Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The SCF Limit

A linear extrapolation circumvents this problem. If we assume that the exponent a in Eq. (6.1) is universal, we need only two consecutive points to extrapolate, [Pg.114]


First, some large basis set SCF calculations of the infrared and Raman intensities in H2O, NHj and CH4 will be given. The choice of basis set is one of computational chemistry s perennial problems. For some particularly simple systems, it is possible to draw some conclusions from symmetry. For example, in an atom with occupied s and p orbitals, the dipole polarizability cannot be obtained reliably without d functions, and the quadrupole polarizability would require f functions. Similarly in a linear molecule with occupied geometric derivative of the wavefunction in the same linear molecule would also require d orbitals. However, these arguments cannot be absolute. For a start, the language used is based upon the SCF model. More particularly, most molecules have no symmetry—it is possible in principle to reach the SCF limit for a molecule with no symmetry by using only... [Pg.131]

Figure 3 A schematic illustration on how the exact quantum limit can be reached through either the multitrajectory approach or a multiconfiguration self-consistent field theory. Correction terms e (t) are introduced to reach the SCF-limit retaining a trajectory concept... Figure 3 A schematic illustration on how the exact quantum limit can be reached through either the multitrajectory approach or a multiconfiguration self-consistent field theory. Correction terms e (t) are introduced to reach the SCF-limit retaining a trajectory concept...
For the case of intramolecular energy transfer from excited vibrational states, a mixed quantum-classical treatment was given by Gerber et al. already in 1982 [101]. These authors used a time-dependent self-consistent field (TDSCF) approximation. In the classical limit of TDSCF averages over wave functions are replaced by averages over bundles of trajectories, each obtained by SCF methods. [Pg.16]

You can usually use the default values. If the calculation exceeds the iteration limit before it reaches the convergcriec limit, llieti th ere is m osl I ikely con vergeri ce failti re. Sim ply in creasin g tli e limits is un likely to help, I ll e nils COM vergeii ce accelerator, (see SCF Convergence on page 47), wli ich is available for all the SCF... [Pg.118]

To provide further insight why the SCF mean-field model in electronic structure theory is of limited accuracy, it can be noted that the average value of the kinetic energy plus the attraction to the Be nucleus plus the SCF interaction potential for one of the 2s orbitals of Be with the three remaining electrons in the s 2s configuration is ... [Pg.232]

Convergence limit and Iteration limit specify the precision of the SCF calculation. Con vergen ce lim it refers to th e difference in total electronic energy (in kcal/mol) between two successive SCF iterations yielding a converged result. Iteration limit specifies the maximum number of iterations allowed to reach that goal. [Pg.112]

Adsorption and Desorption Adsorbents may be used to recover solutes from supercritical fluid extracts for example, activated carbon and polymeric sorbents may be used to recover caffeine from CO9. This approach may be used to improve the selectivity of a supercritical fluid extraction process. SCF extraction may be used to regenerate adsorbents such as activated carbon and to remove contaminants from soil. In many cases the chemisorption is sufficiently strong that regeneration with CO9 is limited, even if the pure solute is quite soluble in CO9. In some cases a cosolvent can be added to the SCF to displace the sorbate from the sorbent. Another approach is to use water at elevated or even supercritical temperatures to facilitate desorption. Many of the principles for desorption are also relevant to extraction of substances from other substrates such as natural products and polymers. [Pg.2003]

SCF procedure is begun, and then used in each SCF iteration. Formally, in the large basis set limit the SCF procedure involves a computational effort which increases as the number of basis functions to the fourth power. Below it will be shown that the scaling may be substantially smaller in acmal calculations. [Pg.68]

The investigation by Mustroph et al. (1981) was made using SCF-CI with the PPP approximation to calculate the influence of substituents on the longest wavelength band. This study is interesting because the authors come to the conclusion that 591 nm is the theoretical limit that can be obtained with substituted benzenediazo-nium ions. As far as we are aware, that limit had not been reached by the early 1990s. [Pg.84]

Gaussian-type orbitals, the computational requirements grow, in the limit, with the fourth power in the number of basis functions on the SCF level and with even a higher power for methods including correlation. Both the conceptual and the computational aspects prevent the computational study of important problems such as the chemistry of transition metal surfaces, interfaces, bulk compounds, and large molecular systems. [Pg.50]

The variational theorem which has been initially proved in 1907 (24), before the birthday of the Quantum Mechanics, has given rise to a method widely employed in Qnantnm calculations. The finite-field method, developed by Cohen andRoothan (25), is coimected to this method. The Stark Hamiltonian —fi.S explicitly appears in the Fock monoelectronic operator. The polarizability is derived from the second derivative of the energy with respect to the electric field. The finite-field method has been developed at the SCF and Cl levels but the difficulty of such a method is the well known loss in the numerical precision in the limit of small or strong fields. The latter case poses several interconnected problems in the calculation of polarizability at a given order, n ... [Pg.271]

Principles and Characteristics Supercritical fluid extraction uses the principles of traditional LSE. Recently SFE has become a much studied means of analytical sample preparation, particularly for the removal of analytes of interest from solid matrices prior to chromatography. SFE has also been evaluated for its potential for extraction of in-polymer additives. In SFE three interrelated factors, solubility, diffusion and matrix, influence recovery. For successful extraction, the solute must be sufficiently soluble in the SCF. The timescale for diffusion/transport depends on the shape and dimensions of the matrix particles. Mass transfer from the polymer surface to the SCF extractant is very fast because of the high diffusivity in SCFs and the layer of stagnant SCF around the solid particles is very thin. Therefore, the rate-limiting step in SFE is either... [Pg.85]

Various models of SFE have been published, which aim at understanding the kinetics of the processes. For many dynamic extractions of compounds from solid matrices, e.g. for additives in polymers, the analytes are present in small amounts in the matrix and during extraction their concentration in the SCF is well below the solubility limit. The rate of extraction is then not determined principally by solubility, but by the rate of mass transfer out of the matrix. Supercritical gas extraction usually falls very clearly into the class of purely diffusional operations. Gere et al. [285] have reported the physico-chemical principles that are the foundation of theory and practice of SCF analytical techniques. The authors stress in particular the use of intrinsic solubility parameters (such as the Hildebrand solubility parameter 5), in relation to the solubility of analytes in SCFs and optimisation of SFE conditions. [Pg.85]

SFE can be carried out in three different ways. In a static extraction (no flow-rate), the extraction vessel is pressurised to the desired pressure with the extracting fluid and then simply left for a certain length of time. The main benefit of this method is that the fluid has time to penetrate the matrix. It is most applicable when the analyte has a high affinity for the solvent and a low affinity for the matrix and also when the solubility limit of the analyte in the fluid is much higher than the actual level reached during the extraction [89]. This method was popular in early SFE experiments but has declined in favour of dynamic SFE. Here, fresh SCF is continuously passed over the sample, extracting soluble compounds and depositing them in a suitable solvent or on a solid trap. The dynamic mode is particularly useful when the concentration of the solute... [Pg.87]

The actual SFE extraction rate is determined by the slowest of these three steps. Identification of the ratedetermining step is an important aspect in method development for SFE. The extraction kinetics in SFE may be understood by changing the extraction flow-rate. Such experiments provide valuable information about the nature of the limiting step in extraction, namely thermodynamics (i.e. the distribution of the analytes between the SCF and the sample matrix at equilibrium), or kinetics (i.e. the time required to approach that equilibrium). A general strategy for optimising experimental parameters in SFE of polymeric materials is shown in Figure 3.10. [Pg.93]

When the analyte is present in the polymer at very low concentrations some special precautions are needed to enhance the sensitivity of the extraction process, i.e. to lower the detection limit. The sample may be concentrated prior to analysis by SCF or solvent evaporation (at as low a temperature as possible to avoid degradation or partial loss of volatile analytes). Alternatively, a larger amount of polymer sample may be extracted (followed by LVI). Samples may also be concentrated or matrix effects minimised by using SPE [573,574],... [Pg.141]


See other pages where The SCF Limit is mentioned: [Pg.113]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.2340]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.37]   


SEARCH



SCF

SCF-limit

SCFs

© 2024 chempedia.info