Thermal to electrical energy

It is notable that all Generation IV reactors aim to operate at higher coolant temperatures than those of the FWRs, thereby increasing the efficiency of thermal-to-electrical-energy conversion. The main characteristics of some of the reactors mentioned here and others are given in Table G-3. 

Obstacles attend this new solution of the freshwater problem, which magnify those familiar to the chemical engineer in purifying other cheap or worthless raw materials into valuable products by treatment with chemicals or thermal or electrical energy. These obstacles are quite different from the previous main problem of water supply, ie, the factor of happenstance in finding a river or lake nearby or of making a fortunate geological strike. 

The reversible potential for the sulfur dioxide electrolysis is only 0.17 V, less than 10% that of water electrolysis (minimum of 1.23V at 298K and 1 bar) [65,69]. However corrosion problems in the electrolysis step are severe due to the presence of high concentration (about 50%) sulfuric acid. The overall thermal efficiency of the process, considering both thermal and electrical energy input derived from the same heat source, is estimated as 48.8% [116]. However, in terms of economics and process complexity the hybrid cycles face tough competition from advanced water electrolyzers. 

Beginning with a liquid electrochemical system, Dr. Mills has progressed to the use of gaseous media with a reported considerable improvement in overall performance. Apparently, this invention is capable of providing a considerable increase in thermal energy output as compared to electrical energy input. An energy output/input ratio of well over 100 has been reported. 

Fachhochschule Stralsund established in the 1990s a multi-component laboratory for integrated energy systems that included a variety of energy-conversion devices that can convert renewable sources of energy, such as wind and solar energy, to thermal or electrical energy. 

The United States derived about 20 percent of its electricity from nuclear energy in 2002 (EIA, Electric Power Monthly, 2003). The 103 power reactors operating today have a total capacity of nearly 100 gigawatts electric (GWe) and constitute about 13 percent of the installed U.S. electric generation capacity. The current U.S. plants use water as the coolant and neutron moderator (hence called light-water reactors, or LWRs) and rely on the steam Rankine cycle as the thermal-to-electrical power conversion cycle. Other countries use other technologies—notably C02-cooled reactors in the United Kingdom and heavy-water-cooled reactors (HWRs) in Canada and India. 

The necessity to switch from nonrenewable fossil resources to renewable raw materials, such as carbohydrates and triglycerides derived from biomass, was an important conclusion of the Report of the Club of Rome in 1972 [2]. It should be noted, however, that ca. 80% of the global production of oil is converted to thermal or electrical energy. If the world is facing an oil crisis it is, therefore, an energy crisis rather than a raw materials crisis for the chemical industry. Indeed, there are sufficient reserves of fossil feedstocks to satisfy the needs of the chemical industry for a long time to come. 

The expected efficiency for conversion of thermal to electric power is 44% and the bussbar efficiency of the accelerator is 45%. A fraction of the electrical power is fed back to power the accelerator which operates at an energy of 1.6 GeV and produces neutrons in a Pb target. The beam power deposited in the Pb and the thermal power... 

For functional nses the direct conversion of thermal energy to electric energy... 

The electric-to-electric energy efficiency of the battery is very high. Thermal losses must be minimized by use of high-efficiency, preferably vacuum, insulation. 

---