Tafel-type behavior

Unlike the cathodic portion of the polarization curve, the anodic portion of the curve in Fig. 3(b) does not exhibit clear Tafel-type behavior. The mechanism for Fe dissolution in acids is quite complex. A line can be drawn in the region just above the corrosion potential, giving a Tafel slope of 34 mV decade k Extrapolation of this line intersects the zero-current potential at 7 X 10 A cm , a considerably different value than the extrapolation of the cathodic portion of the curve. This is not uncommon in practice. When this happens, it is usually considered that the anodic portion of the curve is affected by changes on the electrode surface, that is, surface roughening or film formation. The corrosion rate is typically determined from the extrapolated cathodic Tafel region. 

TABLE 3.5. Tafel-Type Behavior for Three-Step Reactions... 

The kinetic expression implying Tafel-type behavior is Eq. 3.147 (see Section 3.2.1) ... 

An aim of the model is to determine the influence of the various mass transport parameters and show how they influence the polarization behavior of three-dimensional electrodes. In the model we have adopted relatively simple electrode kinetics, i.e., Tafel type, The approach can also be applied to more complicated electrode kinetics which exhibit non-linear dependency of reaction rate (current density) on reactant concentration. 

It is impossible to cover every form of reactor design and operation with an appropriate reactor model. As with reaction models in Chapter 3, we can only try to provide some basic principles that can be applied to particular processes. To simplify the models we ignore dynamic behavior, apart from that inherent in batch operation, and we assume isothermal reactor operation. We also adopt Tafel-type kinetic expressions, but this — as demonstrated in Section 3.2.1.1 — should not make any difficulty. 

Despite these successes, important process parameters, like bath agitation, bath constituents and particle type are disregarded. The constants k, 0 and B inherently account for these constants, but they have to be determined separately for every set of process parameters. Moreover, the postulated current density dependence of the particle deposition rate, that is Eq. (2), is not correct. A peak in the current density against the particle composite content curve, as often observed (Section III.3.H), can not be described. The fact that the peak is often accompanied by a kink in the polarization curve indicates that also the metal deposition behavior can not be accounted for by the Tafel equation (Eq. 4). Likewise, the (1-0 term in this equation signifies a polarization of the metal deposition reaction, whereas frequently the opposite is observed (Section 111.3,(0 It can be concluded that Guglielmi s mechanism... 

The problem with redox reactions of this type is that their rate constants are usually too large for regular steady-state techniques to be reliably applied, a or p then have to be determined through the reaction order or by some method such as Faradaic rectification. Usually, such methods require evaluation of the double-layer behavior in order to make double-layer corrections. This is often an unsatisfactory business, especially when corrections would be required over a range of temperatures. We conclude that for this important class of electrochemical reactions more data for examination of b T) or a T) are required. However, for certain ionic redox reactions that are sufficiently slow, Weaver has been able to evaluate a as /( T) from Tafel plots over a range of 0.3 ... 

Recent work on the h.e.r. at high-area electrode materials, e.g., Raney-Ni type preparations by Tilak, seems to indicate that low Tafel slopes are exhibited at such materials in comparison with the behavior of the same metal in bulk form. This is not just a matter that arises on account of the lower real c.d. s that can be achieved at high-area porous materials since at corresponding low current densities at the bulk metal, e.g., Ni, there is not an indication of a change of Tafel slope from the usually observed value of 100 mV (298 K) to a lower value within -100 mW from the reversible H2/H or H2/H2O, OH" reversible potentials. An example is shown in Fig. 19 from the work of Tilak. ... 

One of the main applications of the accumulation of charge arises from the electrocatalytic behavior of the oxide coatings in the course of the oxide formation process. The Tafel slope (b) for the spinet-type electrodes that are based on cobalt, nickel, and/or iron can change considerably, such as in the case of Co-Ni-P from 0.04 to 0.06 V decade-1, to a typical Tafel slope for the C03O4 spinel in the same solution [27]. 

Often, the exponential dependence of the dark current at semiconductor-electrolyte contacts is interpreted as Tafel behavior [49], since the Tafel approximation of the Butler-Volmer equation [50] also shows an exponential increase of the current with applied potential. One should, however, be aware of the fundamental differences of the situation at the metal-electrolyte versus the semiconductor-electrolyte contact. In the former, applied potentials result in an energetic change of the activated complex [51] that resides between the metal surface and the outer Helmholtz plane. The supply of electrons from the Fermi level of the metal is not the limiting factor rather, the exponential behavior results from the Arrhenius-type voltage dependence of the reaction rate that contains the Gibbs free energy in the expraient It is therefore somewhat misleading to refer to Tafel behavior at semiconductor-electrolyte contacts. 

This method involves the determination of the Tafel slopes 0 and Pc as weU as Ecorr and icom from a single polarization curve as shown in Figure 3.2. This curve is known as the Stem diagram (non-hnear polarization) based on eq. (3.22). The Evans diagram (linear polarization) is also included in order to show that both diagrams have a common Ecorr corr point. This figure illustrates a hypothetical electrochemical behavior of a metal M immersed in an electrolyte containing one type of oxidizer, such as ions. 

---