Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Orange Book

CD-R (CD-recordable) is a writable, nonerasable disk, also called CD-WORM or CD-WO (CD-write once). Permanent marks are produced by a focused laser beam. The definition of the CD-R format and of the erasable—rewritable EOD /MO-R format is put down in the Orange Book (Philips/Sony). [Pg.139]

J. Inczedy, T. Lengyel, A. M. Urc, A. Gelencser, and A. Hulanicki. Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature (The Orange Book). 1997. Available at http //www.iupac.org/publications/ analytical compendium/. [Pg.14]

United Nations 1999. Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, Test and Criteria (the Orange Book), 3rd Edition. [Pg.368]

Recommendation 1 Permit only one automatic 30-month stay per drug product per ANDA to resolve infringement disputes over patents listed in the Orange Book prior to the filing date of the generic applicant s ANDA. [Pg.4]

Yes. If a brand-name company lists an additional patent in the Orange Book after the generic applicant has filed its AND A, more than one 30-month stay may be generated. The generic applicant is required to re-certify to this later-listed patent, and if, upon notice of the generic s re-certification, the brand-name company sues within 45 days, then FDA approval of the generic s previously filed ANDAis stayed for an additional 30-months from the notice date or until a court decision in the newly instituted patent litigation. [Pg.5]

From 1992 through 2000, brand-name companies have listed patents in the Orange Book after an ANDA has been filed for the drug product in 8 instances 6 of these 8 instances occurred since 1998. For the 8 drug products, the additional delay of FDA approval caused by the additional 30-month stay (beyond the first 30-month stay) ranged from 4 to 40 months. In all 4 of the... [Pg.5]

As a result, there is no mechanism to delist an improperly listed patent from the Orange Book. The laek of such a mechanism may have real world consequences in that the Commission is aware of at least a few instanees in which a 30-month stay was generated solely by a patent that raised legitimate listability questions. [Pg.7]

Thus, the usual patent protections would remain for hrand-name companies whose patents may he listed in the Orange Book after the filing of a generic applicant s ANDA solely hecause it took a long time for the Patent Office to issue the patent. [Pg.7]

Id. at 355(j)(2)(B). Although the patent holder and the NDA filer are often the same person, this is not always the case. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments require that all patents that claim the drug described in an NDA must be fisted in the Orange Book. Occasionally, this requires an NDA filer to list a patent that it does not own. [Pg.23]

Out of 40 drug products in Table 2-4, 11 drug products had at least one patent listed in the Orange Book that was... [Pg.36]

See Chapter 4 for a full discussion of multiple 30-month stays. Both suits on the later-issued patents raised questions whether the patents should be listed in the Orange Book. [Pg.39]

Moreover, most of the later-issued patents in the Orange Book raise questions about whether the FDA s patent listing... [Pg.56]

The FDA has adopted regulations governing the types of patents that can be listed in the Orange Book. The listing regulation is separated into 6 subsections below for ease of reading. Specifically, the brand-name company must list in the Orange Book each patent which ... [Pg.58]

Several generic applicants have attempted to obtain court orders requiring the FDA or brand-name companies to delist certain patents from the Orange Book. [Pg.60]

The FDA has stated that it laeks the resources and the expertise to review patents submitted with NDAs. The ageney does not ensure that a submitted patent elaims the approved drug before listing it in the Orange Book. Moreover, the FDA has deelined to enaet any administrative proeedures for resolving listing disputes. If a party disputes the accuracy of a listed patent, it may notify... [Pg.60]

Box 4-2 Private Parties Have No Right to Seek the Deiisting of a Patent in the Orange Book... [Pg.61]

The issue of whether a generic applicant could seek to delist a patent fiom the Orange Book was recently addressed in a court decision regarding BuSpar. Bristol-Myers Squibb ( BMS ) had listed one patent in the Orange Book relating to buspirone (Patent No. [Pg.61]


See other pages where The Orange Book is mentioned: [Pg.48]    [Pg.774]    [Pg.775]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.61]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 , Pg.38 , Pg.39 , Pg.40 , Pg.41 , Pg.42 ]




SEARCH



Orange Book

The Electronic Orange Book

© 2024 chempedia.info