Terminal species thermodynamics

In carrying out the procedure for determining mechanisms that is presented here, one obtains a set of independent chemical reactions among the terminal species in addition to the set of reaction mechanisms. This set of reactions furnishes a fundamental basis for determination of the components to be employed in Gibbs phase rule, which forms the foundation of thermodynamic equilibrium theory. This is possible because the specification of possible elementary steps to be employed in a system presents a unique a priori resolution of the number of components in the Gibbs sense. 

Most radicals are transient species. They (e.%. 1-10) decay by self-reaction with rates at or close to the diffusion-controlled limit (Section 1.4). This situation also pertains in conventional radical polymerization. Certain radicals, however, have thermodynamic stability, kinetic stability (persistence) or both that is conferred by appropriate substitution. Some well-known examples of stable radicals are diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitroxides such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-A -oxyl (TEMPO), triphenylniethyl radical (13) and galvinoxyl (14). Some examples of carbon-centered radicals which are persistent but which do not have intrinsic thermodynamic stability are shown in Section 1.4.3.2. These radicals (DPPH, TEMPO, 13, 14) are comparatively stable in isolation as solids or in solution and either do not react or react very slowly with compounds usually thought of as substrates for radical reactions. They may, nonetheless, react with less stable radicals at close to diffusion controlled rates. In polymer synthesis these species find use as inhibitors (to stabilize monomers against polymerization or to quench radical reactions - Section 5,3.1) and as reversible termination agents (in living radical polymerization - Section 9.3). 

Double bonds tend to migrate to more highly substituted positions within a substrate that is, terminal alkenes isomerize to disubstituted or trisubstituted alkenes, disubstituted alkenes tend to migrate to trisubstituted, and trisubstituted to tetrasubstituted alkenes. Of course, migration can go both ways, and adsorbed surface species may not exhibit the same thermodynamic stability as their desorbed relatives. (The rate of migration is strongly catalyst dependent for example, it frequently occurs rapidly on Pd and slowly on Pt.)... 

The thermodynamically favorable bis(r 3),A-cis/trans configuration 7b of the [Nin(dodecatrienediyl)] complex also represents the catalytically active species for reductive elimination. The new C-C a-bond is preferably established between the terminal unsubstituted carbons on two r 3-allylic groups (Fig. 9) giving rise to the formal 16e [Ni°(CDT)] product 8b, where CDT is coordinated to nickel by its three olefinic double bonds. 

The threading-followed-by-capping method has been recently employed by Stoddart to prepare a [2]rotaxane under thermodynamic control [60]. In this approach, the dibenzylammonium ion 28 - which is terminated by an aldehyde function - is mixed with the dibenzo[24]crown-8 ether (20) to form a threaded species. Upon addition of a bulky amine, the aldehyde-terminated template can be converted into an imine in a reversible reaction establishing a dynamic equilibrium (see 29 and 30 in Scheme 17). 

The derivation of the terminal (or hrst-order Markov) copolymer composition equation (Eq. 6-12 or 6-15) rests on two important assumptions—one of a kinetic nature and the other of a thermodynamic nature. The Erst is that the reactivity of the propagating species is independent of the identity of the monomer unit, which precedes the terminal unit. The second is the irreversibility of the various propagation reactions. Deviations from the quantitative behavior predicted by the copolymer composition equation under certain reaction conditions have been ascribed to the failure of one or the other of these two assumptions or the presence of a comonomer complex which undergoes propagation. 

However, the Rh-catalysed hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes affords the thermodynamically unfavorable anti product 583 as the main product [224], The symanti ratio changes depending on the catalysts and solvents. The syn adduct 584 is obtained by a cationic Rh complex in MeCN [225]. The Ru catalyst gives the anti adduct. Formation of the anti adducts is explained by the following mechanism [224, 226]. Insertion of alkyne to the R3S-RI1 bond generates 585 which, due to steric repulsion, isomerizes to 588 via the carbene species 586, or the metallacyclopropene 587, and gives the anti adduct 583. 

---