The Basic System Experimental Results

The basic system was introduced and defined in Sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2, and pertinent analytical models for various operation modes were described in Section 4.1.3. In this section an experimental interpretation of the basic system is introduced, and the experimental results are investigated in terms of the analytical models developed in Section 4.1.3. 

---

To implement the principles of the basic system and extended basic systems into experimental systems operated in several operational modes. The analytical models developed in this study will be used to design experimental operational conditions and to investigate the results obtained. 

The analytical models developed in this part of the study describe the performance of the basic system and allow one to predict the output signal produced by the system when its operational parameters are known. Unlike previous work [76-86], these models explicitly take into account the operational mode of the system (i.e., the reactor type in which the reactions involved take place). This approach was taken in order not only to use these analytical models for numerical simulations, but also to allow us to interpret the experimental results obtained using real systems (Section 4.3) and to assess the validity of the analytical models employed. The models developed are based on mass balances of the components involved and on the characteristics related to the particular reactor used. Unless otherwise indicated, the simulations described below were carried out using these types of input signals with variations of the parameters defined above. 

To assess the validity of the analytical model developed for the basic system as well as of the results of pertinent numerical simulations, three experimental systems were investigated as model systems. These are presented below. 

Vm,2 should be about 20 times the value of the largest Kmj value in the system. As such, relatively large amounts of enzymes are needed in each operation. (It should be pointed out that in the basic system, the two reactions take place simultaneously in the same medium and therefore the reaction conditions are not always optimal for both enzymes.) Thus, to examine the possibility of using the systems suggested above as experimental systems, the values of had to be determined for each of the substrates involved and under the experimental conditions actually employed. The results obtained are presented in Table 4.9. From these values the amounts of enzymes needed for each operation were estimated. 

Figure 4.59 Experimental and theoretical results obtained for the basic system using G6PDH and GR, and operated as a fed-batch reactor. Results were obtained with Vm.oePDH = =...

Figure 4.59 presents the results obtained when the basic system, containing G6PDH and GR, was operated as a fed-batch reactor in the configuration described in Figure 4.58. For comparison, the results of pertinent numerical simulations are also shown. It can be seen that the signal obtained in the experimental system indeed follows the characteristic course shown by the signal calculated, but the actual numerical values are different. This dissimilarity has been attributed to inhibition effects in the reactions involved, effects that were not considered in the calculations. Therefore, a search for potential inhibitors was undertaken.

Figure 4.66 Experimental and theoretical results obtained for the basic system using G6PDH and GR and operated as a fed-batch reactor. Theoretical results were obtained with Fm,G6PDH = 0.211 mM/min and Um.GR = 0.136 mM/min and considering G6P as an inhibitor to GR with the indicated values of Ki Qgp (oo = no inhibition by G6P). No inhibition of G6PDH by NADPH is considered here.

Figure 4.70 Experimental and theoretical results obtained for the basic system with G6PDH and GR when operated as a packed bed reactor. Theoretical results were obtained with n = 5 (i.e., assuming a plug flow regimen), Vm.oePDH = 0.6 mM/min, and = 0.7 mM/min...

The basic concepts underlying the methods of data analysis discussed here are illustrated in Figure 9-1. The results of an experiment are data. A model is a description of the processes taking place in the experimental system being observed, which defines a mathematical relationship between the independent variables and the results. The model also defines physical parameters as variables to be fitted. With plausible initial values of the parameters, the mathematical relationships are used to obtain simulated data, which are compared with the experimental data. The values of the parameters are then varied until an optimal fit is obtained of the simulated and experimental results. 

Examples of such an ELM system are the extraction of organic bases by acidified Internal droplets or the extraction of acids by basic droplets. Experimental results for a continuous internal recycle reactor have been reported for ammonia extraction using a sulfuric acid Internal phase (27). 

As Balberg notes in a review The electrical data were explained for many years within the framework of interparticle tunneling conduction and/or the framework of classical percolation theory. However, these two basic ingredients for the understanding of the system are not compatible with each other conceptually, and their simple combination does not provide an explanation for the diversity of experimental results [17]. He proposes a model to explain the apparent dependence of percolation threshold critical resistivity exponent on structure of various carbon black composites. This model is testable against predictions of electrical noise spectra for various formulations of CB in polymers and gives a satisfactory fit [16]. 

Lackey and Vaughan (1997) presented basic information that can be used in the development of resin injection pultrusion systems. Experimental results and observations were presented to demonstrate the importance of factors such as injection chamber design, injection pressure, type of fibre and the elimination of voids for resin injection pultrusion systems. 

The great structural similarity among the four basic types of cytochalasans known as present, i.e., the [11] cytochalasans, [13] cytochalasans, 24-oxa-[14]cytochalasans, and 21,23-dioxa-[13]cytochalasans, and the experimental evidence available, permit one to postulate a common biogenetic scheme for all cytochalasans. Such a scheme is shown in Fig. 15. The tricyclic systems, which result from the combination of the amino acid with a Ci6- or Cig-polyketide or a biogenetic equivalent, may be structures of a lower oxidation state. It also is unknown at what stage of the biogenetic sequence the introduction of the additional units takes place. 

Calorimetry is the basic experimental method employed in thennochemistry and thennal physics which enables the measurement of the difference in the energy U or enthalpy //of a system as a result of some process being done on the system. The instrument that is used to measure this energy or enthalpy difference (At/ or AH) is called a calorimeter. In the first section the relationships between the thennodynamic fiinctions and calorunetry are established. The second section gives a general classification of calorimeters in tenns of the principle of operation. The third section describes selected calorimeters used to measure thennodynamic properties such as heat capacity, enthalpies of phase change, reaction, solution and adsorption. 

---