Take-Home Lessons

Several take-home lessons may be derived from the analysis of current 

Coverage is poor. In general, most methods do not consider all possible molecules, even when the investigator selects a limited set of building blocks and construction rules. 

Efficiency is low. Considerable time is spent evaluating foolish ideas—for example, molecules that cannot possibly be synthesized or clearly do not have the right shape or charge distribution to fit well in the receptor. Consequently, the methods are slow. 

Unrealistic representation of the system. Almost none of the methods use a realistic representation of the system. More often than not, receptors are rigid, solvent is not present, and the strain energy of the bound ligand conformation is not considered. 

Methods require manual intervention. Because of limitations such as poor scoring functions and primitive user interfaces, all methods require a significant amount rf human supervision. Interpretation of the results usually requires an expert user.  

---

The take-home lesson is that the vast majority of high-pressure studies are on solids or other rigid media and are not done under hydrostatic conditions. The stresses and stress-related properties may vary throughout the sample. Unless the probes are very local and focus on a small region of the sample, measurements are averages over a range of, often uncharacterized, conditions. 

The take-home lesson is that independent electron treatments, e.g. the HMO model, should be used with caution, especially if semiquantitative predictions are intended. Warning Concerning limitations and possible side-effects consult your PE spectroscopist or your neighbour theoretician. 

For isotope effects on equilibrium constants in both gas and condensed phase the take-home lesson is there is no direct proportionality between measured isotope effects on logarithmic concentration or pressure ratios and isotopic differences in... 

Summarizing, this example provides several take-home lessons complete sets of hypersurface calculations for main-frame models of compounds can be quite helpful in close correlation to experimental data. Obviously, both the radical cation ground state structure and the angular dependence of the coupling constants are correctly predicted. In return, by introducing experimental data into the established correlations, the structure of radical cations in solution may be cautiously approximated. Altogether, this example teaches another lesson on how drastic those structural changes may be, which accompany even one-electron redox reactions. 

The take home lesson is that calculations can be employed just as can be experiment to pose and answer basic questions as is a molecule stable because of thermodynamics or kinetics and what is the origin of the stability . In so doing calculations provide a powerful means to explore chemistry. 

The take-home lesson is this When you evaluate an equilibrium constant,... 

The take-home lesson of this exercise is to be critical of the numbers that formulas give you. Just because you get a number does not mean it is reasonable. 

We have just seen several reasons for the unique fitness of transition metals and their complexes as catalysts. The take-home lesson from all of this discussion is that the transition metals and the complexes derived from them are versatile. The stage is now set to examine several examples of homogeneous transition metal catalysis. 

The take-home lesson appears clear a high calcium, low fat diet promotes good health in many ways. Once again, our parents were right ... 

A similar conclusion was derived from analysis of how data are used in making pesticide risk assessments, where the authors concluded that the inability to match a specific exposure scenario to available data (c.g., species and duration of dosing) led to overestimation of absorption and thus risk Ross et al., 2000). The take home lesson from this chapter is that the experimental conditions under which pesticide absorption studies are conducted often overshadow differences between individual compounds, as can easily be appreciated in the classic studies comparing absorption of pesticides in mice (Shah el ai, 1981) versus humans (Fcidmann and Maibach, 1974). 

Electron-Deficient Molecules We learned in this lecture how electron-deficient molecules, made from atoms in the groups 2A and 3A, manage to attain Nirvana despite being initially electron-deficient. Adopting a lone pair on another molecule to create an additional bond achieves the desired Nirvana (this may occur more than once, as in the case of BeCl2). The take-home lesson is that lone pairs are connectivity elements for binding to electron-deficient molecular fragments. 

The take-home lesson about acids can be summarized as follows ... 

The following are some of the take-home lessons from the vignettes presented above. 

C-N bond is 1.472 A (147.2 pm). The fluorine atom is quite small. In covalently bound atoms, the covalent atomic radius of fluorine is 0.64 A (64 pm) and that of nitrogen is 0.70 A (70 pm). Because the C-F bond is shorter in a covalent molecule, the electron density is dispersed over a smaller area and the electron density per unit length is greater. This means that the C-F bond is stronger despite the fact that the F is more electronegative. T7ie take-home lesson here is that bond strength is a function of several parameters. One cannot assume that the more polarized bond is weaker. 

To summarize, the working assumptions in this chapter have value, but are somewhat limited, and they apply only to reactions of alkyl halides and alkyl sulfonate esters. They work quite often, but may fail for primary halides in aqueous media and for solvolysis reactions of tertiary halides in particular. The take-home lesson is to use the assumptions to begin an analysis, check to be certain that they are reasonable, and then make an educated guess. Check each guess against the literature or do the experiment to determine the actual reaction products. However, even if the prediction is incorrect, the exercise forces a review of mechanism, structure, and reactivity, as well as reaction conditions. 

If you got this problem right, feel really good. If it was a struggle, that is alright as well. Not all problems are easy If they were. Nature would be trivial to understand, and life would be boring indeed. In any case, try to learn from these in-chapter answered problems. There is a take-home lesson intended in each of them. 

The take-home lesson here is an important one There is a strong preference for inversion in the 8 2 reaction. Indeed, there is no authenticated example of retention of configuration in this process, despite a great deal of searching by some very clever people. 

The take-home lesson of all this discussion is that although one cannot take the correspondence between thermodynamics and kinetics as a given—there will be counterexamples—in general, the statement Y is more stable and thus formed faster will be true. There is more to it than it appears at first. This statement is tricky indeed, and it is worth stopping and examining it every time we make it. 

Much of the material covered in this introductory chapter is probably familiar to you from introductory chemistry or even high school, perhaps in a different context. Here, the purpose was to recapimlate this knowledge as it pertains to the structure and reactivity of organic molecules. The fundamental take-home lessons for organic chemistry are these ... 

---