The strengths of chemical bonds

The strength of the chemical bond in a diatomic molecule can be expressed by the bond dissociation enthalpy, D. This is equal to the standard enthalpy change, A/f, for a reaction in which the bond is broken. For the dissociation of hydrogen chloride  

This value tells us that the H—Cl bond is very strong nearly as strong as the H—H bond, the strongest two-electron bond between identical atoms, for which D(H—H) 

Bond enthalpy terms are quantities, which when summed over all the bonds in a free molecule give the atomization energy. An essential part of this idea is the assumption that the bond enthalpy term for a particular type of bond does not 

As the molecule contains one 0—0 and two O—H bonds, this quantity is [5(0—0) + 25(0—H)]. Assuming that 5(0—H) here is the same as in H2O, 5(0—0) = 144 kj moF. Some bond enthalpy terms are recorded in Table 4.1. The assumption that they do not change from one type of molecule to another is only approximately correct, but it is sufficiently valid to make it useful. Bond enthalpy terms can, for example, be used to estimate the enthalpies of formation of nonexistent compounds. 

The most stable conformation of the hydrogen peroxide molecule. There is fairly free rotation about the 0—0 bond, but in the conformation of lowest energy the two O—H bonds are at an angle of 111.5 . 

---

Source T. L. Cottrell, The Strengths of Chemical Bonds, 2d ed., Butterworth, London, 1958 B. deB. Darwent, National ... 

Hardness is a somewhat ambiguous property. A dictionary definition is that it is a property of something that is not easily penetrated, spread, or scratched. These behaviors involve very different physical mechanisms. The first relates to elastic stiffness, the second to plastic deformation, and the third to fracturing. But, for many substances, the mechanisms of these are closely related because they all involve the strength of chemical bonding (cohesion). Thus discussion of the mechanism for one case may provide some understanding of all three. 

Our discussion has so far ignored the effect of relaxation, namely spin flip of electrons in a time comparable to the Larmor precession period ( 1 ). The apparent low field (weak bonding) component in the analysis above might be the result of relaxation. However, the decrease in relaxation time is also considered to reflect the decrease in the strength of chemical bonds between the adsorbed metal species and the substrate. Therefore, the conclusion described above is considered to remain valid. 

The enthalpies of phase transition, such as fusion (Aa,s/f), vaporization (AvapH), sublimation (Asut,//), and solution (As n//), are usually regarded as thermophysical properties, because they referto processes where no intramolecular bonds are cleaved or formed. As such, a detailed discussion of the experimental methods (or the estimation procedures) to determine them is outside the scope of the present book. Nevertheless, some of the techniques addressed in part II can be used for that purpose. For instance, differential scanning calorimetry is often applied to measure A us// and, less frequently, AmpH and AsubH. Many of the reported Asu, // data have been determined with Calvet microcalorimeters (see chapter 9) and from vapor pressure against temperature data obtained with Knudsen cells [35-38]. Reaction-solution calorimetry is the main source of AsinH values. All these auxiliary values are very important because they are frequently required to calculate gas-phase reaction enthalpies and to derive information on the strengths of chemical bonds (see chapter 5)—one of the main goals of molecular energetics. It is thus appropriate to make a brief review of the subject in this introduction. 

The strength of chemical bonding in various substances is commonly measured by the thermal energy (heat) needed to separate the bonded atoms or ions into individual atoms or ions. 

Cottrell TL (1958) The strength of chemical bonds. Butterworth, London... 

Cottrell, T. L., The Strengths of Chemical Bond, Butterworths Scientific... 

There is at present no convenient, self-consistent source of all bond energies. The standard work is Cottrell. T. L. The Strengths of Chemical Bonds, 2nd ed. Butter-worths London, 1958, but it suffers from a lack of recent data. Darwent (National Bureau of Standards publication NSRDS-NBS 31, 1970) has summarized recent data on dissociation energies but did not include some earlier work or values known only for total energies of atomization rather than for stepwise dissociation. Three useful references of the latter type are Brewer, L. Brackett, E. Chem. Rev. 1961,61,425 Brewer, L. et al. Chem. Rev. 1963, 63, 111 Feber, R. C. Los Alamos Report LA-3164, 1965. The book by Darwent mentioned above also lists bond energy values for some common bonds. 

Source. T. L. Cottrell, The Strengths of Chemical Bonds, 2nd ed., Butterworth, London, 1958 B. deB. Darwent, National Standard Reference Data Series, National Bureau of Standards, no. 31, Washington, 1970 S. W. Benson, 7. Chem. Educ., 42 502... 

Coir ell, T. The Strength of Chemical Bonds. Verl Butterworth Co (London), (1958). 

So, the present study has shown that a weak magnetic field affects the processes at the surface of PS during its ageing in air. The effect consists in acceleration of breakage of Si-H bonds and in suspending the process of Si surface oxidation. It is supposed that magnetic field affects the strength of chemical bonds in surface complexes of Si nanocrystallites. 

The importance of bond stretching force constants is that they measure the strength of chemical bonds and therefore can be related to bond length r and bond order P. A useful relation between these properties is given by Gordy s equation... 

---