Thermal diffusion model

The model of thermal diffusion, however, suffers from the following shortcomings. First, it does not agree with the results of direct measurements of the rate of diffusion-controlled electron transfer reactions near the temperatures of solid matrix devitrification (cf. Chap. 6, Sect. 4). Extrapolation of the values obtained in these experiments to the region of lower temperatures has shown that at these temperatures the rate of diffusion must be many orders of magnitude less than the observed rates of electron transfer reactions. 

Secondly, the model of thermal diffusion does not allow one to explain the independence of the reaction rate on temperature observed for many low-temperature electron transfer processes. Indeed, the thermal diffusion of molecules in liquids and solids is known to be an activated process and its rate must be dependent on temperature. True, at low temperatures when activated processes are very slow, diffusion itself can be assumed to become a non-activated process going on via a mechanism of nuclear tunneling, i.e. by tunneling transitions of atoms over very short (less than 1 A) distances. A sequence of such transitions can, in principle, result in a diffusional approach of reagents in the matrix. Direct tunneling of the electron, whose mass is less than that of an atom by a factor of 10 or 104, can, however, be expected to proceed much faster. 

Another drawback of the thermal diffusion model is the lack of a physically substantiated explanation of why the character of the reacting particle distribution over the time of settled life at different points of the matrix (i.e. over the values of the energy and entropy of activation for diffusion) 

In view of the lack of a clear understanding of the physical picture of the process, the thermal diffusion model has no predictive power. On its basis, for example, the manner in which the kinetic curves for low-temperature electron transfer reactions should change with changing concentration or kind of spatial distribution of reagents cannot be predicted. By contrast, the model of electron tunneling permits such predictions, and these predictions have been shown above (see, for example, Chap. 6, Sect. 3) to agree with the experiments. 

the model of long-range electron tunneling possesses a number of important advantages over that of thermal diffusion. 

---

Turbulent Thermal Diffusivity Model Table 2.1 Model constants of Eq. (2.10) by different aufhcn ... 

Thermal transpiration and thermal diffusion effects have been neglected in developing the dusty gas model, and will be neglected throughout the rest of the text. The physics of these phenomena and the justification for neglecting them are discussed in some detail in Appendix I. 

When developing the dusty gas model flux relations in Chapter 3, the thermal diffusion contributions to the flux vectors, defined by equations (3.2), were omitted. The effect of retaining these terms is to augment the final flux relations (5.4) by terms proportional to the temperature gradient. Specifically, equations (5.4) are replaced by the following generalization... 

Finally, let us return to the question of the practical importance of thermal diffusion and thermal transpiration in modeling reactive catalyst... 

It appears that the complete model for both mass and heat transfer contains four adjustable constants, Dr, Er, K and Xr, but Er and Xr are constrained by the usual relationship between thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity... 

The Chemkin package deals with problems that can be stated in terms of equation of state, thermodynamic properties, and chemical kinetics, but it does not consider the effects of fluid transport. Once fluid transport is introduced it is usually necessary to model diffusive fluxes of mass, momentum, and energy, which requires knowledge of transport coefficients such as viscosity, thermal conductivity, species diffusion coefficients, and thermal diffusion coefficients. Therefore, in a software package analogous to Chemkin, we provide the capabilities for evaluating these coefficients. ... 

The second assumption has been effectively invalidated by the discovery of the hydrated electron. However, the effects of LET and solute concentration on molecular yields indicate that some kind of radical diffusion model is indeed required. Kuppermann (1967) and Schwarz (1969) have demonstrated that the hydrated electron can be included in such a model. Schwarz (1964) remarked that Magee s estimate of the distance traveled by the electron at thermalization (on the order of a few nanometers) was correct, but his conjecture about its fate was wrong. On the other hand, Platzman was correct about its fate—namely, solvation—but wrong about the distance traveled (tens of nanometers). 

As we have seen, the electric state of a surface depends on the spatial distribution of free (electronic or ionic) charges in its neighborhood. The distribution is usually idealized as an electric double layer one layer is envisaged as a fixed charge or surface charge attached to the particle or solid surface while the other is distributed more or less diffusively in the liquid in contact (Gouy-Chapman diffuse model, Fig. 3.2). A balance between electrostatic and thermal forces is attained. 

Furzikov79 proposed a thermal model to describe the etching rate that led to an inverse square root dependence of the threshold fluence on a modified absorption coefficient, aeff, which includes possible changes in the singlephoton absorption coefficient owing to thermal diffusion. This inverse square root relation is given by... 

To model diffraction intensities, detector effects and the background intensity from thermal diffuse scattering must be included. A general expression for the theoretical intensity considering all of these factors is... 

---