Term symbol extracting

Extracting Term Symbols Using Russell-Saunders Coupling... 

The procedure for extracting term symbols from the microstates using the RS coupling scheme is as follows ... 

The extraction process is repeated until all of the microstates have been assigned to term symbols. The next extraction removes a term with L= I and S = I, or a triplet-P term. The degeneracy of the state is (2L + I )(2S + I) = 9. Thus, nine microstates must be removed from the table in a symmetrical manner. The table now reduces to Figure 4.18(c). The final term has L = 0 and S = 0, or S, and is singly degenerate. 

Determine the term symbols for the N atom. Show all work, (a) Determine the number of possible microstates, (b) Write out all the possible combinations of the electrons in a microstates table, (c) Extract the term symbols and determine the degeneracy of each term, (d) Determine the ground-state term symbol using Hund s rule of maximum multiplicity. 

The next steps consist of the extraction and normalization of terms from the zoned input document. To this end, we apply standard natural language processing techniques and normalize the extracted terms to their canonical form with string manipulations and morphological analysis. The former refers to the treatment of symbols (e.g., dashes), and the latter refers to variations of words due to inflection (e.g., plurals). These steps of information extraction rely on, and make extensive use of, our terminologies and ontologies. 

Spectral databases—web-based commercial and free Solid-phase extraction (SPE) expanded solid-phase microextraction (SPME) Chromatography nomenclature lUPAC-recommended terms and symbols used... 

The result is that we get two sets of symbolic solutions for the concentrations. The first set appears to be the appropriate one as the leading coefficient is positive, whereas for the second set the same term is negative, suggesting that for real positive values of the parameters it would return negative concentrations, which are unphysical. Thus we can extract the first set of solutions with the bracketed number 1 ... 

This Glossary contains a number of terms which have been used in the book. Those extracted from BS 499, Part 1 1991, Welding terms and symbols are marked by an asterisk. They are reproduced by permission of the British Standards Institute, 2 Park Street, London WlA 2BS, from whom copies of the standard may be obtained. Where two paragraphs are given, only the first gives the definition in BS 499. 

Transforming the area integral, into a volume integral, all the terms will have the same integration limits. Then, multiplying by (hv) and considering that = c(/ v)(Wa n) we can extract the differential equation in terms of specific intensities. In symbolic form (Ozisik, 1973, p. 251)... 

In the first N terms j = k, q(rj — rjj) = 0 and, this sum corresponds to the intensity coming from the individual atoms or molecules without interference or diffraction. Such scattering and corresponding terms exist even in the gas phase (so-called, gas component ). Thus/ (q)/ (q) =F (q) is a smooth decaying function of q like the square of the atom scattering amplitude shown in Fig. 5.7b. The second term includes N — 1 times more terms than the first one and has very sharp maxima at q(rj — r ) = 2n due to periodicity of the crystal lattice. For identical objects we may also extract f/ = F /orm(q) from the second sum symbols ... 

The recovery of an analyte in an assay is defined by the FDA in a strictly operational way as the detector response obtained Ifom an amount of the analyte added to and extracted from the biological matrix, compared to the detector response obtained for the true concentration of the pure authentic standard. Recovery pertains to the extraction efficiency of an analytical method within the limits of variability. Recovery of the analyte need not be 100 %, but the extent of recovery of an analyte and of the internal standard should be consistent, precise, and reproducible. Recovery experiments should be performed by comparing the analytical results for extracted samples at three concentrations (low, medium, and high) with unextracted standards that represent 100 % recovery (FDA 2001). In terms of the symbols used in Section 8.4, the recovery is thus defined as the ratio (R /R"), and is equivalent to determination of F provided diat no suppression or enhancement effects give rise to differences between R and R" and that the proportional systematic errors and 1 are negligible. The FDA definition of recovery also corresponds to that of the PE ( process efficiency ) parameter (Matuszewski 2003) discussed in Section 5.3.6a, since the former (FDA 2001) measures a combination of extraction efficiency and matrix effects (if any). 

Terms and symbols in that table were extracted from an ISO Standard (ISO, 2008) these are consistent with CIE (2011 - CIE Illumination and Lighting Vocabulary. ... 

---