Thermodynamic control 1,3-butadiene

Chloro 1 3 butadiene (chloroprene) is the monomer from which the elastomer neoprene IS prepared 2 Chloro 1 3 butadiene is the thermodynamically controlled product formed by addi tion of hydrogen chloride to vinylacetylene (H2C=CHC=CH) The principal product under conditions of kinetic control is the allenic chlonde 4 chloro 1 2 butadiene Suggest a mechanism to account for the formation of each product... 

FIGURE 10.8 Energy diagram showing relationship of kinetic control to thermodynamic control in addition of hydrogen bromide to 1,3-butadiene. 

The electrophilic addition of HBr to 1,3-butadiene is a good example of how a change in experimental conditions can change the product of a reaction. The concept of thermodynamic control versus kinetic control is a useful one that we can sometimes take advantage of in the laboratory. 

The silicon- and sulfur-substituted 9-allyl-9-borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane 2 is similarly prepared via the hydroboration of l-phenylthio-l-trimethylsilyl-l,2-propadiene with 9-borabicy-clo[3.3.1]nonane36. The stereochemistry indicated for the allylborane is most likely the result of thermodynamic control, since this reagent should be unstable with respect to reversible 1,3-borotropic shifts. Products of the reactions of 2 and aldehydes are easily converted inlo 2-phenylthio-l,3-butadienes via acid- or base-catalyzed Peterson eliminations. 

The surprising selectivity in the formation of 4 and 5 is apparently due to thermodynamic control (rapid equilibration via the 1,3-boratropic shift). Structures 4 and 5 are also the most reactive of those that are present at equilibrium, and consequently reactions with aldehydes are very selective. The homoallylic alcohol products are useful intermediates in stereoselective syntheses of trisubstituted butadienes via acid- or base-catalyzed Peterson eliminations. 

Lubineau and coworkers [18] have shown that glyoxal 8 (Ri = R2 = H), glyoxylic acid 8 (Ri = H, R2 = OH), pyruvic acid 8 (Ri = Me, R2 = OH) and pyruvaldehyde 8 (Ri = H, R2 = Me) give Diels-Alder reactions in water with poor reactive dienes, although these dienophiles are, for the most part, in the hydrated form. Scheme 6.6 illustrates the reactions with (E)-1,3-dimethyl-butadiene. The reaction yields are generally good and the ratio of adducts 9 and 10 reflects the thermodynamic control of the reaction. In organic solvent, the reaction is kinetically controlled and the diastereoselectivity is reversed. 

In most cases, more 1,4- than 1,2-addition product is obtained. This may be a consequence of thermodynamic control of products, as against kinetic. In most cases, under the reaction conditions, 15 is converted to a mixture of 15 and 16, which is richer in 16. That is, either isomer gives the same mixture of both, which contains more 16. It was found that at low temperatures, butadiene and HCl gave only 20-25% 1,4 adduct, while at high temperatures, where attainment of equilibrium is more likely, the mixture contained 75% 1,4 product. 1,2 Addition predominated over 1,4 in the reaction between DCl and 1,3-pentadiene, where the intermediate was the symmetrical (except for the D label) HjCHC—CH—CHCH2D. Ion pairs were invoked to explain this result, since a free ion would be expected to be attacked by Cl equally well at both positions, except for the very small isotope effect. 

Both products are commonly obtained, but their relative proportions depend very much on the reaction conditions, e.g. temperature. Thus HC1 with butadiene (63) at -60° yields only 20-25% of the 1,4-adduct (the rest being the 1,2-adduct), while at higher temperatures 75% of the 1,4-adduct was obtained. It is believed that with bromination at lower temperature the control is kinetic cf. p. 42), the 1,2-adduct being formed more rapidly from (64) than is the 1,4-adduct while at higher temperatures, and/or with longer reaction times, equilibrium or thermodynamic control operates, and... 

This preferential formation of 1 1 adduct to form 1,4-hexadiene in a mixture of ethylene and butadiene was further studied by Cramer (4). He concluded that the results appeared to be the consequence of thermodynamic control reactions through a relatively stable 7r-crotyl Rh complex. 

The latter results have been explained on the basis of the following reaction scheme. The 1,2-regioisomers derived from butadiene are obtained through a non-symmetrical iodonium ion intermediate. The subsequent nucleophilic attack on the allylic position gives, under kinetic control, 1,2-derivatives. Nevertheless, when poorer nucleophiles such as benzene or acetonitrile are employed, the conversion of the initially formed iodonium ion into the allylic cation has been suggested to give 1,4-products, under thermodynamic control. However, other alternatives like nucleophilic attack involving allylic participation have not been excluded for the formation of 1,4-derivatives. 

The [(s-trans-diene)ZrCp2] complex (s-trans-1) equilibrates with the [(s-cA-diene)ZrCp2] isomer (x-cA-l) via a reactive high lying (r 2-butadiene) metallocene intermediate (2) [A(s-trans-1 s-cis-l, 283 K) = 22.7 0.3 kcal mol-1]. Syntheses of the (butadiene)zirconocene system carried out under kinetic control invariably led to pure s-trans-1, whereas a ca. 1 1 equilibrium of s-trans-1 and. v-ci.v-l was obtained under conditions of thermodynamic control.5,6 The cr,7i-structured s-cis-l isomer undergoes a dynamic ring-flip automerization process (see Scheme 2) that is rapid on the NMR time scale [AG futom = 12.6 0.5 kcal mol ].5... 

The observation by Fischer et al.18 that the 4,1-addition of dimethylamine to compound la is thermodynamically controlled at 20°C, whereas 2,1-addition/elimination is kinetically controlled at -115°C, turned out to be limited to few cases.20 It has been shown9a 9b 42 112 113 that for most cases, three competing reaction paths must be considered (i) 2,1-addition/elimina-tion with formation of (l-amino)alkynylcarbene complexes (= 2-amino-l-metalla-l-en-3-ynes) 98 (ii) 4,1-addition to give [(2-amino)alkenyl]carbene complexes (= 4-amino-l-metalla-l,3-butadienes) 96 and (iii) 4,1-addition/ elimination to (3-amino)allenylidene complexes (= 4-amino-l-metalla-1,2,3-butatrienes) 99 (Scheme 33, M = Cr, W). The product ratio 96 98 99 depends on the bulk of substituents R and R1, as well as on the reaction conditions. Addition of lithium amides instead of amines leads to predominant formation of allenylidene complexes 99.112 Furthermore, compounds 99 also can be generated by elimination of ethanol from complexes 96 with BF3 or AlEt3114 and A1C13,113 respectively. 

---