The Lewis Acid-Base Model

IBLG See questions from The Lewis Acid-Base Model  

We have seen that the first successful conceptualization of acid-base behavior was proposed by Arrhenius. This useful but limited model was replaced by the more general Br0nsted-Lowry model. An even more general model for acid-base behavior was suggested by G. N. Lewis in the early 1920s. A Lewis acid is an electron-pair acceptor, and a Lewis base is an electron-pair donor. Another way of saying this is that a Lewis acid has an empty atomic orbital that it can use to accept (share) an electron pair from a molecule that has a lone pair of electrons (Lewis base). The three models for acids and bases are summarized in Table 14.10. 

Note that Br0nsted-Lowry acid-base reactions (proton donor-proton acceptor reactions) are encompassed by the Lewis model. For example, the reaction between a proton and an ammonia molecule, that is. 

Lewis Electron-pair acceptor Electron-pair donor 

Unless otherwise noted, all art on this page is Cengage Learning 2014. 

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. 

The Lewis model encompasses the Brdnsted-Lowry model, but the reverse is not true. 

---

The Lewis acid-base model is the most general of the three we have considered. 

Many years ago, geochemists recognized that whereas some metallic elements are found as sulfides in the Earth s crust, others are usually encountered as oxides, chlorides, or carbonates. Copper, lead, and mercury are most often found as sulfide ores Na and K are found as their chloride salts Mg and Ca exist as carbonates and Al, Ti, and Fe are all found as oxides. Today chemists understand the causes of this differentiation among metal compounds. The underlying principle is how tightly an atom binds its valence electrons. The strength with which an atom holds its valence electrons also determines the ability of that atom to act as a Lewis base, so we can use the Lewis acid-base model to describe many affinities that exist among elements. This notion not only explains the natural distribution of minerals, but also can be used to predict patterns of chemical reactivity. 

All Bronsted-Lowry acids (proton donors) are also Lewis acids, and all Bronsted-Lowry bases (proton acceptors) are also Lewis bases. But the Lewis acid-base model is far more general in that it applies to reactions beyond just proton transfers. 

Use the Lewis acid-base model to explain the following reaction. 

The Lewis acid-base model removes that restriction. A Lewis acid is a species that in an acid-base reaction, accepts an electron pair. In this reaction, a Lewis base donates the electron pair. 

According to the Haaland model, an increase of the Lewis acid-base interaction is accompanied by a decrease of both the R—Al—R bond angles and the Al—R bond distances. However, comparisons are possible only for adducts containing the same alane to exclude any steric or electronic effects of... 

Transmetalation of the perrhenate/aluminosilsesquioxane cube model with SnMe4 is considerably more exothermic than for the perrhenate/silsesquioxane cube model. A similar grafted trimethyltin fragment is formed, as is MeReOs however, the latter is not liberated. It remains bound to the aluminosilsesquioxane cube via the Lewis acid-base interaction with the A1 center. The optimized structure also contains a Lewis acid-base interaction between Re and an adjacent framework oxygen... 

Retention of Rohrschneider-McReynolds standards of selected chiral alcohols and ketones was measured to determine the thermodynamic selectivity parameters of stationary phases containing (- -)-61 (M = Pr, Eu, Dy, Er, Yb, n = 3, R = Mef) dissolved in poly(dimethylsiloxane) . Separation of selected racemic alcohols and ketones was achieved and the determined values of thermodynamic enantioselectivity were correlated with the molecular structure of the solutes studied. The decrease of the ionic radius of lanthanides induces greater increase of complexation efficiency for the alcohols than for the ketone coordination complexes. The selectivity of the studied stationary phases follows a common trend which is rationalized in terms of opposing electronic and steric effects of the Lewis acid-base interactions between the selected alcohols, ketones and lanthanide chelates. The retention of over fifty solutes on five stationary phases containing 61 (M = Pr, Eu, Dy, Er, Yb, n = 3, R = Mef) dissolved in polydimethylsiloxane were later measured ". The initial motivation for this work was to explore the utility of a solvation parameter model proposed and developed by Abraham and coworkers for complexing stationary phases containing metal coordination centers. Linear solvation... 

TAS is larger. CH4 is also intriguing because there are several possible coordination modes in analogy with isoelectronic metal borohydride complexes (Figure 12.6). A beautiful model complex for coordination is the Lewis acid-base adduct of CH3BeCp with CpfYb synthesized by Bums and Andersen.68 The dYbC, 2.766(4)A, is similar to that in CpJYb( -C2H4)Pt(PPh3)2 but shorter than in a MeC CMe... 

Note that the SO3 molecule, a Lewis acid, accepts an electron pair from the ion, a Lewis base. The Arrhenius, Bronsted-Lowry, and Lewis acid-base models are summarized in Table 18-2. 

The most general view of acids and bases was advanced by G. N. Lewis. In this model, acids are substances which have an affinity for lone electron pairs, and bases are substances which possess lone electron pairs. Water and ammonia are the most common substances which possess lone electron pairs, and therefore behave as bases in the Lewis scheme. The reaction of silver ion, Ag with cyanide ion, CN , and boron trifluoride, BF3 (an electron-deficient compound), with ammonia, NH3, are two examples of Lewis acid-base reactions. The Lewis acid-base concept is most useful in chemical reactions in nonaqueous solvents. We will not find it useful in our study of ionic equilibria in water. 

Fa 75]. The examinations in effect demonstrated that in the description of the solvent effect it is sufficient to take into account the specific solvent-solute (i.e., the Lewis acid-base) interactions, since in any case these also reflect the non-specific interactions. This consideration is accepted in the model of Krygowski and Fawcett [Kr 75] called the complementary Lewis acid-base description of solvent effects . 

The model of Krygowski and Fawcett [Kr 75], developed for the description of the solvent effect and taking into account exclusively the Lewis acid-base properties of the solvent, also appears suitable for the description of the solvent dependence of the chemical shift. For example, this model reflects well the results of the Na resonance studies by Erlich et al referred to earlier [Er 70, Er 71, Gr 73]. In addition to the interaction between the sodium ion and the solvent, it also points to the dependence of the chemical shift on the concentration as a result of ion-pair formation. However, the authors themselves [Fa 76] reported that the model was unsuitable for the description of other NMR data reflecting the solvent effect. 

In this reaction, ferrous iron, a Lewis acid, reacts with the lone pair electrons on water molecules, which are Lewis bases, to form a hydrated cation, a Lewis adduct. Although the sulfate ion also interacts with water molecules, this interaction is much weaker than the Lewis acid-base interaction of the ferrous iron. Many, perhaps all, chemical reactions can be viewed as Lewis acid-base interactions, making this theory very useful for developing models of reaction mechanisms. 

In a large part of the (current) literature the Lifshitz-van der Waals component (o, is simply termed dispersion component and the Lewis acid-base interactions (o ) are interpreted as polar interactions even though the material s dipole moments may be zero or the interactions originating from permanent dipoles are very small and can be easily associated with the dispersion part [6]. The misleading denominations go back to a historical misidentification of the acid-base interactions as polar interactions in the Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble [7-9] approach to calculate the IFT [6] (OWRK model). However, as an impact on the SFE calculation by this misinterpretation of this old theory occurs only when a monopolar base interacts with a monopolar acid, this nomenclature is still widely used. And here in this work we will also use the terms dispersion and po/ar interactions to differentiate the two major contributions to SFE, ST, and IFT. For a detailed discussion of the use of contact angles in determining SFE of solids and other methods of determining SFE, see Etzler [10]. 

Although this experiment is written as a dry-lab, it can be adapted to the laboratory. Details are given for the determination of the equilibrium constant for the binding of the Lewis base 1-methylimidazole to the Lewis acid cobalt(II)4-trifluoromethyl-o-phenylene-4,6-methoxysalicylideniminate in toluene. The equilibrium constant is found by a linear regression analysis of the absorbance data to a theoretical equilibrium model. 

The parameters and Ca are associated with the Lewis acid, and Eg and Cb with the base. a and b are interpreted as measures of electrostatic interaction, and Ca and Cb as measures of covalent interaction. Drago has criticized the DN approach as being based upon a single model process, and this objection applies also to the — A/y fBFs) model. Drago s criticism is correct, yet we should be careful not to reject a simple concept provided its limits are appreciated. Indeed, many very useful chemical quantities are subject to this criticism for example, p o values are measures of acid strength with reference to the base water. 

The synthesis of three silaketenimines 105a-c prompted Tokitoh and Okazaki to calculate the optimized geometry of a model compound, PhiSiCNPh. This model reinforced that 105a-c are truly Lewis acid-base pairs, with the isocyanide donating its carbon lone pair to an empty p-orbital perpendicular to the lone pair... 

TS, which is usually based on the chair (Zimmerman-Traxler) model. This pattern is particularly prevalent for the allylic borane reagents, where the Lewis acidity of boron promotes a tight cyclic TS, but at the same time limits the possibility of additional chelation. The dominant factors in these cases are the E- or Z-configuration of the allylic reagent and the conformational preferences of the reacting aldehyde (e.g., a Felkin-type preference.)... 

---