The Lever Method

A method described by A. B. P. Lever (1968) provides an extremely simple and rapid means of evaluating Dq and B for metal complexes. In this method, the equations for E(v2), and E(v3) are used 

When using the Lever method, the question naturally arises regarding the situation in which the identities of the bands in the spectrum are unknown. Assuming that we do not know that the observed bands are actually v2 and v3, we calculate from the previous example that vjvj = 2.41. It is readily apparent that this ratio could not be v2/v1 because the entire range of values presented for this ratio is approximately 1.2 to 1.8. If the 2.41 value actually represented v3/v2, a value of Dq/B of about 0.52 is 

---

FIGURE 18.7 Diagram for using the Lever method to determine Dg and B for ions having A spectroscopic ground states. (Drawn using data presented by Lever, 1968). 

Spectral bands are observed at 17,700cm 1 and 32,400cm 1 for Cr(NCS)6 3. Use the Lever method to determine Dq and B for this complex. Where would the third band be found What transition does it correspond to ... 

Many groups are now trying to fit frequency shift curves in order to understand the imaging mechanism, calculate the minimum tip-sample separation and obtain some chemical sensitivity (quantitative infonuation on the tip-sample interaction). The most conunon methods appear to be perturbation theory for considering the lever dynamics [103], and quantum mechanical simulations to characterize the tip-surface interactions [104]. Results indicate that the... 

An important consideration for the direct physical measurement of adhesion via pull-off measurements is the influence of the precise direction of the applied force. In AFM the cantilever does not usually lie parallel to the surface, due to the risk that another part of the cantilever chip or chip holder will make contact with the surface before the tip. Another problem relates to the fact that the spot size in the optical beam deflection method is usually larger than the width of the lever. This can result in an interference effect between the reflection from the sample and the reflection from the cantilever. This is reduced if the cantilever and sample are not parallel. Most commercial AFM systems use an angle in the range of 10°-15° between the sample and the cantilever. Depending on this angle and the extent to which the cantilever is bent away from its equilibrium position, there can be a significant fraction of unintentional lateral forces applied to the contact. 

Other noncontact AFM methods have also been used to study the structure of water films and droplets [27,28]. Each has its own merits and will not be discussed in detail here. Often, however, many noncontact methods involve an oscillation of the lever in or out of mechanical resonance, which brings the tip too close to the liquid surface to ensure a truly nonperturbative imaging, at least for low-viscosity liquids. A simple technique developed in 1994 in the authors laboratory not only solves most of these problems but in addition provides new information on surface properties. It has been named scanning polarization force microscopy (SPFM) [29-31]. SPFM not only provides the topographic stracture, but allows also the study of local dielectric properties and even molecular orientation of the liquid. The remainder of this paper is devoted to reviewing the use of SPFM for wetting studies. 

Himmelbau (1995) or any of the general texts on material and energy balances listed at the end of Chapter 2. The Ponchon-Savarit graphical method used in the design of distillation columns, described in Volume 2, Chapter 11, is a further example of the application of the lever rule, and the use of enthalpy-concentration diagrams. 

Figure 15.6 is a schematic diagram of an AFM with an optical interferometer (Erlandsson et al., 1988). The lever is driven by a lever oscillator through a piezoelectric transducer. The detected force gradient F is compared with a reference value, to drive the z piezo through a controller. In addition to the vibrating lever method, the direct detection of repulsive atomic force through the deflection of the lever is also demonstrated. 

This same expression can be derived for single-pan balances that use the method of substitution of weights. The fact that the lever arms are unequal and that there is a constant load on the balance does not alter the final expression. 

In Fig. 10, we show how, for a given value of x > the lever rule is satisfied more and more accurately as the number of moment densities n in the moment free energy is increased The total density distribution ptot(moment method forces the moment densities p,- = J dawi(a)ptot(a) of... 

The valve tap on the cylinder is very tightly closed it is best released by attaching the valve lever and gently tapping the lever end with a hammer in short sharp blows with gradually increasing force until the ammonia starts to escape. This method is easier and is to be preferred to continuously applied hand pressure. 

All the methods presented above are based on the same principle i.e., the material balance using the lever rule. Therefore these are not limited to equilateral triangles, but equally valid for scalene triangles which frequently appear when dealing with subsystems. 

---