Testing methods dynamic rebound test

Before considering particular test methods, it is useful to survey the principles and terms used in dynamic testing. There are basically two classes of dynamic motion, free vibration in which the test piece is set into oscillation and the amplitude allowed to decay due to damping in the system, and forced vibration in which the oscillation is maintained by external means. These are illustrated in Figure 9.1 together with a subdivision of forced vibration in which the test piece is subjected to a series of half-cycles. The two classes could be sub-divided in a number of ways, for example forced vibration machines may operate at resonance or away from resonance. Wave propagation (e.g. ultrasonics) is a form of forced vibration method and rebound resilience is a simple unforced method consisting of one half-cycle. The most common type of free vibration apparatus is the torsion pendulum. 

The most straightforward way to measure the effect of low temperatures on recovery is by means of a compression set or tension set test. Tests in compression are favoured and a method has been standardised internationally. The procedure is essentially the same as set measurements at normal or elevated temperatures and has been discussed in Chapter 10, Section 3.1. As the recovery of the rubber becomes more sluggish with reduction of temperature the dynamic loss tangent becomes larger and the resilience lower (see Chapter 9), and these parameters are sensitive measures of the effects of low temperatures. Procedures have not been standardized, but rebound resilience tests are inherently simple and quite commonly carried out as a function of temperature. It is found that resilience becomes a minimum when the rubber is in its most leathery state and rises again as the rubber becomes hard and brittle. 

It should be noted that the standard test methods for tensile stress- strain properties, tear strength, rebound resilience, and other dynamic properties provide for high-temperature measurements, preferably at the recommended temperatures of ISO 471. 

The so-called Shore hardnesses are measured differently for metals and plastics. With hard materials (metals), a scleroscope is used to measure the rebound of a small steel ball. This Shore hardness is thus measured by a dynamic method, which yields the rebound hardness (the impact elasticity of the rubber industry). Soft plastics, on the other hand, are tested with a Shore durometer. This measures the resistance to the penetration of the point of a cone through the contraction of a calibrated spring. The durometer thus works according to a static method, and yields the true Shore hardness as understood by the rubber industry. Like the Rockwell hardness, the Shore hardness is given in scale divisions. 

For hardness determination, different methods are possible scratching the surface, penetration of an indenter with static or dynamic loads, or rebound as a result of elastic material behavior. The methods with a penetrating indenter are the most important ones. The applied methods are distinguished, e.g., by the shape of the indenter. Brinell hardness is determined by a ball-shaped indenter, while Vickers hardness applies a pyramid-shaped one. After the indenting test with a certain load, the surface area of the indentation is measured which delivers a value for material hardness. Determination of Rockwell hardness uses the depth of the indentation instead of the surface area (Bargel and Schulze 1988). Independent of the method, the so-called surface hardness... 

---