Time-current correlation function

Figure 2. A pictorial representation of the mode coupling theory scheme for the calculation of the time-dependent friction (f) on a tagged molecule at time t. The rest of the notation is as follows Fs(q,t), self-scattering function F(q,t), intermediate scattering function D, self-diffusion coefficient t]s(t), time-dependnet shear viscosity Cu(q,t), longitudinal current correlation function C q,t), longitudinal current correlation functioa...

We are currently calculating the density profile and surface morphology of PFPE as well as other time-dependent correlation functions to examine the nanoscale transport coefficients for PFPE in a confined geometry. 

As the current correlation function in the time integral has sums over all charge velocities z, effects of cross terms between ionic and molecular motions appear which cannot be identified or separated by electromagnetic measurements. In addition to static solvation and saturation effects on permittivity often considered in biological contexts, Hubbard and Onsager have pointed out "kinetic depolarization" effects which need to be considered. In II, we discuss experimental evidence and implications of the theoretical predictions of such effects. 

The heat-current correlation functions in the nematic phase of the prolate ellipsoids are depicted in Fig. 1. The perpendicular component resembles the heat-current correlation function of a Lennard-Jones fluid. The parallel component, which is the largest one, is different. Immediately after the initial decay there is a negative region, the absolute magnitude of which is rather small though, and it does not contribute very much to the time integral of the heat-current correlation function or the thermal conductivity. 

However, the form of time dependence of the temporary current correlation function appears to be similar to the one obtained in [4]. The difference is in the values of coefficients in these expressions. 

Another approach to calculate thermal conductivity is equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) [125] that uses the Green-Kubo relation derived from linear response theory to extract thermal conductivity from heat current correlation functions. The thermal conductivity X is calculated by integrating the time autocorrelation function of the heat flux vector and is given by... 

TOWARDS THE HYDRODYNAMIC LIMIT STRUCTURE FACTORS AND SOUND DISPERSION. The collective motions of water molecules give rise to many hydrodynamical phenomena observable in the laboratories. They are most conveniently studied in terms of the spatial Fourier ( ) components of the density, particle currents, stress, and energy fluxes. The time correlation function of those Fourier components detail the decay of density, current, and fluctuation on the length scale of the Ijk. 

To conclude this rapid tour of exchange-correlation functionals, we reiterate our comment above that you must spend time understanding the current state of the art of the literature in your area of interest in order to make judgments about what functionals are appropriate for your own work. 

The time-dependent density functional theory [38] for electronic systems is usually implemented at adiabatic local density approximation (ALDA) when density and single-particle potential are supposed to vary slowly both in time and space. Last years, the current-dependent Kohn-Sham functionals with a current density as a basic variable were introduced to treat the collective motion beyond ALDA (see e.g. [13]). These functionals are robust for a time-dependent linear response problem where the ordinary density functionals become strongly nonlocal. The theory is reformulated in terms of a vector potential for exchange and correlations, depending on the induced current density. So, T-odd variables appear in electronic functionals as well. 

Liquids are difficult to model because, on the one hand, many-body interactions are complicated on the other hand, liquids lack the symmetry of crystals which makes many-body systems tractable [364, 376, 94]. No rigorous solutions currently exist for the many-body problem of the liquid state. Yet the molecular properties of liquids are important for example, most chemistry involves solutions of one kind or another. Significant advances have recently been made through the use of spectroscopy (i.e., infrared, Raman, neutron scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance, dielectric relaxation, etc.) and associated time correlation functions of molecular properties. 

These curves show four kinds of structures which are dependent on the current particle concentrations and the oscillation phases of the reaction rate K(t). The moment of time t = 295.0 corresponds to the K(t) maximum whose concentration Na(t) is close to its minimum value. The behaviour of the correlation functions reminds that shown in Fig. 8.5 but the function for the dissimilar particles has now maximum. After a short time interval, at t = 296.0, despite very small change of concentrations and the correlation functions for similar particles, the maximum in the correlation functions for dissimilar particles completely disappeared (K(t) has a minimum). 

The Second ingredient is the expression of the rotational friction in terms of the orientational time correlation functions. We have earlier derived an expression for this which was based on Kirkwood s formula [190]. The full expression should be derived by following an approach similar to that of Sjogren and Sjolander [9]. In addition, the coupling to rotational currents (the vortices) have not been touched upon. 

In this equation g(t) represents the retarded effect of the frictional force, and /(f) is an external force including the random force from the solvent molecules. We see, in contrast to the simple Langevin equation with a constant friction coefficient, that the friction force at a given time t depends on all previous velocities along the trajectory. The friction force is no longer local in time and does not depend on the current velocity alone. The time-dependent friction coefficient is therefore also referred to as a memory kernel . A short-time expansion of the velocity correlation function based on the GLE gives (fcfiT/M)( 1 — (g/M)t2/(2r) + ), where r is the decay time of g(t), and it therefore does not have a discontinuous first derivative at t = 0. The discussion of the properties of the GLE is most easily accomplished by using so-called linear response theory, which forms the theoretical basis for the equation and is a powerful method that allows us to determine non-equilibrium transport coefficients from equilibrium properties of the systems. A discussion of this is, however, beyond the scope of this book. 

Actually, if we focus our attention on Eq. (180) and we consider the case where the correlation function <1> ( ) has the analytical form of Eq. (148), with 2 < p < 3, we reach the conclusion that the conductivity of the system would become infinite in this case, given the fact that the form of Eq. (148) makes non integrable the correlation function . The current /(f) is the time derivative of ( (f)). Thus, time differentiating Eq. (182) and using Eq. (163), we see that j(t) oc f8 1. Hence the generalized Einstein relation of Eq. (182) is not a problem for subdiffusion [76], since the current tends to vanish in the time asymptotic limit. It becomes a problem for superdiffusion, since in this case the current tends to diverge for t > oo. 

Quite generally, it must be stated that some additional effort is required to develop the RDFT towards the same level of sophistication that has been achieved in the nonrelativistic regime. In particular, all exchange-correlation functionals, which are available so far, are functionals of the density alone. An appropriate extension of the nonrelativistic spin density functional formalism on the basis of either the time reversal invariance or the assembly of current density contributions (which are e.g. accessible within the gradient expansion) is one of the tasks still to be undertaken. 

---