Thermal conductivity processing methods

Heat is transferred through slags by a variety of mechanisms which include convection, radiation and various thermal conduction processes, viz. thermal ("phonon") conductivity, (k ), electronic conductivity (kg ) and radiation conductivity (k ). Methods for estimating the various physical properties involved in these processes are considered below. 

The thermal conductivity of polymeric fluids is very low and hence the main heat transport mechanism in polymer processing flows is convection (i.e. corresponds to very high Peclet numbers the Peclet number is defined as pcUUk which represents the ratio of convective to conductive energy transport). As emphasized before, numerical simulation of convection-dominated transport phenomena by the standard Galerkin method in a fixed (i.e. Eulerian) framework gives unstable and oscillatory results and cannot be used. 

Control of sonochemical reactions is subject to the same limitation that any thermal process has the Boltzmann energy distribution means that the energy per individual molecule wiU vary widely. One does have easy control, however, over the energetics of cavitation through the parameters of acoustic intensity, temperature, ambient gas, and solvent choice. The thermal conductivity of the ambient gas (eg, a variable He/Ar atmosphere) and the overaU solvent vapor pressure provide easy methods for the experimental control of the peak temperatures generated during the cavitational coUapse. 

Conduction takes place at a solid, liquid, or vapor boundary through the collisions of molecules, without mass transfer taking place. The process of heat conduction is analogous to that of electrical conduction, and similar concepts and calculation methods apply. The thermal conductivity of matter is a physical property and is its ability to conduct heat. Thermal conduction is a function of both the temperature and the properties of the material. The system is often considered as being homogeneous, and the thermal conductivity is considered constant. Thermal conductivity, A, W m, is defined using Fourier s law. 

In design considerations for Thermonized process lines, temperatures may be determined by the Stagnation Method. The calculations involved in this method are based on static conditions where process fluid flow is not present, and are independent of the viscosity, density and thermal conductivity of the process fluid. The process temperature may be calculated from the following relationship ... 

For certain products, skill is required to estimate a product s performance under steady-state heat-flow conditions, especially those made of RPs (Fig. 7-19). The method and repeatability of the processing technique can have a significant effect. In general, thermal conductivity is low for plastics and the plastic s structure does not alter its value significantly. To increase it the usual approach is to add metallic fillers, glass fibers, or electrically insulating fillers such as alumina. Foaming can be used to decrease thermal conductivity. 

Forced-Convection Flow. Heat transfer in pol3rmer processing is often dominated by the uVT flow advectlon terms the "Peclet Number" Pe - pcUL/k can be on the order of 10 -10 due to the polymer s low thermal conductivity. However, the inclusion of the first-order advective term tends to cause instabilities in numerical simulations, and the reader is directed to Reference (7) for a valuable treatment of this subject. Our flow code uses a method known as "streamline upwindlng" to avoid these Instabilities, and this example is intended to illustrate the performance of this feature. 

SL thermometry) exhibiting a strong dependence on thermal conductivity, the more spatially and temporally averaged temperature (from the MRR method), which is more representative for sonochemical processes, does not show such dependence. It is probable that it is actually the water vapour content within the bubble not the gas itself that dictates the bubble temperature. 

Hyphenated methods can be divided into two types those that do and those that do not destroy the sample in the process of analysis. Spectrophotometric methods, thermal conductivity, and refractive index methods of detection do not destroy the sample. Chromatographic methods using flame ionization and similar detection methods destroy the sample as it is detected. Any hyphenated method that involves MS or thermal analysis (TA) will also destroy the sample. In most cases, the identification of the components in soil is most important, so the destruction of the analyte is of less importance. 

The temperature of molten polymer process streams is commonly measured using a thermocouple positioned through a transfer line wall and partially immersed in the polymer stream. Process stream temperature measurements that use an exposed-tip thermocouple, however, can be misleading since the temperature of the thermocouple junction is a balance between the heat transferred from the polymer stream and from the thermocouple assembly [39]. Due to the low heat transfer rate between the polymer and the exposed tip and the high thermal conductivity of the thermocouple sheath, the temperatures measured can be different by up to 35°C depending on conditions. Extrudate temperatures, however, can be accurately measured using a preheated, handheld thermocouple probe. This method minimizes thermal conduction through the probe sheath. 

The analysis of polymer processing is reduced to the balance equations, mass or continuity, energy, momentum and species and to some constitutive equations such as viscosity models, thermal conductivity models, etc. Our main interest is to solve this coupled nonlinear system of equations as accurately as possible with the least amount of computational effort. In order to do this, we simplify the geometry, we apply boundary and initial conditions, we make some physical simplifications and finally we chose an appropriate constitutive equations for the problem. At the end, we will arrive at a mathematical formulation for the problem represented by a certain function, say / (x, T, p, u,...), valid for a domain V. Due to the fact that it is impossible to obtain an exact solution over the entire domain, we must introduce discretization, for example, a grid. The grid is just a domain partition, such as points for finite difference methods, or elements for finite elements. Independent of whether the domain is divided into elements or points, the solution of the problem is always reduced to a discreet solution of the problem variables at the points or nodal pointsinxxnodes. The choice of grid, i.e., type of element, number of points or nodes, directly affects the solution of the problem. 

The physical property monitors of ASPEN provide very complete flexibility in computing physical properties. Quite often a user may need to compute a property in one area of a process with high accuracy, which is expensive in computer time, and then compromise the accuracy in another area, in order to save computer time. In ASPEN, the user can do this by specifying the method or "property route", as it is called. The property route is the detailed specification of how to calculate one of the ten major properties for a given vapor, liquid, or solid phase of a pure component or mixture. Properties that can be calculated are enthalpy, entropy, free energy, molar volume, equilibrium ratio, fugacity coefficient, viscosity, thermal conductivity, diffusion coefficient, and thermal conductivity. 

The balance between conduction and diffusion still operates for a much larger isolated wet object, provided radiation is excluded. This is the basis of the wet bulb thermometer method for measuring humidity. The actual rate of evaporation now is not as simply determined and is influenced by wind. The wet bulb temperature is almost independent of wind condition, owing to a convenient accident. Heat conduction is a diffusion process, and the diffusion coefficient for water vapor in air (0.24 sq. cm./sec.) is numerically close to the diffusion coefficient of temperature in air (thermal conductivity/specific heat = 0.20 sq. cm./sec.). Hence, the exact way in which each molecular diffusion process merges into the more rapid eddy diffusion process is not important because no matter how complex the transition is, it must be quantitatively similar for the two processes. 

If a hot steel ball were immersed in a cool pan of water, the lumped-heat-capacity method of analysis might be used if we could justify an assumption of uniform ball temperature during the cooling process. Clearly, the temperature distribution in the ball would depend on the thermal conductivity of the ball material and the heat-transfer conditions from the surface of the ball to the surrounding fluid, i.e., the surface-convection heat-transfer coefficient. We should obtain a reasonably uniform temperature distribution in the ball if the resistance to heat transfer by conduction were small compared with the convection resistance at the surface, so that the major temperature gradient would occur through the fluid layer at the surface. The lumped-heat-capacity analysis, then, is one which assumes that the internal resistance of the body is negligible in comparison with the external resistance. 

---