Temperature rise optimization

A temperature rise above 680 °C (at r = 0.45 s) induces allene and methyl acetate synthesis by propylene conjugated dehydrogenation reaction (refer to Figure 4.3), the yield of which under optimal conditions equals 20% and 10%, respectively [62],... 

This process has two design optimization variables. The temperature rise through the reactor A7 and the ratio of the furnace energy to the total energy transferred into the feed-stream Qf/Qtotai are selected as the two variables to be adjusted to minimize the total annual cost of the process. The production rate of C is set at 0.12kmol/s, which sets the fresh feed flowrate at 0.24 kmol/s of an equimolal mixture of reactant components A and B. 

Pick a value of temperature rise through the reactor A7 w (to be optimized). 

The proportion of Ml increases in warm weather regions. M2 and M4 increase when water transport lines are long and the proportion of M3 is lowered as the maximum allowable chilled water temperature rises. However, regardless of these proportions in a particular installation, the goal of optimization is to find the minimum chilled water and cooling tower water temperatures that will minimize the total cost of operation. 

The triethylaluminum solution, saturated with ethylene, is pumped with pump 5 out of the absorber and sent into polymeriser 6. The optimal conditions for polymerisation are 105-110 °C, 10-12 MPa, the reaction time is 6-8 hours. It should be kept in mind that when the temperature rises to 125 °C and pressure to 12.5 MPa, the considerable acceleration and release of much heat (—92.2 KJ/mole) can cause an explosion. The mixture from the polymeriser is sent into separator 7, where liquid products are separated from the unreacted ethylene. The ethylene is withdrawn through backflow condenser 8, where the solvent vapours condense the solution of higher aluminumtrialkyls enters collector 9. In this case the conversion degree of ethylene is 83-85 % the yield of higher aluminumtrialkyls is 75-77 %. 

Temperature. The higher the temperature, the more and quicker the deposition [1,25,36,52,96,98], The optimal temperature to get almost complete deposition of the softener is 25 to 32°C [97], The effect has been assigned to a solubilization phenomenon [96], This proposal is paradoxical, as deposition and solubility are at first glance antagonistic. In contrast, CTAB adsorption onto cotton increases only slightly when the temperature rises [106], An alternative explanation is that DHTDMAC deposition involves entropy-driven phenomena, such as hydrophobic ejection and hydrophobic interaction. 

What we are seeing is a typical practical situation The temperature rise is 15°C higher than we were expecting However, 55°C is perhaps still acceptable (even from the standpoint of getting safety approvals without special transformer materials). Admittedly, there is room for more optimization. However, the next time we do the process, we must note that the core loss is only a third the total loss, not half, as we had initially assumed. 

One of the key issues in the porous media burner is where flame stabilization occurs. Numerical modeling, backed up by atmospheric pressure laboratory experiments, suggests that when stabilization is obtained at the interface between the media, operating flexibility and heat release is optimal. The numerical model results from the University of Texas (Prof. J. L. Ellzey) have been used to guide the positioning of thermocouples in the HP rig wall that will measure the rapid temperature rise adjacent to the interface, both axially and circumferentially. This is an important issue in the excess enthalpy concept on which this type... 

---