calculated... [Pg.13]


See other pages where Transient quenching is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.1056]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.1056]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.2959]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.1070]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.290]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.181 , Pg.183 ]




SEARCH



Transient Effects in Quenching

Transient effects, fluorescence quenching

© 2024 chempedia.info