Transfer Coefficient Group

Example 9 Calculation of Mass-Transfer Coefficient Group. 12-15... 

Table 16.4 Alternatfve mass transfer coefficient groupings for gas absorption... 

Bed-to-Surface Heat Transfer. Bed-to-surface heat-transfer coefficients in fluidized beds are high. In a fast-fluidized bed combustor containing mostly Group B limestone particles, the dense bed-to-boiling water heat-transfer coefficient is on the order of 250 W/(m -K). For an FCC catalyst cooler (Group A particles), this heat-transfer coefficient is around 600 W/(600 -K). 

Fundamental models correctly predict that for Group A particles, the conductive heat transfer is much greater than the convective heat transfer. For Group B and D particles, the gas convective heat transfer predominates as the particle surface area decreases. Figure 11 demonstrates how heat transfer varies with pressure and velocity for the different types of particles (23). As superficial velocity increases, there is a sudden jump in the heat-transfer coefficient as gas velocity exceeds and the bed becomes fluidized. 

Fig. 11. Variation of heat-transfer coefficient, where O represents experimental results at 100 kPa , 500 kPa 0, 1000 kPa and , 2000 kPa, of pressure (23) for (a) a 0.061-mm glass—CO2 system (Group A particles) and (b) a 0.475-mm glass—N2 system (Group B and D particles). To convert kPa to psi,...

In the macroscopic heat-transfer term of equation 9, the first group in brackets represents the usual Dittus-Boelter equation for heat-transfer coefficients. The second bracket is the ratio of frictional pressure drop per unit length for two-phase flow to that for Hquid phase alone. The Prandd-number function is an empirical correction term. The final bracket is the ratio of the binary macroscopic heat-transfer coefficient to the heat-transfer coefficient that would be calculated for a pure fluid with properties identical to those of the fluid mixture. This term is built on the postulate that mass transfer does not affect the boiling mechanism itself but does affect the driving force. 

The dimensionless relations are usually indicated in either of two forms, each yielding identical resiilts. The preferred form is that suggested by Colburn ran.s. Am. In.st. Chem. Eng., 29, 174—210 (1933)]. It relates, primarily, three dimensionless groups the Stanton number h/cQ, the Prandtl number c Jk, and the Reynolds number DG/[L. For more accurate correlation of data (at Reynolds number <10,000), two additional dimensionless groups are used ratio of length to diameter L/D and ratio of viscosity at wall (or surface) temperature to viscosity at bulk temperature. Colburn showed that the product of the Stanton number and the two-thirds power of the Prandtl number (and, in addition, power functions of L/D and for Reynolds number <10,000) is approximately equal to half of the Fanning friction fac tor//2. This produc t is called the Colburn j factor. Since the Colburn type of equation relates heat transfer and fluid friction, it has greater utility than other expressions for the heat-transfer coefficient. 

Note that the group on the left side of Eq. (14-182) is dimensionless. When turbulence promoters are used at the inlet-gas seclion, an improvement in gas mass-transfer coefficient for absorption of water vapor by sulfuric acid was obsei ved by Greenewalt [Ind. Eng. Chem., 18, 1291 (1926)]. A falhug off of the rate of mass transfer below that indicated in Eq. (14-182) was obsei ved by Cogan and Cogan (thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1932) when a cauTiiug zone preceded the gas inlet in ammonia absorption (Fig. 14-76). 

Not only is the type of flow related to the impeller Reynolds number, but also such process performance characteristics as mixing time, impeller pumping rate, impeller power consumption, and heat- and mass-transfer coefficients can be correlated with this dimensionless group. 

As can be seen in the table above, the upper two results for heat transfer coefficients hp between particle and gas are about 10% apart. The lower three results for wall heat transfer coefficients, h in packed beds have a somewhat wider range among themselves. The two groups are not very different if errors internal to the groups are considered. Since the heat transfer area of the particles is many times larger than that at the wall, the critical temperature difference will be at the wall. The significance of this will be shown later in the discussion of thermal sensitivity and stability. 

Pavlushenko et al. (P4) in their dimensional analysis considered Ks, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient, to be a function of pc, pc, L, Dr, N, Vs, and g. They determined the following relationship for the dimensionless groupings ... 

In their analysis, however, they neglected the surface tension and the diffusivity. As has already been pointed out, the volumetric mass-transfer coefficient is a function of the interfacial area, which will be strongly affected by the surface tension. The mass-transfer coefficient per unit area will be a function of the diffusivity. The omission of these two important factors, surface tension and diffusivity, even though they were held constant in Pavlu-shenko s work, can result in changes in the values of the exponents in Eq. (48). For example, the omission of the surface tension would eliminate the Weber number, and the omission of the diffusivity eliminates the Schmidt number. Since these numbers include variables that already appear in Eq. (48), the groups in this equation that also contain these same variables could end up with different values for the exponents. 

For the mass-transfer coefficient of a bubble in a group of bubbles, Ruckenstein (R9) assumes that... 

The mean value of the heat transfer coefficient between x = 0 and x = x is equal to twice the point value at x = x. The mean value of the Nusselt group is given by ... 

This equation can be used for calculating the point value of the heat transfer coefficient by substituting for R/pu2 in terms of the Reynolds group Rex using equation 11.39 ... 

Convective heat transfer to fluid inside circular tubes depends on three dimensionless groups the Reynolds number. Re = pdtu/ii, the Prandtl number, Pr = Cpiilk where k is the thermal conductivity, and the length-to-diameter ratio, L/D. These groups can be combined into the Graetz number, Gz = RePr4/L. The most commonly used correlations for the inside heat transfer coefficient are... 

The final dimensionless group to be evaluated is the interfacial heat-transfer number, and therefore the interfacial heat-transfer coefficient and the interfacial area must be determined. The interface is easily described for this regime, and, with a knowledge of the holdup and the tube geometry, the interfacial area can be calculated. The interfacial heat trasfer coefficient is not readily evaluated, since experimental values for U are not available. A conservative estimate for U is found by treating the interface as a stationary wall and calculating U from the relationship... 

For gas-liquid flows in Regime I, the Lockhart and Martinelli analysis described in Section I,B can be used to calculate the pressure drop, phase holdups, hydraulic diameters, and phase Reynolds numbers. Once these quantities are known, the liquid phase may be treated as a single-phase fluid flowing in an open channel, and the liquid-phase wall heat-transfer coefficient and Peclet number may be calculated in the same manner as in Section lI,B,l,a. The gas-phase Reynolds number is always larger than the liquid-phase Reynolds number, and it is probable that the gas phase is well mixed at any axial position therefore, Pei is assumed to be infinite. The dimensionless group M is easily evaluated from the operating conditions and physical properties. 

Botterill et al. (1982) measured the overall heat transfer coefficient as a function of particle size for sand at three different conditions 20°C and ambient pressure, 20°C and 6 atmospheres, and 600°C and ambient pressure. They found that there was a significant increase in h with pressure for Group D particles, but the pressure effect decreased as particle size decreased. At the boundary between Groups A and B, the increase of h with pressure was very small. 

The effect of pressure on the heat transfer coefficient is influenced primarily by hgc (Botterill and Desai, 1972 Xavier etal., 1980). This component of h transfers heat from the interstitial gas flow in the dense phase of the fluidized bed to the heat transfer surface. For Group A and small Group B particles, the interstitial gas flow in the dense phase can be assumed to be approximately equal to Um ed. 6/i s extremely small for... 

Figure 12. The effect of pressure on the overall heat transfer coefficient for group B powders. (Xavier Davidson.)...

---