Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tafel slopes rates

The two dashed lines in the upper left hand corner of the Evans diagram represent the electrochemical potential vs electrochemical reaction rate (expressed as current density) for the oxidation and the reduction form of the hydrogen reaction. At point A the two are equal, ie, at equiUbrium, and the potential is therefore the equiUbrium potential, for the specific conditions involved. Note that the reaction kinetics are linear on these axes. The change in potential for each decade of log current density is referred to as the Tafel slope (12). Electrochemical reactions often exhibit this behavior and a common Tafel slope for the analysis of corrosion problems is 100 millivolts per decade of log current (1). A more detailed treatment of Tafel slopes can be found elsewhere (4,13,14). [Pg.277]

As with all elec trochemical studies, the environment must be electrically conduc tive. The corrosion rate is direc tly dependent on the Tafel slope. The Tafel slope varies quite widely with the particular corroding system and generally with the metal under test. As with the Tafel extrapolation technique, the Tafel slope generally used is an assumed, more or less average value. Again, as with the Tafel technique, the method is not sensitive to local corrosion. [Pg.2430]

The effects of adsorbed inhibitors on the individual electrode reactions of corrosion may be determined from the effects on the anodic and cathodic polarisation curves of the corroding metaP . A displacement of the polarisation curve without a change in the Tafel slope in the presence of the inhibitor indicates that the adsorbed inhibitor acts by blocking active sites so that reaction cannot occur, rather than by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. An increase in the Tafel slope of the polarisation curve due to the inhibitor indicates that the inhibitor acts by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. However, the determination of the Tafel slope will often require the metal to be polarised under conditions of current density and potential which are far removed from those of normal corrosion. This may result in differences in the adsorption and mechanistic effects of inhibitors at polarised metals compared to naturally corroding metals . Thus the interpretation of the effects of inhibitors at the corrosion potential from applied current-potential polarisation curves, as usually measured, may not be conclusive. This difficulty can be overcome in part by the use of rapid polarisation methods . A better procedure is the determination of true polarisation curves near the corrosion potential by simultaneous measurements of applied current, corrosion rate (equivalent to the true anodic current) and potential. However, this method is rather laborious and has been little used. [Pg.810]

Blocking of reaction sites The interaction of adsorbed inhibitors with surface metal atoms may prevent these metal atoms from participating in either the anodic or cathodic reactions of corrosion. This simple blocking effect decreases the number of surface metal atoms at which these reactions can occur, and hence the rates of these reactions, in proportion to the extent of adsorption. The mechanisms of the reactions are not affected and the Tafel slopes of the polarisation curves remain unchanged. Behaviour of this type has been observed for iron in sulphuric acid solutions containing 2,6-dimethyl quinoline, /3-naphthoquinoline , or aliphatic sulphides . [Pg.811]

Adsorbed species may also accelerate the rate of anodic dissolution of metals, as indicated by a decrease in Tafel slope for the reaction. Thus the presence of hydrogen sulphide in acid solutions stimulates the corrosion of iron, and decreases the Tafel slope The reaction path through... [Pg.811]

The ability to use the Tafel slope as a diagnostic criterion can be exemplified by considering a discharge-chemical desorption mechanism for the h.e.r. in which either discharge or chemical desorption may be rate determining. ... [Pg.1209]

The break in the plot log I vs coincides with the observed inflection in rH2 and r0, and corresponds to the onset of Pt oxide formation.6 As shown in Fig. 10.3 the, predominantly catalytic, rates rH2 and r0 depend exponentially on catalyst potential Uriie, as in studies with solid electrolytes with slopes comparable with the Tafel slopes seen here. This explains why the observed magnitude of the faradaic efficiency A (-2-20) is in good agreement with 2F rc° /I0 (rc° is the open-circuit catalytic rate and I0 is the exchange current) which is known to predict the expected magnitude of A in solid-electrolyte studies. [Pg.478]

A qualitative measure of the corrosion rate can be obtained from the slope of the curves in Fig. 2. Z INT is given in units of s ohm" . Owing to the presence of the uncompensated ohmic resistance and lack of values for Tafel slopes [Eq. (2)], data in Fig. 2 should be viewed as indicative of significant changes in corrosion rates. Corrosion loss remained low during the first 2 months, followed by a large increase for both flushed samples and controls. The corrosion rate increased when the surface pH reached values of 1 or less. Total corrosion loss as determined from integrated Rp data was less for the control than for the flushed sample. [Pg.211]

FIGURE 28.1 Relative reaction rates for a reaction with different Tafel slopes at two different electrodes. [Pg.527]

Can an ORR mechanism at Pt metal in an acid electrolyte with the Reaction (1.2) as the first and rate-limiting step be defended in light of the recently reported apparent Tafel slope and reaction order for ORR in the PEFC cathode ... [Pg.13]

The ORR at Pt metal sites has a rate dependence on potential described by a Tafel slope of 120 mV/decade (as determined for Pt model systems at high cathodic overpotential, where Pt is practically surface oxide-free [Parthasarathy et al., 1992a, b]). [Pg.18]

The method permits the simultaneous determination of reaction order, m, and reaction rate constant, k, from the slope and the intercept of the straight line. The procedure can be repeated for various potential values below the limiting current plateau to yield k as a function of electrode potential. The exchange current density and the Tafel slope of the electrode reaction can be then evaluated from the k vs. potential curves. [Pg.194]

Ito et a/.18 supported the above reaction pathways for various cathode materials, such as In, Sn, Cd, and Pb, from the similarity in Tafel slopes. Hori and Suzuki46 verified the above mechanism in various aqueous solutions on Hg. Russell et al.19 also agreed with the above mechanism. Adsorbed CO J anion radical was found as an intermediate at a Pb electrode using modulated specular reflectance spectroscopy.47 This intermediate underwent rapid chemical reaction in an aqueous solution the rate constant for protonation was found to be 5.5 M-1 s-1, and the coverage of the intermediate was estimated to be very low (0.02). [Pg.337]

The first step [Eq. (5)] was postulated to be rate determining because of the Tafel slope of 107 mV/ decade and the first-order dependence of the reduction current on the C02 concentration. The second-order rate constant of Eq. (6) was estimated to be 7.5 x 103 M-1 s-1. [Pg.339]


See other pages where Tafel slopes rates is mentioned: [Pg.2720]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.2429]    [Pg.2437]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.812]    [Pg.1210]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.342]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.179 ]




SEARCH



Slope

Sloping

Tafel

© 2024 chempedia.info