SYSTEMS FRAMEWORK MATRIX

The systems framework proposes to sort chemical uses according to restriction, authorisation (including national permitting schemes) or target-setting (i.e., restricted, authorised, or tolerable uses). To manage this process, a decision-making matrix has been developed that would serve as a ... 

EU risk assessment and the application of the systems framework decision-making matrix both indicate otherwise. The prioritisation method could also isolate several substances that should be given particularly low priorities at the EU level (e.g., BA, butadiene, TCE) which demonstrates some of the inefficiencies of the current regulatory system that could continue under REACH. 

Our main focus in this chapter has been on the applications of the replica Ornstein-Zernike equations designed by Given and Stell [17-19] for quenched-annealed systems. This theory has been shown to yield interesting results for adsorption of a hard sphere fluid mimicking colloidal suspension, for a system of multiple permeable membranes and for a hard sphere fluid in a matrix of chain molecules. Much room remains to explore even simple quenched-annealed models either in the framework of theoretical approaches or by computer simulation. 

If we consider the relative merits of the two forms of the optimal reconstructor, Eq. s 16 and 17, we note that both require a matrix inversion. Computationally, the size of the matrix inversion is important. Eq. 16 inverts an M x M (measurements) matrix and Eq. 17 a P x P (parameters) matrix. In a traditional least squares system there are fewer parameters estimated than there are measurements, ie M > P, indicating Eq. 16 should be used. In a Bayesian framework we are hying to reconstruct more modes than we have measurements, ie P > M, so Eq. 17 is more convenient. 

The limitation of transfer function representation becomes plain obvious as we tackle more complex problems. For complex systems with multiple inputs and outputs, transfer function matrices can become very clumsy. In the so-called modem control, the method of choice is state space or state variables in time domain—essentially a matrix representation of the model equations. The formulation allows us to make use of theories in linear algebra and differential equations. It is always a mistake to tackle modem control without a firm background in these mathematical topics. For this reason, we will not overreach by doing both the mathematical background and the control together. Without a formal mathematical framework, we will put the explanation in examples as much as possible. The actual state space control has to be delayed until after tackling classical transfer function feedback systems. 

When treating CF parameters in any of the two formalisms, non-specialists often overlook that the coefficients of the expansion of the CF potential (i.e. the values of CF parameters) depend on the choice of the coordinate system, so that conventions for assigning the correct reference framework are required. The conventional choice in which parameters are expressed requires the z-direction to be the principal symmetry axis, while the y-axis is chosen to coincide with a twofold symmetry axis (if present). Finally, the x-axis is perpendicular to both y- and z-axes, in such a way that the three axes form a right-handed coordinate system [31]. For symmetry in which no binary axis perpendicular to principal symmetry axis exists (e.g. C3h, Ctt), y is usually chosen so as to set one of the B kq (in Wybourne s approach) or Aq with q < 0 (in Stevens approach) to zero, thereby reducing the number of terms providing a non-zero imaginary contribution to the matrix elements of the ligand field Hamiltonian. Finally, for even lower symmetry (orthorhombic or monoclinic), the correct choice is such that the ratio of the Stevens parameter is restrained to X = /A (0, 1) and equivalently k =... 

Notice that the structure of the model (16) is not restricted to bioprocesses and it can be used to describe a very large number of chemical processes as well. Examples of this class of processes are continuous reactors, recycle reactors and interconnected reactors where the matrix A t) is normally a function of the plant operating conditions (e.g., the dilution rate(s)). Now, the framework of uncertainties and the minimum knowledge on the system that are necessary to design the observers is formally described. For this purpose the following hypothesis is introduced. 

Last not least, there is a great variety of proprietary lO-design software that has been developed at research facilities and university institutes. E.g., at the TU Delft the S-matrix oriented software Photonic CAD was established several years ago, an innovative 10 design framework based on Hewlett Packard s Microwave Design System. Actual academic work e.g. addresses modes of bent waveguides, BMS-3D" ° is a quite new bend mode solver of the IRE, Prague, or FDTD-schemes with non-uniform grids, a topic of special importance to improve computational efficiency when multi-scale feature sizes are requested, to name a few of recent tasks, only. 

---