Feedback, thermal

If an appropriate thermal feedback mechanism is not provided, the reaction occurs at the lower stationary state where the reaction rate may be negligible. The reaction could be extinguished, if the temperature of the feed entering the reactor drops below some critical value due to fouling of the heat exchange surface. 

In the case of TES, the joule heating of the superconducting film produces a negative thermal feedback which increases the thermal stability. The thermal equilibrium takes place when joule heating is balanced by the thermal leak to the substrate. If for some reason in a TES, biased by a voltage V at the centre of the transition, the temperature decreases, an increase of the TES electrical resistance R takes place. Consequently, the bias power V2/R increases, bringing back the TES at the centre of the transition. 

Principally, conservation of energy for the compartment provides the important relationship to establish the extent of thermal feedback to the fuel. Conservation of mass and oxygen provide additional support equations. The process relationships, given previously, establish the important transport rates of mass and energy. These constitutive relationships may not always be complete enough to describe all fire scenarios. 

We show here that when an enzyme is immobilized within such gels it may be "switched" on and off reversibly as the temperature is cycled. Such catalytic hydrogels may be used to control reactions by a thermal feedback mechanism. 

Chemical reactions with autocatalytic or thermal feedback can combine with the diffusive transport of molecules to create a striking set of spatial or temporal patterns. A reactor with permeable wall across which fresh reactants can diffuse in and products diffuse out is an open system and so can support multiple stationary states and sustained oscillations. The diffusion processes mean that the stationary-state concentrations will vary with position in the reactor, giving a profile , which may show distinct banding (Fig. 1.16). Similar patterns are also predicted in some circumstances in closed vessels if stirring ceases. Then the spatial dependence can develop spontaneously from an initially uniform state, but uniformity must always return eventually as the system approaches equilibrium. 

This chapter and chapter 5 study the prototypical thermokinetic oscillator. Thermal feedback replaces autocatalysis, and the Arrhenius temperature dependence of rate coefficients supplies non-linearity in the scheme P - A - B + heat. After careful study of this chapter the reader should be able to ... 

The CSTR is, in many ways, the easier to set up and operate, and to analyse theoretically. Figure 6.1 shows a typical CSTR, appropriate for solution-phase reactions. In the next three chapters we will look at the wide range of behaviour which chemical systems can show when operated in this type of reactor. In this chapter we concentrate on stationary-state aspects of isothermal autocatalytic reactions similar to those introduced in chapter 2. In chapter 7, we turn to non-isothermal systems similar to the model of chapter 4. There we also draw on a mathematical technique known as singularity theory to explain the many similarities (and some differences) between chemical autocatalysis and thermal feedback. Non-stationary aspects such as oscillations appear in chapter 8. 

Chapter 6 considered isothermal autocatalysis in an open system here we study a classic case of thermal feedback. A rich variety of stationary-state patterns (bifurcation diagrams) are generated and considered here alongside those of the previous isothermal example. Flow diagrams are again illuminating and singularity theory provides a systematic approach. After study a reader should be able to ... 

Waves of chemical reaction may travel through a reaction medium, but the ideas of important stationary spatial patterns are due to Turing (1952). They were at first invoked to explain the slowly developing stripes that can be exhibited by reactions like the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction. This (rather mathematical) chapter sets out an analysis of the physically simplest circumstances but for a system (P - A - B + heat) with thermal feedback in which the internal transport of heat and matter are wholly controlled by molecular collision processes of thermal conductivity and diffusion. After a careful study the reader should be able to ... 

In many other cases it is not at all clear that these exothermic reactions are operated in such a way that the system can remain isothermal. Self-heating and hence thermal feedback routes can be expected to have a strong autocatalytic effect on the reaction, perhaps in addition to chemical mechanisms. Recent modelling invoking cellular automata (Jaeger et al. 1985) has been to some extent successful at matching qualitatively many of the rather exotic responses which have been observed experimentally. 

What happens in broad outline when a material bums is schematically indicated in Fig. 26.4. Fundamentally there are two consecutive chemical processes decomposition and combustion, connected by ignition and thermal feedback. Primarily the material... 

The second issue for cooled tubular reactors is how to introduce the coolant. One option is to provide a large flowrate of nearly constant temperature, as in a recirculation loop for a jacketed CSTR. Another option is to use a moderate coolant flowrate in countercurrent operation as in a regular heat exchanger. A third choice is to introduce the coolant cocurrently with the reacting fluids (Borio et al., 1989). This option has some definite benefits for control as shown by Bucala et al. (1992). One of the reasons cocurrent flow is advantageous is that it does not introduce thermal feedback through the coolant. It is always good to avoid positive feedback since it creates nonmonotonic exit temperature responses and the possibility for open-loop unstable steady states. 

It now looks as if we have achieved the best of all worlds a thermally efficient process with an easy-to-control reactor Can this be true Not quite. What we forget are the undesirable effects on the reactor that thermal feedback introduces. In Chap. 4 we explained in detail how7 process feedback is responsible for the same issues we tried to avoid in the first place by selecting an adiabatic plug-flow reactor. It is necessary that we take a close look at the steady-state and dynamic characteristics of FEHE systems. 

Just as we approached reactor control in Chap. 4, we will start by exploring the open-loop effects of thermal feedback. Consider Fig. 5.19, which shows an adiabatic plug-flow reactor with an FEHE system. We have also included two manipulated variables that wall later turn out to be useful to control the reactor. One of these manipulated variables is the heat load to the furnace and the other is the bypass around the preheater. It is clear that the reactor feed temperature is affected by the bypass valve position and the furnace heat load but also by the reactor exit temperature through the heat exchanger. This creates the possibility for multiple steady states. We can visualize the different... 

They subsequently (2) developed a one-dimensional mathematical model in the form of coupled differential and integro-differential equations, based on a gross mechanism for the chemical kinetics and on thermal feedback by wall-to-wall radiation, conduction in the tube wall, and convection between the gas stream and the wall. This model yielded results by numerical integration which were in good agreement with the experimental measurements for the 9.53-mm tube. For this tube diameter, the flows of unbumed gas for stable flames were in the turbulent regime. 

THERMAL FEEDBACK IGNITION, EXTINCTION AND SINGULARITY THEORY... 

Here, Tad To = qao/CpP is the temperature rise that occurs under adiabatic conditions accompanying complete consumption of the reactant A. Because of this relationship, the temperature and the reactant concentration are not independent (this relationship is only true under adiabatic conditions), and so the instantaneous reaction rate can be expressed in terms of one of these quantities alone, e.g., we can express R as R ) as in the previous section. A typical form for the reaction rate curve is shown in Fig. 5.1(d). This shows the nature of thermal feedback even in this very simple chemical example. At low extents of reaction, the increase in k as T increases dominates and the rate, which is relatively low when = 0 so that T = To, increases as the reaction proceeds. Only at very high extents of reaction, i.e., close to complete consumption of the reactant, does the rate fall, approaching zero as 1. The curve has some similarities with the cubic autocatalytic curve but thermal feedback tends to have a shallower initial development and its maximum at higher f. 

One more model scheme is of interest the Gray-Yang model for some aspects of the low temperature oxidation of hydrocarbons [18-21]. This involves the features of chemical and thermal feedback described previously with a chain-carrier X coupled to the temperature T. Four reaction steps are required ... 

The first two represent the high-temperature chemistry and the second two the branch chain of the low-temperature chemistry. Griffiths [85] has criticized the model for losing the essential feature of alkane autoignition chemistry, a switch from radical branching to non-branching reactions as the temperature increases, which is responsible for the negative temperature coefficient. The model relies on thermal feedback mechanisms only. 

---