Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Template efficiency parameters

Figure 1-6 Template efficiency parameters for the tetrapyridylporphyrin templated Glaser coupling of two zinc porphyrin dimers, in dichloromethane. Figure 1-6 Template efficiency parameters for the tetrapyridylporphyrin templated Glaser coupling of two zinc porphyrin dimers, in dichloromethane.
In the panel data models estimated in Example 21.5.1, neither the logit nor the probit model provides a framework for applying a Hausman test to determine whether fixed or random effects is preferred. Explain. (Hint Unlike our application in the linear model, the incidental parameters problem persists here.) Look at the two cases. Neither case has an estimator which is consistent in both cases. In both cases, the unconditional fixed effects effects estimator is inconsistent, so the rest of the analysis falls apart. This is the incidental parameters problem at work. Note that the fixed effects estimator is inconsistent because in both models, the estimator of the constant terms is a function of 1/T. Certainly in both cases, if the fixed effects model is appropriate, then the random effects estimator is inconsistent, whereas if the random effects model is appropriate, the maximum likelihood random effects estimator is both consistent and efficient. Thus, in this instance, the random effects satisfies the requirements of the test. In fact, there does exist a consistent estimator for the logit model with fixed effects - see the text. However, this estimator must be based on a restricted sample observations with the sum of the ys equal to zero or T muust be discarded, so the mechanics of the Hausman test are problematic. This does not fall into the template of computations for the Hausman test. [Pg.111]

The use of MIPs as chromatographic stationary phases is the most studied application of MIPs. This method is, in fact, the best way to quickly and efficiently validate the performance of a developed MIP. To achieve this, the MIP is packed into an HPLC column and the retention characteristics of the template and/or analogue molecules are collected in various selected mobile phases. From the collected data, useful parameters, such as capacity factor, imprinting factor, and peak asymmetry, are calculated and used to evaluate polymer affinity, cross reactivity, and other features of the MIP. [Pg.1016]

This chapter illustrates how templates have been used to aid organic synthesis and attempts to refine and expand the definition of a molecular template. The later chapters in this book demonstrate that templates are emerging as powerful tools in many areas of molecular construction. We have highlighted the key parameters required to evaluate template effects quantitatively. We hope this will encourage pioneers in the field to calibrate new systems, so that we can gauge their progress as they escalate to higher levels of efficiency and sophistication. [Pg.33]

We have developed a general template for construction of asymptotically efficient substitution estimators of /o fully respecting the statistical model. It works as follows. Firstly, one determines a representation of x /o as a function of a smaller parameter Qg instead of the whole P . Let f be the parameter space of Qq. For notational convenience, we will refer to this mapping as I again. Thus, )Ao = P(Qo)- r ow assume the existence of a loss function L(Q) (O) for Qg so that Qo = argminge EgL(Q)(0), and a corresponding submodel... [Pg.181]

The results presented here thus show that there are very broad possibilities for affecting the macroporosity parameters in diverse cryogels and to govern, within certain limits, the architecture and size of the pores templated by the solvent crystals. In addition, there are many possibilities for creating multifarious additional macropores in these gel matrices by using auxiliary porogens. In each particular case, the approach employed depends on the purpose of the produced cryogel and on the set of material properties required for its efficient application. [Pg.95]

As deduced from (1-3), several parameters should be optimized to prepare a system that exhibits efficient catalytic behavior (i) the template, T, should bind the substrates, A and B, tightly and selectively to produce a significant population of the intermediate A-B-T (ii) the ligation step that transforms A B T complex to T-T complex should be enhanced by the presence of the template and (iii) the release of the newly formed product should occur readily to provide accessible catalyst molecules for successive cycles. [Pg.3053]

The replication efficiency is usually characterized by two kinetic parameters e, which reflects the ratio between template-assisted and template-free ligation reactions, and... [Pg.3053]

Another approach is to use a nonlinear regression technique, which produces a weighted least square that maximizes the efficiency of the parameter estimation. This technique does not require linearization and can be used to determine multiparameters. Hernandez and Ruiz (1998) developed an Excel template for the calculation of enzyme kinetic parameters using this technique. [Pg.66]


See other pages where Template efficiency parameters is mentioned: [Pg.74]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.3054]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.344]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.26 ]




SEARCH



Efficiency parameter

Template efficiency

© 2024 chempedia.info