The Homopolar Bond

In the first place, we can symbolize the process of forming a homopolar bond by a simple device used by G. N. Lewis, to whom many of the ideas of homopolar binding are due. Most of the elements forming this type of bond are trying to complete a shell, or subshell, of eight electrons, as we 

The elements carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen have a peculiarity rarely shown by other elements they form sometimes what is called a double 

---

The simple theory of the heteropolar bond was developed rapidly in contrast to the theory of the homopolar bond where great difficulties were encountered. Nevertheless, in the last decades important advances have been made, but the enormous mathematical difficulties encountered have resulted in the strict theory being applied only to the simplest examples of chemical combination. The theory of the ionic bond has no difficulties of a mathematical kind and in consequence can be used for more complicated compounds. In the following pages this theory will be treated first, and later a very elementary, schematic presentation of the theory of the homopolar bond will be given. 

Polarization is one of the reasons for the asymmetrical form of the water molecule, and also may be partially responsible for the non-linearity of H2S molecules. Polarization would lead to the pyramidal shape observed for the molecules NH3 and PH3, but it is very doubtful whether it can be held responsible for the asymmetrical form of molecules such as PC13 and SOa. In these molecules, the central ion is positive, if it is assumed that the bonds in these compounds are ionic, and since positive ions have not a large polarizability, the distortion of the molecule can scarcely be due to polarization effects. Indeed, we cannot continue to consider these compounds as purely ionic in character, but will find it necessary to explain their asymmetry on the basis of the homopolar bond (see Section 53). Even in hydrogen compounds such as H20 and NH3 we shall find we have to take into account their partial homopolar structure in order to arrive at a really satisfactory explanation of their structures. 

Some metals crystallize in more than one structural type, which means that there are two alio tropic modifications. The metals marked do not conform precisely to the closest-packed structure, but deviate slightly from it. Uranium, manganese, gallium and indium have very abnormal structures, and the last two are transitional between metallic and non-metallic elements of the carbon group. The picture presented by the metallic structures is utterly different from that of elements of the four last groups of the periodic system. The homopolar bonds of these latter strive to produce a state in which the number of neighbours of each atom is determined by its valency. In the other elements, however, forces appear to be acting that tend to surround each atom with as many other atoms as possible. 

In the homopolar bond, a pair of atoms are coupled together by two electrons while, in a metal, all the electrons hold all the ions together in the crystal. The theory of the metallic bond is even more complicated than that of the homopolar bond, as the subsequent discussion will show. In this section we shall only discuss how metallic properties are distributed in the periodic system. 

This definition of the homopolar bond dissociation enthalpy has to be distinguished from its heteropolar counterpart, the dissociation of a bond into ions 1). An example of a particularly low heteropolar bond dissociation enthalpy for a C—C bond was recently discovered by Arnett6). 

The presence of a completed d shell markedly raises the ionization potential of the element. The explanation of this phenomenon is related to the theory of the homopolar bond the additional mutual interaction of the s and d electrons evidently increases the strength of the attraction energy between the s electron and the atom. 

In pyrites, FeSg, it is possible to distinguish the Sg group in which the bond distance is 2 10 A as in the homopolar bond of pure sulphur. The sum of the ionic radii of two S ions is 3 5 A. In the crystal lattice... 

From this expression it is clear that the moment of the homopolar bond consists of the moments of the structures 1, (2) and 6 (i) a (2)... 

Figure 2 gives the variation of the function along the line of two neighboring nuclei in several molecules. This figure clearly shows that for the homopolar bonds (the central bond of naphthalene, the hydrogen molecule, the lithium molecule) the result of the chemical bond is an increase of electrons between" the nuclei, while for the heteropolar bond (LiH) there is a transfer of charge from one atom towards the others. 

The third part of the EDA investigation of nonpolar bonds between main group elements in polyatomic molecules focuses on the difference between atoms that come from different rows of the periodic system. The changes in the nature of the homopolar bonds in H3E-EH3 are given in Table 13.6. The results of the EDA analyses predict that the interaction energies decrease monotonically from the lighter elements... 

The simplest case is familiar enough the (un-normalised) Heitler-London (covalent) function for the homopolar bond involving two AOs (fi and 2 is... 

If now, we pursue the matter to its end, namely to the distribution of the individual charges, (Eigen-functions), we must expect that, as a result of the common electron shell, which constitutes the homopolar bond, a certain accumulation of negative charge takes place along the line connecting the two atoms. Actually, H. G. Grimm and his co-workers have... 

The formalism of the phlogiston model, if it existed, would follow closely that of the Pearson model, with differences being in the extension with interstitials, the Madelung potential, and a second electronegativity parameter to include the homopolar bond. 

Neutron diffraction of amorphous materials has been utilized for a very wide range of fields, from the homopolar bonding in glassy GeSe2 [34] to the investigation of planetary core liquids [10], with new techniques continually accessing previously inaccessible areas of phase diagrams. 

These sp -electrons are magnetically equivalent. It follows that the excited state is not stable, so that the sphere like outer shell of the atom deforms into a tetrahedron with the valence electrons in the four corners. The four excited electrons turn towards the energy donors for other molecules, which are in our case oxygen molecules, possessing potential and kinetic energy. The homopolar bonding of the 02-molecules is dissolved, and four oxygen... 

---