The world as it is

For example hundreds or thousands stores with ammonia may be found every where in the world, as it is used in food processing facilities such as breweries, dairy works or slaughter works. 

Putting it tendentiously and imprecisely, Kant held that the world as we know it is constituted, in part, by a conceptual scheme. This is tendentious, because Kant -like many other authors mentioned or hinted at in this sketch - never used the term conceptual scheme . It is also imprecise, because it lumps together two things the forms of sensibility - space and time -, which are not conceptual and play part in shaping the sensory manifold, and the a priori concepts, the categories , which create the world of appearances out of the sensory manifold. Nevertheless, the view to be developed here is a distant descendant of Kant s view, and the notion of conceptual scheme, as I shall understand it, is indeed rooted in his work. I shall maintain that there is a distinction between the world as it is and the way it appears to us, the noumena and the phenomena, in Kant s terms. The world as we know it is constituted by conceptual schemes. What conceptual schemes do is thus roughly similar to what Kant s forms of sensibility and a priori concepts do. So let me continue with the history of the notion. 

This is really a version of the many worlds problem pointed out in the Introduction, which the hermeneutic and the Kuhnian notion of conceptual schemes had to face. If the world of our knowledge is constituted by conceptual schemes, and we cannot talk about the world as it is in itself, it becomes difficult to maintain that there is a single underlying world. 

Metaphysical realism grants the possibility of an external, inaccessible and privileged perspective. Indeed, metaphysical realism is the position which grants this possibility. According to metaphysical realism, the world is ontologically independent of the human mind, and truth is the description of the world as it is in itself. If you wish, truth is the description of the world from the world s own perspective, from a perspective which is not tied to any particular subject. In Nagel s... 

It is reasonable to suggest that disasters are probably one of the greatest global threats to the existence of the human race. This proposition exists even before consideration is given to the increased threat of pandemics. To date, most disasters have been caused by natural phenomena such as drought, windstorms, and floods. For this reason, it is necessary to consider the impact of natural disasters on the world, as it is from this source that the greatest demand is placed on nursing internationally. 

The matter of secondary causality was taken up in later years by Voetius, the most important interpreter of strict Calvinism in the Low Countries. According to Van Ruler Voetius opposed the mechanical philosophy of Descartes, who had argued that God s act of keeping the world as it is, is identical to the act by which he created it. Descartes believed nature is guided by a divine concurrence, to operate as it normally does, an opinion which, according to Voetius did not leave much space for divine intervention and... 

The intent here is to give only a brief summary of the methodology by which the studies were carried out. Briefly, input-output analysis was the basic tool used. The economy was modeled as a steady state, full employment economy for 1975 and 1978 for the corrosion and fracture studies respectively. The economy was broken down into 130 sectors for the corrosion study and 150 sectors for fracture study. In both cases, capital equipment was treated as an input into production rather than a part of final demand as normally done. Having established the steady state for the chosen year for the world as it is (World I), steady state World II (corrosion or fracture free world) and World III (best practical world) were established. Final demand and the coefficients in the transactions matrix and the flow and stock capital matrices were changed as appropriate. In the case of the flow matrix, changes in the coefficients by column were collected in a special "social savings row. This precluded the necessity to renormalize the coefficients and gave a convenient way for... 

Perhaps, I should say as Latour must overlook since he sets to out to provide without reference to mental entities (ideas, beliefs) a symmetrical anthropology that can explain the world as it is today that is, it can explain what is and through what activity it has become differentiated. In contrast, the metaphysical stance reflects on our representations of the world. Once one considers thinking a powerful, consequential, and continuous human activity that occasionally produces representations, one can appreciate the relation between Latour s dynamically continuous metachemistry and a statically reflective metaphysics. 

I neither believe that the world is perfect nor that it would not be a good idea to attempt to improve it, but I believe, by and large, that drug developers have to take the world as it is and make a good job given the existing constraints. And I have nothing but contempt for the cant of certain critics of the clinical trial. 

Such realizations need be no more disturbing than those associated with the probabilities of disease. Indeed, if we find ourselves having led healthy lives for so many years, we all know deep in our hearts that that is no guarantee that we will not be hospitalized, or worse, tomorrow. We have seen members of our families and friends struck suddenly with cancer or back trouble or a heart attack or the bite of an insect. Or we have known someone in his or her prime struck down by a car or taken as the victim of an airplane crash or a freak accident or even a structural failure. If we were immobilized by the fear of.such a fate, we might have to be institutionalized, for we would cease to be able to function in the world as it is. Lightning strikes, and some time it might strike us. We must accept this as a cost of the pleasures of life, and we have no choice. We risk remote dangers every day for the benefit of the pleasures of the day. 

The characteristic refiexivity of human cognition means that we are not only able to perceive the world as it is, that is, to perceive the affordances that actually surround us, but also to perceive affordances that do not yet exist, that is, to perceive the world as if it were otherwise. 

Immanuel Kant introdnced the distinction between the world in itself and the world as it appears to ns. As we are finite beings and only have limited cognitive capacities we cannot know the world as it is in itself. All objects we identify and develop knowledge about are already shaped by our form of perception and by our conceptual system. Things in themselves are not accessible to us. Only things as they appear to us can be known. In science one goes even further. Only objects that are abstract and conceptual in nature - model objects - are accessible to sdentiflc scrutiny. Hence, scientific statements about the world do not in any sense refer directly to objects in a world completely independently of us. They do neither refer to things in themselves nor to objects as they appear to us in practical life. 

Scientists study the world as it is Engineers create the world that has never been. 

---