The sample volume problem

The Sieverts techmque is sensitive to the density of the sample because the volume occupied by the sample must be subtracted from the volume of the empty sample cell in order to calculate H/X. The gravimetric technique is intrinsically sensitive to the volume or density of the sample through the buoyancy force on it. Knowledge of the sample volume is also required to 

Whatever approach is taken to characterising a gravimetric system, comparison with deuterium uptake by the same sample is a valuable check on the measured uptake of protium. 

The most common way of defining the volume of the sample is to measure the effective volume of the loaded sample cell (Sieverts technique) or the sample itself (gravimetric technique) using an inert gas. The validity of this 

When the surface area of the sample is a significant contributor to its hydrogen uptake, it is necessary to assume that the sample is equally accessible to the calibrating and working gases. As their sizes are comparable, this is less of a problem with helium and hydrogen than with, say, helium and methane. 

When the sample density changes with hydrogen concentration, the problem of uncertain density caimot be solved by calibration at H/X = 0 and the system should be designed to minimise its effect as far as possible. While materials that absorb H rather than adsorb H2 are expected to exhibit the greatest effects of hydrogen uptake on density, even adsorption systems may not be immune, as Dreisbach, et al. (2002) reported a swelling of activated carbon owing to He uptake. 

---

The problem is made more difficult because these different dispersion processes are interactive and the extent to which one process affects the peak shape is modified by the presence of another. It follows if the processes that causes dispersion in mass overload are not random, but interactive, the normal procedures for mathematically analyzing peak dispersion can not be applied. These complex interacting effects can, however, be demonstrated experimentally, if not by rigorous theoretical treatment, and examples of mass overload were included in the work of Scott and Kucera [1]. The authors employed the same chromatographic system that they used to examine volume overload, but they employed two mobile phases of different polarity. In the first experiments, the mobile phase n-heptane was used and the sample volume was kept constant at 200 pi. The masses of naphthalene and anthracene were kept... 

The actual loading capacity always depends on the sample composition and the separation problem. As a rule the volume of the loaded sample should not exceed 5% of the column volume. However, this recommendation is valid only for preparative runs. For analytical applications when a high resolution is needed, the volume of the injected sample should be about 1% of the total column volume or even less. For a preparative run on a 1000 X 200-mm column (bed height 60 cm), two different sample volumes were injected. If the sample volume is 0.3% of the total bed volume, the separation is more efficient... 

The spatial resolution of X-ray analysis carried out in the EPMA is limited to the size of the sampling volume, which is around 1 pm3. There may be many important features of a specimen which are smaller than 1 pm, and one way of overcoming the problem is by the use of thin specimens. We have seen (Figure 5.7) that the lateral spread of the electron beam increases with depth of penetration, so that in a sufficiently thin specimen the beam spread is much less. We will therefore next consider the analysis of thin foil specimens in the TEM. 

Not qualifying rotors - rotors that are not recommended for the problem usually because they are too large or too small for the sample volume, or because they do not generate sufficiently high centrifugal forces,... 

Implementation of microanalytical devices presents some issues mostly related to the scale of the volumes. In fact, successive reduction in the sample volume may compromise analysis either because the measurement limit of the analytical method is exceeded or because the sample is no longer representative of the bulk specimen. Another drawback for microchip devices is microvolume evaporation of both sample and reagent from the microchip, compromising quantitative determination or inducing unwanted hydrodynamic flows. This problem has been addressed by designing pipetting systems that automatically replace fluid lost by evaporation or by enclosing the chip in a controlled... 

Sample requirements for obtaining CD spectra of proteins are minimal. Since the bands in the far UV are much more intense than in the near UV, the amount of material needed to produce an adequate signal is much less. Typically, the concentrations employed range from 0.1 to 5.0 mg/mL. The sample volumes vary from 0.01 to 1.0 mL, so the total amount needed ranges from 5 pg to 5 mg. It should be noted that CD is a nondestructive technique, so all the material can be recovered. However, adsorption of the analyte to the surface of the cells can be a problem, especially at low concentrations [20], Various kinds of commercial instrumentation is available and this aspect of CD spectroscopy has been discussed elsewhere [21,22]. 

The chip laboratories also present some difficulties not found in macroscopic laboratories. The main problem concerns the large surface area of the capillaries and reaction chambers relative to the sample volume. Molecules or biological cells in the sample solution encounter so much wall that they may undergo unwanted reactions with the wall materials. Glass seems to present the least of these problems, and the walls of silicon chip laboratories can be protected by formation of relatively inert silicon dioxide. Because plastic is inexpensive, it seems a good choice for disposable chips, but plastic also is the most reactive with the samples and the least durable of the available materials. 

This limitation indicated by the theory regarding the sample volume injected in a GC system imposes a serious problem when analyzing traces in a given sample. The detectors used in GC have limited sensitivity (see further), and an amount of sample below a certain limit cannot be detected. Therefore, a compromise should be chosen such that the sample should be small enough to be accommodated by the chromatographic column but sufficiently large for the detector sensitivity. 

In the second method, the volume concentration is known (where in most cases the remarkable shrinking of the sample volume upon cooling is neglected) rather than the above mole ratio. The problem is that we do not know exactly how many quenching molecules are near enough to one of the polymer chains in order to efficiently trap the excitons moving along the chain. 

Detection is a continuing problem because the sample volume passing through the detector at any one time is so small, a few picoliters (pL). A sample concentration of 10 M is the normal limit, but one method has been demonstrated to detect 10 M materials uv spectroscopy, fluorescence, Raman, and electroconductivity are used for detection. 

---